The Tyranny of Tradition aka Lets dispense with xmas.

Posted by Deoxy on Thursday, November 24, 2005 at 10:52 AM. Read 1532 times. Tags: ,
{name} pic[Editor's Note: Although this is a topic I've written about previously it seemed like a good way to bring the discussion up again in case anyone wanted to talk about it.]

Hello All,

I apologize in advance if this gets kinda long but I have a point I want to make. It is up to you and everyone else who isnt sucked in by the lies that the Christian Church spews to do the right thing and bring some truth into our lives.

The very core basis of the Christian holidays are a farce. There is not one Christian holiday that has any basis in its religious doctrine, in the facts of where traditions come from or in the stories we are told that supposedly give them reason.

You probably all already know, or at least have realized by now that both Easter and Christmas both fall almost bang on days that correspond with relevant solar and lunar confluences. The date of both Christian holidays have changed repeatedly over the last couple of millenia. Christmas has no basis in the biblical doctrine, Easter has only a feint basis as a celebration. Obviously there are no rotund jolly old bearded men wearing red and white in the bible and no bunnies delivering chocolate eggs either.

Where do those things come from? Pagan tradition.

The reason for all this is that Christmas and Easter are both based upon pagan origins - the biblical events were clumsily superimposed over the top by conquerors who murdered anyone who dared disobey the Churches of Europe and their hijacking of our cultures.

April Fools Day is in fact a day of Christian creation - a papal decree intended to oppress non-Christians and force them into falling into line with their doctrine.
Ancient cultures, including those as varied as the Romans and the Hindus, celebrated New Year’s Day on April 1. It closely follows the vernal equinox (March 20th or March 21st.) In medieval times, much of Europe celebrated March 25, the Feast of Annunciation, as the beginning of the new year.

In 1582, Pope Gregory XIII ordered a new calendar (the Gregorian Calendar) to replace the old Julian Calendar. The new calendar called for New Year’s Day to be celebrated Jan. 1. Many countries, however, resisted the change. In fact, some European countries held out for centuries (Scotland until 1660; Germany, Denmark, nd Norway until 1700; and England until 1752).

In my opinion, the great misnomer of the period is the humble “Christmas tree” - a name that may well be oxymoronic - a self-contradiction.  The act of cutting down an evergreen tree and bringing it inside your home at winter time is a tradition that is more than 7000 years old - That is a fact.  Many cultures did this - including even the ancient Egyptians millenia before the Judeo/Christian faiths existed!! It was believed that the trees would bring luck and that they had a magical power to resist winter and if people brought those trees inside with them they believed the tree would help their family to survive the hardships of the season.

Not forgetting of course that the bible actually directly forbids and condemns the taking in of an evergreen tree as a pagan tradition. 

“Thus saith the LORD, Learn not the way of the heathen, and be not dismayed at the signs of heaven; for the heathen are dismayed at them. For the customs of the people are vain: for one cutteth a tree out of the forest, the work of the hands of the workman, with the axe. They deck it with silver and with gold; they fasten it with nails and with hammers, that it move not.” (Jeremiah 10:2-4, KJV)

Christian apologists make the excuse that reading the rest of Jeremiah gives the context that the tree is only forbidden if it is an “idol” and they try to make some technical distinction between todays “Christmas trees” and those of old by saying that the sin was in idolizing the object.

Make up your own mind - but I think that’s BS.  Bringing an evergreen tree into the house is a pagan tradition, non-Christians have been doing it for millenia, many asian cultures do the same thing in fact.

Easter is an rip on the Spring Equinox - An obvious time in an agricultural society to have a celebration - time for sowing and planting new crops and a time when and traditions concerned with hopes for a good harvest.

The 25th of December is a close approximation to the shortest day in the western half of the northen hemisphere (the 20th/21st of December). 
The Winter Solstice in Pagan tradition was a time when quite often families would surprise each other with secret stashes of food that they had put aside during the warmer months of the year when there was plenty to eat. 

Fruits, nuts, berries - all preserved by drying or some form of waxy glaze in some circumstances, smoked and salted meats were always a favorite around the time of the holidays - in the right conditions even without refrigeration apparatus meat that is cooked, smoked and salted will stay edible for many months. 

The idea of saving one or two of your fattest healthiest turkeys or other fowl for slaughter around this time to be the centerpiece of a big feast must have surely crossed peoples minds too.  It’s a well known fact that Dark ales, Port, Sherry, and Spirits are all winter favorites which were also given as gifts.

You only have to imagine what it must have been like for a working family who were not wealthy to have to get Children through long and bitterly cold winters before modern convenience items were available.  There was no 24 hour Asda/Sainsburys/Walmart/Target/etc around and you ate what you could find, kill, steal or scrounge.

