Noel Dube wins his fight to keep his three story backyard shrine.

Back in September of 2003 I wrote about Noel Dube and the fight over his backyard religious shrine that included items such as a 60 by 20 foot mural of the fabled Fatime miracle, a three-story-tall painting of Jesus Christ, and a 24 foot tall brightly illuminated cross. The now 85 year-old WWII vet started his project after the Virgin Mary spoke to him way back in 1982. In 1999 Pepperell town officials ordered him to remove the shrine because he didn’t have the proper permits and neighbors were complaining about both the size and the traffic from the 4,000 annual visitors it was attracting, but rather than comply Dube expanded the shrine by adding the painting of Jesus and the light-up cross so the town took him to court. About a week or so ago the judge issued a ruling allowing Dube to keep his shrine:

Dube’s lawyer, Edward McCormack, argued that the shrine was protected by the First Amendment, as well as a state law that prohibits zoning ordinances from regulating or restricting structures of religious purpose, as long as the dimensions are reasonable.

Fishman ruled the structures are clearly used for religious purposes and are of reasonable size.

The town of Pepperell had argued that Dube needed permits to legally maintain the mural. Since he refused to apply for permits the mural had to be removed, the town said.

Town Administrator Robert Hanson said the town hadn’t decided whether it would appeal the ruling. He criticized Fishman’s decision as being “narrow in its focus.” The town is concerned about safety, not religion, Hanson said.

“He has a structure 20-something-feet tall, and the town has no knowledge of how it was fastened to the ground,” Hanson said.

Neighbor Jen Reale said she was “surprised and a bit disappointed” by Fishman’s ruling. She said Dube should be accountable for violating rules on size limitations of structures.

Back when I first wrote about this I contrasted it with Alabama’s former Chief Justice Roy Moore’s attempt to defend the massive decalog he had placed in the state’s Supreme Court rotunda and I said then that, of the two, Dube probably had more of a legal leg to stand on. This time around I’d like to point out that this case shows the dangers inherent in passing laws that seek to “protect religious expression” by making them immune to legal restrictions. Often these laws are passed on the argument that they are necessary to protect churches from groups such as the ACLU which religious conservatives are always trying to paint as being out to ban all religious expression everywhere—speaking of which it’s worth pointing out the fact that the ACLU isn’t involved in this case at all—and rarely is anything ever said of the potential unintended consequences of these laws. Commonly this sort of legislation is hastily drafted in response to some perceived threat (real or imagined) and the end result is vague enough that you end up with a situation such as the one here. Because of its religious nature Dube’s three-story backyard shrine is immune from laws dealing with zoning and safety which would normally apply. Don’t like the fact that his 24 foot cross is shining in your windows all night long? According to his niece you should go buy yourself some window shades and keep them drawn then.

While I do agree that many communities are too restrictive about what you’re allowed to do with the land that you own I also see the need to regulate private property use to some degree; if for no other reason than dispute resolution in situations like this. What happens when someone worshiping a neo-pagan religion decides to construct a 30 foot tall penis in honor of Hermes, the Roman God of fertility in his yard? Better yet, a 30 foot tall penis that lights up so you can clearly see it at night? I wonder if the judge would be so accommodating in that sort of situation. Do you think Mr. Dube would be happy living next to someone who has a three story illuminated prick in their yard? Somehow, I don’t think so.

13 thoughts on “Noel Dube wins his fight to keep his three story backyard shrine.

  1. I hope the judge appreciates that he’ll be responsible when that cross falls over and kills some poor fucker.

  2. How could that possibly be considered
    “reasonable”?

    I hope someone does put a giant dick in a nearby yard.  Maybe we could recruit the frat boys who put a giant snow penis in our yard in college?

  3. I SO want to build a 30’ tall Glowing Pink Penis in my back yard, and watch the town squirm when I tell them it’s in honor of Hermes whom I worship.

    But seriously I do totally agree that there needs to be some kind of regulation of what one can build in their own yards, religious or not, but until that happens… time to research to see if there is any laws that “protect religious expression

  4. Mick- if you are killed by a falling cross, you go straight to Heaven, don’t you?
    Bo$$- Uh, Jesus can’t be spinning in His grave- He rose on the third day, remember?
    shana- obviously, you have an ill-informed idea about what “reasonable” really means.
    Raven:
    the town will squirm
    and ban me perm-
    anently.  Herm-
    es will then germ-
    inate his sperm
    and squirt the ver-
    min. They’ll be term-
    inated.

  5. I live only a few minutes away from this place and I have to say that it is definitely the most obnoxious display I have seen in any one person’s yard.  It seems to me that they could get the guy on having a junkyard on his personal property.  There is actually a sign at the end of his road pointing to the “shrine”.

  6. Sorry, Zilch.  I guess I’m just too closed-minded.

    This reminds me of the bloody hand church near my college.  They put this huge cross up on the side of the road with a disembodied bloody hand nailed to it.  Disgusting.  If anything were to ever discourage me from going into a church, that would be it.  The sad thing is that I think they are using it to encourage people to come…

  7. For ALL of you sorry miserable heathen BASTARDS,Noel has passed away to be with his LORD! He died on Fri. the 21st of may,2010.YOU sorry LOSERS who have made fun of him,criticized him and in general simply showed no respect over the years, WILL PAY FOR YOUR SINS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Even though this is ref. to an old thread,May GOD punish you(and you will be punished) and may you all rot in your own hell.You’re living a lie now, and will suffer greatly,unless you ask for our LORDS forgiveness.You people are a sorry bunch of LOSERS……………………………..GOD help you all.

  8. So he made it to the ripe old age of 90, eh? That’s certainly nothing to complain about on his part. At least now his cross won’t be bothering the neighbors all night long.

  9. @ Wayne:

    “Judge not, least ye be . . .”

    “Love thy neighbor as . . .”

    My, my, we are certainly showing how well we learned those Gospel lesson, aren’t we?

    😉

    Peace.

  10. Les:

    He/The cross light never bothered the neighbors,as the back side of the cross was in fact blackened out.
    After that was taken care of……………there was NEVER a problem,contrary to what you were trying to convey.Now perhaps YOU can get a real life,stop making fun/ridiculing(sp?) honest people and actually do something constructive with your loser life!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  11. leguru:

    Let he who is without sin,cast the first stone…………………………

  12. Wayne, if his cross never bothered the neighbors then why did the neighbors say it bothered them? It’s right there in the original entry I wrote:

    “It’s unneighborly, and that’s all I want to convey,” said the neighbor, Nancy Caldwell, an equine muscular therapist whose family moved to Pepperell for its peaceful rural charm.

    Sounds like a complaint to me. It’s not very Christian of you to lie like that.

    As for me doing “something constructive with my loser life”, all I can say is that you sure do seem to think you have me figured out from one single blog entry. Oh my, I wrote something you don’t like. That must mean I’m a loser who never does anything constructive. That’s a tad arrogant and assumptive on your part, don’t you think? Alas, those are traits all too common in far too many Christians. I’m sure Jesus would approve.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.