Ubisoft is clearly not my favorite game company.

Ubisoft is launching a new ecosystem, whatever they mean by that, and to celebrate you can go out to their webpage and have them generate a summary of the time you’ve spent playing Ubisoft games since they started keeping detailed stats around 2015 or so. I’m guessing on that last bit as that’s when they start my review even though I know I’ve played Ubisoft games for several years prior to that.

Here’s mine.

This was interesting. If nothing else, it shows that I don’t tend to play Ubisoft games a whole lot. I mean, I have some impressive hours in here, but not when you consider this stretches back over five years. I’ve spent way more than 313 hours on just a single Call of Duty in a single year before.

For example: Advance Warfare – 432.2 hours, the original Black Ops – 469.3 hours, Black Ops II – 603.1 hours, Black Ops III – 838.2 hours, Ghosts – 762.4 hours, Infinite Warfare – 790.7 hours, Modern Warfare II – 704.5 hours, and one of the grand-daddies of time sinks, Modern Warfare 3 – 1,017.2 hours. Those are just the ones from Steam that I can easily look up. I’m sure I’ve put in similar amounts of time since they moved to BattleNet. Glancing at my combat record in Back Ops Cold War I’m already at 1 day, 5 hours, and 17 minutes for a game that’s been out a week.

So, yea, 313 hours over 5 years on multiple Ubisoft games isn’t as impressive as it sounds. You can also tell I don’t tend to do PVP in games like The Division what with my 0 rogue agents killed. I’m just not good at third-person shooter PVP. I was very surprised that none of the Far Cry games showed up in my review. I thought for sure I had played the last couple more than I had played The Division 1, but apparently not.

As for what the new Ubisoft ecosystem is, I think it’s just a new games launcher. I just realized I hadn’t reinstalled it since the last time I had to restage my system (again, shows you how much I play Ubisoft games) so I just did and… it looks more or less the same. Not sure what’s different about it. Still, it made for a mildly amusing video for the morning and a bit of reflection on how much time I waste playing Call of Duty.

Retail PC version of next “Prince of Persia” totally DRM free.

Kudos to Ubisoft for listening to customers and taking a chance. They’ve announced that the retail release of the PC version of Prince of Persia will have no DRM at all:

“A lot of people complain that DRM is what forces people to pirate games but as PoP PC has no DRM we’ll see how truthful people actually are,” said Easton in a post on the Ubisoft forums. “Not very, I imagine.”

Easton later clarified that only the retail copies will be devoid of DRM: “I was purely talking about store-bought copies of PoP which have no copy protection.”

So the digital download still has DRM, but the disc version doesn’t. Keep that in mind when deciding which one to buy. I’d be happy as a clam except that I won’t be buying the PC version of PoP because it’s a platformer and I prefer to play those on a console. I’ll still be buying PoP for the PS3 so it’s not like they won’t get some money out of me, assuming I don’t get it for Christmas, but at least they’re giving a DRM free PC version a shot. If you’re thinking of buying the game for the PC then you now have an excellent reason to do so. Plus I hear the game is pretty good.

Updated: The folks at GoGamer.com have PoP on sale for $30. Even more reason to buy it.