So what can we do?  Well we can all try to set things straight and place rational traditions of joy and preclude traditions which enforce doctrines that are centered on selfish arrogant belief systems that promote irrational and unscientific cultural arguments. 

Take back our culture - Don’t call it Christmas - Call it what it is - The Winter Solstice.  Don’t call it Easter - call it Spring Equinox
Only by beginning new traditions can we begin to rid ourselves of our cultural dependance upon religious doctrine. 
The good news about this is that you can do this yet almost none of the traditions we enjoy at these times of year need be sacrificed - only their meaning should be changed to reflect reality - not Christian revisionism.

Tree’s, Gifts, Feasting, Turkey, and of course - Booze!  All part of the pagan traditions of the winter solstice.

In lieu of that you can always decide on Festivus!!
Festivus for the Rest of Us!

Happy Holidays to all of you.

Deoxy.

P.S. My apologies if I am singing to the choir here - I’ve found that even some the best educated atheists don’t realize to what degree the Christian Churches have managed to pull the wool over peoples eyes.  If you all know this stuff, I’m sorry if I come off as patronizing, arrogant or a little presumptuous.  I’m here to hopefully meet a few cool people who think on the same wavelengths. 

Comments:

Page 1 of 1 pages

Les United States Posted on 11/24/2005 at 12:36 PM

Les pic

Honestly if I were going to stop referring to it as Christmas the last thing I’d start referring to it as is an old Seinfeld joke. I’m not enough of a fan to go that far. grin

Most of the time I prefer to give credit where credit is due and refer to the holiday as Yule, but you’d be amazed at the number of idiots who don’t know what you’re talking about if you call it by its original name. So I use Christmas mainly for expediency’s sake. Personally, I don’t really care what you call it so long as I can enjoy it in my own fashion.

 Signature 

When one reads Bibles, one is less surprised at what the Deity knows than at what He doesn’t know.
-- Mark Twain

Deoxy United States Posted on 11/24/2005 at 08:18 PM

Deoxy pic

I have to say I agree with you, Les, and thankyou for allowing me to address this topic once again.

I realized this was something that most people here were probably aware of and I saw that you have written stuff like this yourself.

The term “Yule” is a good one - another one of the names I like to use but as you say, Christmas is an expedient reference that wont elicit a “huh?” and a bunch of stupid questions that you didn’t want to answer in the first place.

Celebrating holidays however you will is important.

It is the “Pascal’s wager” set that I feel most sorry for - the set that say “Well yeah, there is no proof that there is a god, but what if you’re wrong and you go to hell?  Does it really hurt to give God your prayers of worship just in case it will save your soul”.

Those people just don’t realize how many sacrifices they make in their lives like spending holidays in cold drafty churches listening to mindless mantras of child molesting hypocrites.

Re Festivus - the old Seinfeld joke - some people can’t handle the seriousness of officially dismissing the season as having relevance to the bible and the implication that has within many families becuase there is always one or two people at least who are religious and who just love to make a fuss about people who don’t subscribe to their narrow worldview.

My thinking was that using the name Festivus is a good way to laugh off any inter-family tension between believers and non-believers.

I’m all for the peace and goodwill to men bit.

Peace and Goodwill Les, and to everyone here,

Regards,

Deoxy.

Daryl Cantrell United States Posted on 11/26/2005 at 03:32 AM

Daryl Cantrell pic

Deoxy: I’m sorry if I come off as patronizing, arrogant or a little presumptuous.

You forgot ignorant.

Let’s start with your misunderstanding of the Old Testament:

Deoxy: Not forgetting of course that the bible actually directly forbids and condemns the taking in of an evergreen tree as a pagan tradition.. Christian apologists make the excuse that reading the rest of Jeremiah gives the context that the tree is only forbidden if it is an “idol� and they try to make some technical distinction between todays “Christmas trees� and those of old by saying that the sin was in idolizing the object.

That’s because anyone who actually reads Jeremiah chapter 10 can see that the prophet is railing against idolatry, not cutting down trees.  The text has nothing whatsoever to do with Christmas trees.

Jeremiah is mocking those who create idols out of wood, gold, and silver, and then worship what they made with their own hands.  Interpreting this as an interdiction against Christmas trees makes as much sense as saying Christians shouldn’t live in wood-framed houses because the wood was “cutteth out of the forest, the work of the hands of the workman, with the axe.” I guess I should live in a mud hut...?

Let’s look at the next two verses:

They are upright as the palm tree, but speak not: they must needs be borne, because they cannot go. Be not afraid of them; for they cannot do evil, neither also is it in them to do good.

