Howard Stringer is the new CEO for Sony.

I’m a long-time fan of Sony products, but the company hasn’t always made decisions I thought were particularly bright. Their line of portable music players, for example, only just recently started supporting the MP3 format. Sony refused to support MP3 because they felt it was the format of pirates so they developed a proprietary format called ATRAC that never really caught on with the public or the other content providers because Sony’s products were the only ones that supported it. In the past with Betamax the problem was with Sony hoping to control the standard for VCRs, but this time out the problem was Sony’s content division demanding that their technology division not support a format that was seen as promoting piracy.

As a result of a number of decisions like that and infighting between the different corporate divisions, Sony has been struggling over the past few years instead of leading the market with innovative products. Apparently the board of directors at Sony decided it was time to shake things up a bit as they just appointed Welsh-born American Howard Stringer to the position of CEO.

“The fact that Sony now has a Westerner at the top, that’s very surprising,” said Michael Goodman, an analyst for research firm The Yankee Group. “It comes down to a recognition by the board that they need to do something differently…They’re facing competition they haven’t seen before, whether it’s low-cost products from China or new technologies where they really haven’t developed a presence. So far, Sony is failing the test as a company.”

After initially being brought on at Sony as a diplomat with no authority over any operating companies, Stringer is now running the entire show.

The board of directors for the electronics and entertainment conglomerate unanimously approved Stringer’s appointment as chief executive and chairman in a surprise move Sunday. The final approval is expected to come from shareholders in a June 22 meeting.

This is good news indeed as Stringer seems to understand the inherent conflicts that come when a formerly technology-only company gobbles up content producing companies and finds itself trying to run divisions that have conflicting issues.

“The interesting thing is that technology companies and pure content companies sometimes have contradictory impulses,” Stringer said in a recent interview. However, “in the last year and a half, building a relationship between content and devices has taken on a new urgency as a part of Sony’s convergence strategy.”

Stringer can help overcome divisional politics partly because he’s not inextricably tied to one arm of Sony, Goodman said.

“Hopefully, Howard Stringer can inject a more market-driven viewpoint, because his entire life has not been Sony,” he said. “He’s been there long enough to make his mark at Sony, but not so long he’s identified with one particular division. I would hope he’s acquired this viewpoint that Sony is part of bigger ecosystem.”

My fandom of Sony products aside, I think the fact that they’re putting a Westerner in charge is a pretty big deal given the strong traditionalism that exists in many Japanese companies that leads to a lot of bad decision making. With any luck, Stringer will be very successful and prompt other Japanese companies to break the mold and try shaking up how they do business a bit.

 

2 thoughts on “Howard Stringer is the new CEO for Sony.

  1. I find it really surprizing that they’d pick a westerner, given their reluctance to completely accept foreigners as part of the team.  Good for them! I worry that it’s just a ploy, though—sometimes they use foreigners as a marker of prestige without giving them any real power.  I hope that’s not the case and that it works out.  I’ve always liked sony.  As an interesting side note, when foreign men marry Jp. women, the men MUST take the Japanese last name by law.  They can never become complete citizens, AFAIK.

    More random thoughts on Sony:
    I’ve always been sad that stylish brands are never the best quality and that the best quality brands often look like crap.  It’s odd with sony because I see both sides of that rule exemplified: their small stereos, for example, don’t look very cool but they’re the one of the best out there.  Their cameras, on the other hand, are more expensive than others in their class, look cool, but seldom get high ratings for picture quality, etc.
    It seems like Apple, too, sometimes sacrifices ram and processor speed for nice cases and such, and puts a big price tag on it.

  2. I used to like Sony a lot, but no more. They insist on coming out with their own standards (memory sticks, ATRAC, etc.) that ultimately screw the user. They don’t care, and they seem to think that corralling people into a Sony-only world will be good for business. I resent this, so if there is a choice I will buy another brand.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.