Gendered molecules, fire breathing dinosaurs, and the Ark of the Covenant on “This Week from the Comments.”

It’s been a long time since someone last showed up and left a comment challenging my atheism on SEB, but someone going by the moniker “James” felt it was his time to shine. In the grand tradition of drive-by commenters, “James” picked a 14 year old entry not written by me that is tangentially related to religion — Defining “Culture War(s)” — upon which to unleash his indisputable logic.

OK, I’m building this up way too much. He sounds like an idiot. In fact, I’m not entirely convinced he isn’t trying to pull a Poe, but for the sake of this entry we are going to assume he is sincere and that his comment reflect his actual beliefs and state of scientific literacy. Let us begin.

Note: Not “James.” Probably not anyway.

So just a thought, God doesn’t exist so you think why then if government’s don’t believe and scientists don’t believe, why are they looking for the ark, why are important people and government scientists trying to find the ark of the covenant.?

They aren’t. Sure, some individuals may be looking for it, perhaps even some otherwise legit scientists, but there isn’t one government body out there that is seriously looking for the Ark of the Covenant. Nor are they hoping to find the Holy Grail, or the Spear of Longinus, or the Crown of Thorns, or any of the other supposed holy relics that mythology tells us about. If you have evidence showing otherwise, I’d be happy to take a look at it.

And since all intelligent life such as humans cows dogs fish ex… must have Male and female the reproduce how can a molecule split and form Male and female at the exact same time.

Molecules don’t have a gender. Molecules are a group of atoms bonded together, representing the smallest fundamental unit of a chemical compound that can take part in a chemical reaction. It is clear from this question that you don’t understand what molecules are or how they work so perhaps you should read up a bit more and reconsider the question you are asking.

And since the first dinosaur was discovered in 1819 how can the bi bible in the book of Job verse 42 to 45 describe them perfectly even breathing fire, wait scientists only discovered they could breathe fire in the 90s .

The first dinosaur fossil was identified in 1815 and determined to be some kind of “giant lizard” in 1824 by William Buckland and even then we didn’t know that it was a “dinosaur” as that name wasn’t coined until 1842 by Sir Richard Owen.

The Bible does not describe them perfectly nor does any dinosaur so far discovered breathe fire. Again, if you have evidence to the contrary that comes from a source other than a Creationist website, I’d be willing to look at it.

There is much more, like how can God be 3 in the same the father the son and the holy ghost let’s think for a second I have a human body something in me thinks and leaves the body also something guides me from within.

The Trinity is nonsense. I’m not sure what the hell you’re trying to offer as proof here other than more nonsense.

O I can’t prove this, let’s see my body is 43 and my mind or spirit doesn’t know time because it is eternal it thinks my body can preform like it was 18 try doing at 43 what you did at 18 the body says know but the spirit says go…

I’m 52 and I have no problems knowing that my body cannot perform like it did when it was 18. If you’re really 43 and are holding onto this much nonsense then I would suggest you seek out a good therapist; and by that I mean not a physical therapist.

 …with this small detail say everyone who believes in God is wrong what do we have to loose, but what if we are right what do you have to loose…

I was wondering how long it would take to get to Pascal’s wager and here we are. There are a whole host of problems and assumptions made by this argument that I won’t get into here (see the link above if you want to know them all), but one of the big ones is that it assumes God doesn’t care if your belief in him is the result of hedging your bets rather than a sincere belief he exists. If God is only interested in True Believers than someone who only believes because of the risk of Hell is probably not going to fare well. It also begs the question of how one makes oneself believe in something he doesn’t believe in “just in case.” Do you believe in Santa Claus on the off-chance he might exist? Think of all the presents you could be missing out on!

but if you choose not to believe it is really your choice, no one else will be faulted.

Thank you, Captain Obvious.

1 thing that is proven we all are appointed to die once, I don’t know of anyone who has cheated death.. I think you must be very brave to not believe and take a chance of not knowing God, 100 years seems long,I couldn’t imagine a eternity….

There’s nothing brave about not believing in something that doesn’t exist. It isn’t brave to not believe in the boogey man or fire breathing dragons or Big Foot or unicorns and it’s not brave to not believe in God(s).

As for eternity, I didn’t exist for millions of years and it didn’t bother me one bit. I doubt it’ll bother me much after I’m gone.

Examining the problems with Pascal’s Wager.

Pascal’s Wager is something we’ve discussed many times over the years here on SEB. Usually because it’s still tossed out as a valid argument by believers who haven’t spent any real time considering the wager in any detail. It comes up so often that it can get a little tiring going over the flaws and why it’s an unconvincing argument.

So it’s good to see that a couple of fellow atheists going by the nom de plumes QualiaSoup & TheraminTrees have take the time to go over the argument in detail with a new video called Betting on Infinity:

As you can see it’s a piss-poor argument for believing in God(s). I’m posting this here mainly so I have an easy reference for the next believer who tries make use of Pascal’s bad bet.

Hat tip to Monica Monicks Salcedo for finding this.