Forasmuch as there is none like unto thee, O LORD; thou art great, and thy name is great in might.

I think the readers of this blog can see that Jeremiah here is talking about idols fashioned from wood, gold, silver, etc, by the work of human hands.  In particular, the non-Semitic tribes in the trans-Jordan area were prone to lure the Hebrews into worshiping at sacred groves and what the Bible calls “poles”, which were carved wooden idols set up on hilltops for use in pagan rituals.  See, for example, 1 Kings chapter 14 although the bulk of the Historical Books is a chronicle of the conflict between Jewish orthodoxy and paganism.

Wisdom chapter 13 spells out God’s opinion of idols even more clearly:

But doomed are they, and in dead things are their hopes, who termed gods things made by human hands: Gold and silver, the product of art, and likenesses of beasts, or useless stone, the work of an ancient hand.

A carpenter may saw out a suitable tree and skillfully scrape off all its bark, And deftly plying his art, produce something fit for daily use,
and use up the refuse from his handiwork in preparing his food, and have his fill;

Then the good-for-nothing refuse from these remnants, crooked wood grown full of knots, he takes and carves to occupy his spare time. This wood he models with listless skill, and patterns it on the image of a man or makes it resemble some worthless beast. When he has daubed it with red and crimsoned its surface with red stain, and daubed over every blemish in it, He makes a fitting shrine for it and puts it on the wall, fastening it with a nail.  Thus lest it fall down he provides for it, knowing that it cannot help itself; for, truly, it is an image and needs help.

But when he prays about his goods or marriage or children, he is not ashamed to address the thing without a soul.
And for vigor he invokes the powerless;
and for life he entreats the dead;
And for aid he beseeches the wholly incompetent,
and about travel, something that cannot even walk.
And for profit in business and success with his hands he asks facility of a thing with hands completely inert.

Deoxy: You probably all already know, or at least have realized by now that both Easter and Christmas both fall almost bang on days that correspond with relevant solar and lunar confluences.

Honestly I’m not entirely sure what the point of your whole post is..  People have been celebrating the Solstice and Equinox since before recorded history.  When people became Christians, they didn’t simply abandon their yearly traditions.  They continued to celebrate what was sacred to them: obviously the birth of Jesus and his resurrection would top the list.

Deoxy: Obviously there are no rotund jolly old bearded men wearing red and white in the bible and no bunnies delivering chocolate eggs either.

Well, I’m with you here.  Santa and the Easter Bunny are not my cup of tea.  Secular distractions for what I consider a religious celebration.

When my kid(s) get old enough to celebrate Christmas, my wife and I plan to give them gifts from Mommy and Daddy, not some guy from the north pole.  And I’ll tell them they get gifts on Christmas for the same reason they get gifts on their birthday—Christmas is when we celebrate Christ’s birthday after all, even without any sure knowledge of what day that may have been.

Deoxy: Celebrating holidays however you will is important.

Unless of course you want to celebrate Christmas and Easter by giving thanks for the birth and resurrection of Jesus.  Apparently that would be just awful.

Say, Deoxy, while we’re complaining about people changing the original meaning of holidays, let’s take a look at Abraham Lincoln’s original decree making the last Thursday of November a permanent holiday named “Thanksgiving”:

Abraham Lincoln: To these bounties, which are so constantly enjoyed that we are prone to forget the source from which they come, others have been added, which are of so extraordinary a nature, that they cannot fail to penetrate and soften even the heart which is habitually insensible to the ever watchful providence of Almighty God.

No human counsel hath devised nor hath any mortal hand worked out these great things. They are the gracious gifts of the Most High God, who, while dealing with us in anger for our sins, hath nevertheless remembered mercy.

It has seemed to me fit and proper that they should be solemnly, reverently and gratefully acknowledged as with one heart and voice by the whole American people. I do therefore invite my fellow citizens in every part of the United States, and also those who are at sea and those who are sojourning in foreign lands, to set apart and observe the last Thursday of November next, as a day of Thanksgiving and Praise to our beneficent Father who dwelleth in the Heavens. And I recommend to them that while offering up the ascriptions justly due to Him for such singular deliverances and blessings, they do also, with humble penitence for our national perverseness and disobedience, commend to his tender care all those who have become widows, orphans, mourners or sufferers in the lamentable civil strife in which we are unavoidably engaged, and fervently implore the interposition of the Almighty Hand to heal the wounds of the nation and to restore it as soon as may be consistent with the Divine purposes to the full enjoyment of peace, harmony, tranquillity and Union.

