Famed “Big Foot” film just a guy in a gorrilla suit?

A Michigan native and professional costume maker Phillip Morris says the famous Patterson-Gimlin footage of ‘Big Foot’ filmed back in 1967 is just a guy in one of his gorilla suits. Morris’ costume wholesale company is an industry giant and provides all manner of costumes to Hollywood including a white gorilla suit in the James Bond film Diamonds Are Forever so he knows his costumes.

Charlotte Observer – Bigfoot just a big hoax?

In 1967, a man called, identified himself as Roger Patterson and said he was a rodeo cowboy who wanted to buy a gorilla suit for a gag, Morris recalled.

Morris Costumes was one of the few companies making relatively inexpensive gorilla suits. The suits were in demand because of the popular carnival trick in which a woman morphed into a crazed gorilla and sent patrons screaming from fair tents. Patterson paid $435 plus shipping and handling for the suit.

“I didn’t think it was a real big deal,” said Morris. “It was just another sale.”

Patterson later called asking how to make it more realistic, Morris said. Use a stick to extend the arms, brush the fur to cover the zipper and wear football pads to make the shoulders bigger, Morris told him.

He never heard from Patterson again.

Sometime in October 1967, Morris was in his living room when he saw the now-famous Bigfoot footage on TV.

Even after what would become known as the Patterson-Gimlin film became a disputed piece of Bigfoot evidence, Morris said he never heard from Patterson. Morris told friends and relatives that the creature shot with a 16 mm camera was actually someone wearing his gorilla suit.

He says he refrained from going public because he didn’t want to undermine the still-popular girl-to-gorilla trick, or expose a fellow illusionist.

“In my mind it was a magic trick,” he said.

Like any other True Believers, the Big Foot crowd is insisting that there’s no way the footage could just be a human in a gorilla suit:

“For him to suggest that is just wishful thinking on his part,” said Jeff Meldrum, an associate professor of anatomy and anthropology at Idaho State University, who’s studied the Patterson film. “Everyone in the film industry wishes they can do something as compelling as the Patterson film, but no one has.”

Bigfoot researchers save most of their venom for Long, who they say assassinates Patterson’s character in the book. Still, on the Internet and in interviews, they question Morris’ motives and dissect his statements about why the creature moves the way it does in the film.

Among other things, they say the bend of the human elbow debunks Morris’ theory that a stick extended the arms because the creature’s elbow joint is proportional to its body, its fur looks real and its torso is longer and wider than an average person’s.

“Morris’ costumes are fine for circuses, fine for movies, but the hair doesn’t lie down in the same way as the hair shown on the Patterson Bigfoot, on the live creature,” said researcher Loren Coleman, author of “Bigfoot! The True Story of Apes In America.”

Morris ignores the skeptics.

“You’re interfering with their belief system,” he said, with his wide grin. “It’s like telling a child there’s no Santa Claus.”

Or Bigfoot.

Gotta give credit to Morris for having pegged the problem so accurately. Morris’ story is part of Greg Long’s book The Making of Big Goot: The Inside Story.

9 thoughts on “Famed “Big Foot” film just a guy in a gorrilla suit?

  1. I have seen this film footage at least 25 times, and it has always looked like a guy in a gorilla suit to me. It is striking how similar the behaviour of bigfoot believers, and religious believers can be.

  2. I think a fair test would be to put the man who confessed to wearing the suit in the hoax (Bob Heironimus) and get him to re-enact the video. All you should need to do is to compare his gait and the articulation points (shoulders, hips, elbows, etc.) to get at the answer. With the aid of a computer and a motion study I think they can either rule him out as the hoaxer or give weight to his argument.

  3. It’s good to see someone telling it as it is.

    There is this company in Australia http://www.bioprotechnilogy.com that is a network marketing group. They come to you with these chip devices that attach to the back of your cell phone and the person makes their scare mongering presentaion that these chip prevent you, your kids from getting cancer and brain tumours, than after you are shocked, you are then asked to part with $1,800 Australian to become a manager and then you join others.

    We tested these devices with A high frequency meter elekrosmog device and that the readings were of the same intensity at 217 megahertz and the HF were the same readings with, or without the devices attached

    What the promise of money does to some people

    Evil Bastards.

    I like your site, as you tell it how it is.

    Colin   Sydney Australia

  4. well i don’t know i mean… its like some ppldon’t believe in bigfoot and others do, i guess im neutral

    You can go to my website or email me at the address shown

  5. The Patterson and Gimlin footage of Bigfoot is in fact a fact. For I can show things in the footage that no other has never seen to show this footage is a HOAX and my proof is the footage and I can show it.

  6. Not the Patterson/Gimlin footage. That’s the famous stuff from decades ago. But Patterson admitted it was a hoax years ago. It’s just that die-hards will find any reason to think he’s lying about lying.

  7. Something that never fails to amaze me is the tenacity exhibited by TrueBelievers™ in holding on to their beliefs, even after the perps own up to them.  Another example is belief in alien crop circles, even after several groups have published in great detail exactly how they make them, and even have contests for the best crop circles.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.