Time to impeach?

Posted by KPatrickGlover on Sunday, September 04, 2005 at 11:43 AM. Read 1805 times. Tags:
{name} pic

To understand this post, you must first understand one thing. I have been a strident Bush supporter.

I voted for him, twice. I think he’s been an excellent wartime Commander-In-Chief. I agree with most of his actions in both Afghanistan and Iraq. I may have some issues with many of his domestic ideas, especially those based on his religious beliefs, but I’ve been reasonably content with the idea that he didn’t seem to be pushing them too hard. They appeared to be unimportant to him. I didn’t realize that EVERYTHING that wasn’t involved with the war was unimportant to him.

As has been noted elsewhere, the Army Corps of Engineers laid out plans to strengthen New Orleans’ defenses so they could survive something like Katrina. It has also been noted that Bush vetoed the expense because the money was needed for the war effort. This was a catastrophic decision.

I could forgive it, perhaps, if he stood up and took responsibility. If he explained why he made the decision.

That’s not happening.

I’m watching CNN now, and I just saw someone from the administration talking about the failure to properly respond to this disaster. They’re laying the blame on the various agencies and saying it took the President’s personal involvement to get the ball rolling. They’re trying to paint him as the hero.

I feel ill.

Comments:

Page 3 of 3 pages  <  1 2 3

Rusty United States Posted on 09/08/2005 at 12:19 PM

Rusty pic

The Army Corps of Engineers is responsible for the levees and floodwalls in and around New Orleans. They were designed to protect against a weak category 3 hurricane. There were no plans to upgrade that protection to category 4 or 5. Originally the plan was to have category 5 protection; however, environmentalists sued the district and stopped it. It would have taken 25 years (if it worked) to get the upgrades in to make the levees and walls protect against a category 5. (Source: Riverside magazine by the Army Corps of Engineers).

There was funding cuts to upgrades they were trying to do, but those upgrades would have been irrelevant. 15 foot walls don’t contain 22 foot surges which is what they were facing. As a matter of fact, the portions of the wall that failed were the portions that have received the greatest effort with what the Corps did do. Those were recently upgraded walls. From the NYTimes:


Shea Penland, director of the Pontchartrain Institute for Environmental Studies at the University of New Orleans, said that was particularly surprising because the break was “along a section that was just upgraded.“
Louisiana and New Orleans were aware of the situation which is why their disaster plans call for complete evacuation using, among other things, the buses in the Mayor Ray Nagin Memorial Motor Pool.

McDuff Great Britain (UK) Posted on 09/10/2005 at 07:42 AM

McDuff pic

Bruno

Sorry, the price of gas is going the way it is because there is not yet a viable alternative.  Decisions have definately been made to secure the supply and to control it.

Yes, but the price is being manipulated downwards by the US government.  What you’re seeing with these price rises is just a response by the market to a sudden drop in supply with no drop in demand.  Certain companies can take the piss, but unless you’re in a town with only one gas station the price you’ll see at the pump is more or less the price that the market sets, with gouging compensated for by competition.  A couple of sharks might think they can get away with an extra quarter on the gallon, so just go to another gas station.  If they’re all the same, that’s what gas costs today.

Your article does not mention that it requires some fossil fuel to make this “clean� fossil fuel.

Um, except for the part where it says it will make it out of coal?

I agree it does not address the carbon-dependence of the US energy infrastructure (although fuel made with the Fischer-Tropsch method, which is what Schweitzer is talking about, does burn cleaner than fuel refined from oil).  However, I wasn’t making any environmental claims either.  Fischer-Tropsch refining reduces American dependence on crude oil.  If you’re concerned about gas prices going up, sourcing gas from alternative fossils is one short-term answer.  If you’re looking for a carbon neutral (or even carbon-negative) fuel, you should be writing your congressperson about Zinc-Air fuel cells.

Or rather, you should have written to them about it before they passed that godawful energy bill.

Page 3 of 3 pages  <  1 2 3

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Smileys


Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:


<< Back to main