Since you’ve appointed yourself “High Protector of Holidays’ Original Intent”, I assume that you are outraged by the increasing secularization of Thanksgiving and eager for it to return to its original, religious roots as a day of prayer.. Right?

nowiser United States Posted on 11/26/2005 at 10:44 AM

nowiser pic

[coughing quietly into his hand]

Not that I want to intrude into this discussion, and not that it makes much of a difference, but Lincoln’s references to God were reserved for public ceremony.

He wasn’t a believer.

http://www.positiveatheism.org/mail/eml8326.htm

Did you not read what Lincoln himself said, when a close associate chided him about having given a similar speech?

Here it is: here is what Lincoln said in private about the infamous “Thanksgiving Address” that he gave in public (although he did not write it):

Oh, that is some of Seward’s nonsense, and it pleases the fools.
-- to Judge James M. Nelson, in response to his question from Nelson: “I once asked him about his fervent Thanksgiving Message and twitted him with being an unbeliever in what was published.” Quoted from Franklin Steiner, The Religious Beliefs of Our Presidents, p. 138

As for Christmas trees, it’s pretty clear that Christians have a long history of ‘borrowing’ traditions and practices from the cultures that they assimilate [oops, sorry, I meant ‘convert’]

 Signature 

It vexes me when they would constrain science by the authority of the Scriptures, and yet do not consider themselves bound to answer reason and experiment—Galileo

Les United States Posted on 11/26/2005 at 10:49 AM

Les pic

Daryl writes…

That’s because anyone who actually reads Jeremiah chapter 10 can see that the prophet is railing against idolatry, not cutting down trees.  The text has nothing whatsoever to do with Christmas trees.

Jeremiah is mocking those who create idols out of wood, gold, and silver, and then worship what they made with their own hands.  Interpreting this as an interdiction against Christmas trees makes as much sense as saying Christians shouldn’t live in wood-framed houses because the wood was “cutteth out of the forest, the work of the hands of the workman, with the axe.â€? I guess I should live in a mud hut...?

The problem with that defense is the simple fact that Christmas trees are, in fact, a form of idolatry. The whole intent behind the Pagan ritual was worship of the tree. It’s a Pagan symbol that has nothing to do with Christianity and was fully intended to represent the Gods the Pagans believed in. Even the act of decorating the tree was a form of worship as it was meant as an offering to the tree spirits to return to the forest in the spring. In fact, most of the traditions we practice on Christmas—short of attending Mass—are Pagan rituals meant to honor and glorify Pagan Gods.

Simply because most Christians are ignorant of this fact doesn’t mean it’s not still a form of idolatry.

Honestly I’m not entirely sure what the point of your whole post is..  People have been celebrating the Solstice and Equinox since before recorded history.  When people became Christians, they didn’t simply abandon their yearly traditions.  They continued to celebrate what was sacred to them: obviously the birth of Jesus and his resurrection would top the list.

Or, more appropriately, when the early Church was unable to get them to stop their yearly traditions they at least managed to subjugate them into adopting Christian icons in place of most of the Pagan ones. If you can’t beat it out of ‘em…

Well, I’m with you here.  Santa and the Easter Bunny are not my cup of tea.  Secular distractions for what I consider a religious celebration.

Secularized icons, perhaps, but religious enough when they first came on the scene. Just not your particular religion. Both icons still hold a lot of religious meaning for plenty of people these days.

Unless of course you want to celebrate Christmas and Easter by giving thanks for the birth and resurrection of Jesus.  Apparently that would be just awful.

I don’t have a problem with folks celebrating the days as the imaginary dates of significant events in a fictional holy man’s life, until they start trying to tell me that “Jesus is the reason for the season” and other such nonsense. Then, yeah, I have a problem with it. It’s not enough for most Christians to celebrate the day in the fashion they prefer. They have to insist that everyone else buy into their fantasy that it really is Jesus’ birthday and he’s what started the tradition.

 Signature 

When one reads Bibles, one is less surprised at what the Deity knows than at what He doesn’t know.
-- Mark Twain

zilch Austria Posted on 11/26/2005 at 11:43 AM

zilch pic

I go along with Les on this one.  True- it’s pretty clear that the early Christians exapted the Pagan Winter Solstice celebration for Christmas, since there’s no indication in the Bible what time of year Jesus was born (except perhaps in Luke 2:8 where it says “And there were in the same country shepherds abiding in the field, keeping watch over their flock by night”, which would seem to preclude winter, since it is thought to have been too cold for the flocks and sheperds to be out).  But hey, it’s all myth, from Yule and Jesus to Eastra and the Easter Bunny, and ultimately the only thing that should matter is that everyone is allowed to celebrate, or not, as they wish.

 Signature 

You were born.  And so you’re free.  So happy birthday.
- Laurie Anderson

Daryl Cantrell United States Posted on 11/26/2005 at 04:56 PM

Daryl Cantrell pic

Les: The problem with that defense is the simple fact that Christmas trees are, in fact, a form of idolatry. The whole intent behind the Pagan ritual was worship of the tree.

