Testing new forum package.

Posted by Les on Tuesday, December 21, 2004 at 12:52 PM. Read 2953 times. Tags:
{name} pic

Those of you who make use of the SEB Forums know that I’ve been meaning to replace the current package in use (IPB 2.0) with something else due to the changes in the licensing for what we were using. I’ve got a test install of the SMF offering in place to see how it stands up and I’ve managed to convert all of the current messages/forums/users from IPB to SMF so you won’t have to re-register to try it out. You can try out the new forums by clicking here and signing in with the same username and password you used on our previous forums. The old forums are still in place until we decide on what we want to switch to so feel free to play with the new ones quite a bit to see how you like it.

Comments:

Page 1 of 1 pages

Greg United States Posted on 12/21/2004 at 10:00 PM

Greg pic

You’ve probably already looked in to it, but I’m using phpBB over here and I’m quite pleased w/ it.
Non-restrictive licensing (read: your not limited to x number of forums or posts if you use the free version), a plethora of styles and mods (mods are supported by phpBB developers, as they’ve provided a db for them).

John Hoke United States Posted on 12/21/2004 at 10:05 PM

John Hoke pic

Greg…

Be careful of this new phpBB exploit ... looks fairly nasty if you are not running the latest version of phpBB and PHP itself (4.3.10)

Just a heads up :(

Greg United States Posted on 12/21/2004 at 10:26 PM

Greg pic

@John
Yup. My web host upgrade to the latest PHP last weekend and I’ve got the latest phpBB version.

deadscot United States Posted on 12/21/2004 at 11:13 PM

deadscot pic

It looks sharp and the layout is intuitive.  One thing I did notice was that personal signatures were extremely large even though they aren’t tagged as such.

I look forward to the return of some of the ‘inch wide, mile deep’ discussions that took place in the forums.

Les United States Posted on 12/22/2004 at 01:27 AM

Les pic

I’ve run phpBB in the past and I’m not opposed to using it again. My only concern with it is the fact that the development has been at a glacial pace for awhile now. So I thought I’d see what some of the other forums are like before reaching a decision.

I’m pretty impressed with SMF so far.

 Signature 

When one reads Bibles, one is less surprised at what the Deity knows than at what He doesn’t know.
-- Mark Twain

nowiser United States Posted on 12/22/2004 at 02:08 AM

nowiser pic

I like the new setup, you can see a lot more threads all at once, even a lot of really old ones.

That one on Christianity and Free Will, for example; I completely missed that discussion, which is too bad, because KyndMynd poured a lot of effort into it , and there were even a few posts of David’s (easily recognizable by the amusing/insufferable attitude).

Anyway, the new setup has me stumbling across all sorts of stuff that’s basically new to me, since I didn’t check in often enough to catch it the first time around.

So, thumbs up!

 Signature 

It vexes me when they would constrain science by the authority of the Scriptures, and yet do not consider themselves bound to answer reason and experiment—Galileo

elwedriddsche United States Posted on 12/22/2004 at 08:23 AM

elwedriddsche pic

Well, you could always see the old threads on IPB if you knew about the display filters.

 Signature 

Science is answers that must always be questioned.
Philosophy is questions that may never be answered.
Religion is answers that must never be questioned.
Politics is answers that lobbyists pay for.

Les United States Posted on 12/22/2004 at 09:26 AM

Les pic

So it sounds like so far the new package is sitting well with folks? One nice thing it allows is multiple templates so if you don’t like the one set as default you can chose from others.

Should I go ahead and take IPB down at this point then?

 Signature 

When one reads Bibles, one is less surprised at what the Deity knows than at what He doesn’t know.
-- Mark Twain

nowiser United States Posted on 12/22/2004 at 02:00 PM

nowiser pic

Well, you could always see the old threads on IPB if you knew about the display filters.

Yeah, I know.  But you had to re-select the filter each time you reloaded a main topic.  Petty, I know, but I’m so lazy that the main reason I installed firefox was for mouse-gestures.

wink

 Signature 

It vexes me when they would constrain science by the authority of the Scriptures, and yet do not consider themselves bound to answer reason and experiment—Galileo

elwedriddsche United States Posted on 12/22/2004 at 07:19 PM

elwedriddsche pic

Does SMF have an ignore feature? wink

 Signature 

Science is answers that must always be questioned.
Philosophy is questions that may never be answered.
Religion is answers that must never be questioned.
Politics is answers that lobbyists pay for.

Les United States Posted on 12/22/2004 at 07:53 PM

Les pic

Not as such, but it does have an optional Karma system I could turn on.

 Signature 

When one reads Bibles, one is less surprised at what the Deity knows than at what He doesn’t know.
-- Mark Twain

Scorn Canada Posted on 12/22/2004 at 08:45 PM

Scorn pic

I’ve used a board with the karam system.  Does it have the option opt out of the system?  With some it really has to do with the types of posts they make.  With others it’s a popularity contest. It has it’s pros and cons.

elwedriddsche United States Posted on 12/22/2004 at 11:02 PM

elwedriddsche pic

Les, I was mostly kidding. The forums have never needed such a feature, but a karma system is pure evil. People get obessed about gaming the system, dissing posters, and all kinds of unpleasant behaviour results. Well, it does on the really busy forums. wink

 Signature 

Science is answers that must always be questioned.
Philosophy is questions that may never be answered.
Religion is answers that must never be questioned.
Politics is answers that lobbyists pay for.

Page 1 of 1 pages

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Smileys


Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:


<< Back to main