Simply because most Christians are ignorant of this fact doesn’t mean it’s not still a form of idolatry.

On the contrary.  Idolatry is not something you can be “tricked into” or even do out of ignorance.  This is a common misconception amongst the anti-Chistian crowd.  “Haha,” they say, “you’re worshipping pagan gods and you don’t even know it!!” Ridiculous.

If I start worshiping my microwave oven—leaving offerings for it, praying to it, thanking it for heating my food—that’s idolatry.  It makes no difference whether there was once a “Cult of the Microwave” practiced by pagans in the distant past.  Idolatry is the act of giving worship to a chair, a tree, the sun, the moon, or any other worldly thing.

Conversely, suppose that a friend gives me a buddha statue as a gift and I put it up on the mantle for a while just to be polite.  That doesn’t make me an idolater.  It’s the act of worship which is sinful, not the object itself.

Another example would be the enormous cross or crucifix you’ll see at the front of most Christian churches.  We worship at the cross, we certainly don’t worship the cross itself, which is the work of human hands.  Worshiping the cross itself would be idolatry, even though the symbol involved is a Christian one.

Don’t take my word for it: Jeremiah says the same thing.  “Be not afraid of them; for they cannot do evil, neither also is it in them to do good.” Christmas trees, easter bunnies and buddha statues can’t hurt you, nor can they help you.

That’s a good thing, because practically every object on earth has been the subject of pagan worship at one time or another.  If Christians had to live their life by the “Deoxy / Les Rules of Idolatry” we’d have to lock ourselves in an empty room with no windows.

Here’s a Christian Idolatry quick-reference card:

Decorating your living room with a Christmas tree: Ok
Worshiping the tree and making offerings to “tree spirits”: Not Ok

Easter Egg hunt for kids: Ok
Worshiping fertility god / goddess: Not Ok

Crucifix as a reminder of Christ’s sacrifice: Ok
Crucifix as an object of worship: Not Ok

Swimming in the ocean because it’s fun: Ok
Pilgrimage to swim in the ocean to gain the blessings of Poseidon, god of the seas: Not Ok

You get the idea.

WhyNot Australia Posted on 11/26/2005 at 05:47 PM

WhyNot pic

Didn’t jews worship the devil before discovering judism?

So maybe Christmas should be left alone..

=WHYNOT=

Patness Canada Posted on 11/26/2005 at 09:27 PM

Patness pic

Jews worshipping the Devil before Judaism? Says another book of mythos? With all respect I’m inclined to take that as seriously as.... well… no, I’m not inclined to take that seriously at all. Sorry raspberry

I dunno about anyone else here, but the traditions we speak of were probably practiced before the time of Christ, yet to some extent they are very similar. Am I the only person that thinks so? So… calling it Christmas, not slightly after-the-fact? Besides which, we’re not even differentiating based on actions - just the intentions for which those actions took place, given some slack for several thousand years of historical influence.

It wouldn’t be the first time religion excercised political force to gain public acceptance/crush it’s enemies. In fact, we’ve got a history replete with instances where these things have happened. I agree with Les, here. I’m all for live and let-live, but personally, I want these ideas put forward publicly (as I believe it was Wal Mart was attacked for doing), so that I don’t have to hear about how the Church is the source of everything everywhere. Besides it being patently untrue, it’s just getting old. Go home, enjoy your family, eat milk and cookies on your kids, bang your wife, enjoy life. I understand that most Christian/Catholic types think it’s a good thing to “spread the good word”, but has anyone considered how many times the average person has been proselytized to? I mean, can anyone seriously think they’re breaking new ground? In Canada I suppose there’s always the immigrants, but even then, that’s pushing it.

Just an aside.

 Signature 

The Kidney Punch Of Legendary Peace

One sure and primary and fundamental fact is the joint existence of a subject and of its world. The one does not exist without the other. I acquire no understanding of myself except as I take account of objects, of the surroundings. I do not think unless I think of things — and there I find myself. - Bruce Lee

Patness Canada Posted on 11/26/2005 at 09:34 PM

Patness pic

P.S., cool input, Daryl. Good stuff.

 Signature 

The Kidney Punch Of Legendary Peace

One sure and primary and fundamental fact is the joint existence of a subject and of its world. The one does not exist without the other. I acquire no understanding of myself except as I take account of objects, of the surroundings. I do not think unless I think of things — and there I find myself. - Bruce Lee

Deoxy United States Posted on 11/27/2005 at 09:45 AM

Deoxy pic

Part 2 of reply to Daryl Cantrell

When the Christians came from France up to depose the Anglo-Saxon King Harold from his throne of the English monarchy in 1066 the new Norman French conquerors and their King William were left with the task of spreading Christianity throughout a staunchly pagan Anglo-Saxon nation that had just been through a horrific bloody war.

They realized that to introduce Christianity they had to be somewhat subtle – a rare occurrence for Christianity which has largely spread using intimidation and violence – much like the Spanish inquisition.

The Winter Solstice and the Spring Equinox are dates of traditions of the Anglo-Saxons and they were hijacked by the Christians, but being people who understood the concept that a little sugar helps the “medicine” go down they simply incorporated the dates and traditions of the pagans and renamed them as Christian holidays.

People have been celebrating the Solstice and Equinox since before recorded history.  When people became Christians, they didn’t simply abandon their yearly traditions.  They continued to celebrate what was sacred to them: obviously the birth of Jesus and his resurrection would top the list.

In reply I feel I must quote Bertrand Russell.

“Religion is based, I think, primarily and mainly upon fear… fear of the mysterious, fear of defeat, fear of death. Fear is the parent of cruelty, and therefore it is no wonder if cruelty and religion have gone hand in hand.”—Bertrand Russell from his 1927 essay “Why I am not a Christianâ€?

In my opinion, it’s terrible and very sad that you’ve been brainwashed like this by Christians. I would hate to be someone who was incapable of creating a morality by using good sense and instead needed to be force-fed every single thought in my head.

Pagans didn’t just “Become Christians”, they were forced to accept the church, they were threatened with violence, they were mocked or intimidated by tales of hell and other myths or, as Christianity gathered support they were just plain threatened with violence and exile from the community.

The money that had been gathered from others who were made Christians by the threat of sword or exile was used to recruit soldiers of the Church who became enforcers.

You really should know about the truth of the history of the Christian faith.
All these modern churches and groups are all trying to make “God� trendy and use funky Christian music and stuff to brainwash another generation into thinking that Christians morality is the only good and true morality.

I must recommend to you this website.

http://www.truthbeknown.com/victims.htm

Well, I’m with you here.  Santa and the Easter Bunny are not my cup of tea.  Secular distractions for what I consider a religious celebration.

Well Daryl, I don’t and I want to be free to celebrate what I want to.
It’s a difficult thing to do when you are surrounded by people who consider it their lifes work to go around harassing and brainwashing everyone into their way of (not) thinking.

I would like to peacefully coexist with those who genuinely choose Christianity, but that’s nor what you or others Christians want. You want everyone to submit to Christian Dogma, if it takes a little violence, torture, intimidation of political corruption to do so then that’s O.K. with you guys, just like it has been throughout recent centuries.

Unless of course you want to celebrate Christmas and Easter by giving thanks for the birth and resurrection of Jesus.  Apparently that would be just awful.

You might as well celebrate the birth and resurrection of the invisible pink unicorns and giant space-faring spaghetti monsters.  It’s all fictional.

When your children grow up into adolescence will you allow them to know about secular humanism, will you accept them if they decide to be atheists?I doubt it.  Such is the intolerance of the “holier than all” set.

Say, Deoxy, while we’re complaining about people changing the original meaning of holidays, let’s take a look at Abraham Lincoln’s original decree making the last Thursday of November a permanent holiday named “Thanksgiving�:

Say Daryl, How abouts you start telling the truth about the religious stance of the founding fathers of the USA and the truth about the history of this nation?

Oh, and how abouts you start being honest about how cruel, intolerant, ignorant and hateful Christians were when they came to this land?

How abouts you find out what stuff like Columbus’s “Spanish requerimiento� were?

The Spanish requerimiento was what Columbus and other Christians who invaded this land would read to the natives before murdering, pillaging, raping and enslaving them and it read as follows;

“I certify to you that, with the help of God, we shall powerfully enter into your country and shall make war against you in all ways and manners that we can, and shall subject you to the yoke and obedience of the Church and Their Highnesses. We shall take you and your wives and your children, and shall make slaves of them, and as such shall sell and dispose of them as Their Highnesses may command. And we shall take your goods, and shall do you all the mischief and damage that we can, as to vassals who do not obey and refuse to receive their lord and resist and contradict him.�

Since you’ve appointed yourself “High Protector of Holidays’ Original Intent�, I assume that you are outraged by the increasing secularization of Thanksgiving.

Actually I’m more eager to restore to the history books the truth about the genocide and enslavement of the native population that was brought about by Christians and Christian Church leaders.

Regards,

Deoxy.

THEOCRAT United States Posted on 11/28/2005 at 06:59 PM

THEOCRAT pic

Deoxy:
I would like to peacefully coexist with those who genuinely choose Christianity, but that’s nor what you or others Christians want. You want everyone to submit to Christian Dogma, if it takes a little violence, torture, intimidation of political corruption to do so then that’s O.K. with you guys, just like it has been throughout recent centuries.

Crap, where’s my cat o’ nine tails?  I didn’t make my heathen conversion quota for the day.

nowiser United States Posted on 11/28/2005 at 09:33 PM

nowiser pic

Crap, where’s my cat o’ nine tails?  I didn’t make my heathen conversion quota for the day

Uh.  I’d just like to pre-emptively state :

I Buh-leeeve!  big surprise

(please don’t hurt me!)

 Signature 

It vexes me when they would constrain science by the authority of the Scriptures, and yet do not consider themselves bound to answer reason and experiment—Galileo

Daryl Cantrell United States Posted on 11/28/2005 at 11:50 PM

Daryl Cantrell pic

As I said before, I’m not sure what the point of your post is.  The title talks about Christmas and Easter, but your ravings mostly boil down to “Other people are Christians and I’m not and that makes me mad!!!”

Deoxy: Pagans didn’t just “Become Christians�, they were forced to accept the church, they were threatened with violence..

It’s an article of faith amongst militant atheists that no one would become Christian without being bullied or coerced.

Tell me, Deoxy: who bullied or coerced me into accepting Christ when I was 31 years old?

The Government?  Despite the “theocracy” rants of few on the left, the US government is perfectly willing to let atheists be atheists. 

My parents?  Yeah right; they go to church when I take them.

When you’re done with that, you can answer this one: Who “forced” part of the Jewish population of Jerusalem into becoming Christians during the first century?  Many of them were stoned to death by their fellow Jews over the matter.

Who “forced” the pagan peoples of Rome in the first and second centuries AD into accepting Christ?  Many of them were burned at the stake or “torn by beasts” for refusing to recant their Christian faith.

Deoxy: All these modern churches and groups are all trying to make “God� trendy and use funky Christian music and stuff to brainwash another generation..

I suppose it depends on the church.  Speaking for myself, I prefer choir music written hundreds of years ago by dead white European guys, and some Bible readings: the longer, the better.

Deoxy United States Posted on 12/01/2005 at 03:41 AM

Deoxy pic

To Theocrat,

Crap, where’s my cat o’ nine tails?  I didn’t make my heathen conversion quota for the day.

Oh yeah, I’m sorry, like I’m totally exaggerating stuff, I make Christians sound terrible! Like they capitulated with the Nazi’s or something!! Ha ha ha!

People being forced into conversion to a religion by violence, intimidation, etc. etc. - that’s all ancient history, right?

Either that or it’s all anti-Christian propaganda - the Christian church has always been there solely to look after folks, to save us all from the fiery pits of hell in the next world and to protect us all from injustice in this world.... right?

The Right-Wing Christian Bible-Belt in America are constantly trying to rewrite history. Did you hear - they are trying to rewrite the school history books to say that Hitler was an atheist and a liberal!!!

In fact, on most political forums where fundies are the mainstay of the membership, a revisionist history where all Racism is now of a liberal atheist conception is now in place.

Ha!… If it wasnt so disgustingly deceptive and false I might laugh.

“The personification of the devil as the symbol of all evil assumes the living shape of the Jew.” - Adolf Hitler, “Mein Kampf”


Hitler goes on to describe his mission to destroy the Jewish people at great length and detail, claiming that the Jewish people were not only a poison of the great nation of Deutchland, but that they were, in his opinion, the murderers of Jesus Christ which, in Hitlers opinion, justified their genocide.  He finished this tirade against the Jewish people with the words ;

“Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord.â€? - Adolf Hitler, “Mein Kampf”

They do tend to conveniently avoid any and all evidence which might “mislead” people into believing that pesky thing called “the truth of the matter” instead of their carefully crafted and G-rated version of history.

There is a very good reason why religious fundamentalism is pretty much a non-issue for the people back in my native England, and in fact Europe as a whole.  Europeans have always had a healthy level of skepticism about everything and generally they have this annoying habit of holding rational thought above religious fervour.
Europe has a long history upon which Europeans like to reflect and draw the litany of examples of why the Christian faith has not held up as a paragon of virtue or of human betterment.

In Europe we tend to do something else which is rather irritating to Conservative Christians in the United States - We don’t like to allow politically motivated groups with extremist views and anti-social tendancies (like blowing up abortion clinics and persecuting homosexuals) to rewrite our history books - and we also tend to view the history books we do have with a particular axiom in mind - it states that “History is always written by the victors”.  That means that pretty much everything to do with history that comes out of the Christian churches is suspect. 

In Europe people tend to notice and take a rather dim view of the fact that it is amongst the poorest and most poorly educated where Christianity sets its most powerful and profitable strongholds. South America is a good example of a place where the Churches are exceptionally wealthy and they are very generous with their prayers and blessings which, of course, make it entirely unnecessary for the poor to be able to afford such vain and selfish luxuries such as quality healthcare and education.

When it comes to setting up firm bastions of Christianity it also really helps if the history of the region does not reflect too accurately on the history of the Christian faith and it’s clergy.

I think 4th president of the United States of America, James Madison himself put it best when he wrote in an essay called “Memorial and Remonstrance against Religious Assessments” these words;

“During almost fifteen centuries has the legal establishment of Christianity been on trial. What have been its fruits? More or less in all places, pride and indolence in the Clergy, ignorance and servility in the laity, in both, superstition, bigotry and persecution.”

Another anti-Christian exaggerator. Wow. You mean there’s more kooks like me who have the gall to actually hold the history of the Christian faith up to the magnifying glass and take a good look at exactly how holy and riteous they really are?

But Madison died centuries ago and it’s not like the Christian Clergy have done anything shady in the last ten years… you know.. like.. well. I don’t know… pedophilia or something?

When most folks have conversations with people who arent there, and they draw all kinds of conclusions and judgements on who is good and who is bad based on what they believe they heard in those conversations ....... and then those people commit unspeakable acts, molesting children ...... and yet they have the gall to condemn other people in society for what two consenting adults do in the privacy of their own homes.... In Europe we call those people “Schizophrenics” and “Homophobic Nutcases” and we tend to arrest them and charge them with criminal acts and then lock them up in secure hospitals units for life.

For some reason in America you guys call those people things like “Father”, “Preacher” and “Your Holiness” and you donate lots of money to them and you allow them to have lots of political weight upon the community.

Here I go again - exaggerating - I make Christians sound awful - like they would burn people at the stake for having warts or something.

Ha ha ha, I’ll just get my ducking chair and find me some witches. Ha ha ha!!

Regards,

Deoxy.

THEOCRAT United States Posted on 12/02/2005 at 03:05 PM

THEOCRAT pic

Dude you have way to much time on your hands to write a response like that to a sarcastic comment.  The quote of yours I commented on is a hasty generalization.  Period.

Deoxy United States Posted on 12/03/2005 at 12:05 AM

Deoxy pic

Dude, for a guy called “Theocrat” you sure do backpedal quick when it comes to talking about issues of cruelty, aburdity, injustice, misogyny, hypocrisy, racism, genocide, faking and rewriting history, e.t.c.

With a name like that I would have thought you would have hauled out with all kinds of wacky excuses for why the Christian Church and Christian people as a whole are exempt from morality, the law, and frequently the rules set out in their own dogmatic biblical texts.

I’m very dissapointed that you haven’t hit back with all of the usual rationalizations

I do have lots of spare time. You know, between the sacrificing virgins and drinking their pure sweet blood (that’s what all non-Christians do in their spare time, right?.

Actually the reason I have lots of time is that I am still recovering from associated physical injuries including two broken legs incurred when I was purposefully run over by a large SUV from behind.

I apologize that my long reply offended you so much.

Regards,

Deoxy.

zilch Austria Posted on 12/03/2005 at 02:57 PM

zilch pic

Hey Les- elwed suggests a vowel filter for certain messages, and I think he may be on to something.  Isn’t this pithier and more poetic:

Hnstl Dv nd Ls- Y bth r s gl tht vn dmnc frcs nd dmn wld nd 12 scnd jmp t gt w frm y drk ht nd bfcl chs dwbs

 Signature 

You were born.  And so you’re free.  So happy birthday.
- Laurie Anderson

Les United States Posted on 12/03/2005 at 04:29 PM

Les pic

It could be done. EE does support filtering of comments when posting. grin

 Signature 

When one reads Bibles, one is less surprised at what the Deity knows than at what He doesn’t know.
-- Mark Twain

elwedriddsche United States Posted on 12/03/2005 at 04:39 PM

elwedriddsche pic

Full disclosure: I picked up the idea somewhere else. If you google for devowelizer, the original source may pop up. I like your idea of dropping the consonants, too. Alternate?

 Signature 

Science is answers that must always be questioned.
Philosophy is questions that may never be answered.
Religion is answers that must never be questioned.
Politics is answers that lobbyists pay for.

Richard D. LeCour United States Posted on 02/02/2008 at 12:15 AM

Richard D. LeCour pic

A link to the Devowelizer. Have fun with it!

Page 1 of 1 pages

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Smileys


Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:


<< Back to main