“Star Wars: The Force Unleashed” won’t have multiplayer on the Xbox 360 or PS3?

Posted by Les on Friday, May 16, 2008 at 01:27 PM. Read 509 times. Tags: , , , , ,
{name} pic

That’s what one LucasArts rep is telling the folks at Total Video Games during a recent Q&A. That’s not necessarily surprising as some titles will lose multiplayer before release due to time constraints on the developers, but the reasoning provided was, to put it in a single word, stupid:

TVG: As you mentioned earlier, there’s no multiplayer in the game. Was there any specific reason for this?

To be specific, there’s no multiplayer in the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3 versions, because there is on the Wii, PSP, and DS. As far as specific reasons are concerned, we don’t really like to get into the reasons why we don’t do things because I don’t think there’s really a satisfactory answer that people would really be happy with. So, there isn’t multiplayer and that’s kind of how it is…

Because the Wii, PSP, and DS versions of the game will have multiplayer they’re not going to put it into the Xbox 360 or PS3? WTF? Admittedly I can see how with the advanced physics engine being utilized on the higher end hardware it might make it difficult to implement multiplayer in a balanced way considering the ridiculously powerful force powers everyone would have. If that’s the case then just say so, but the above answer makes it sound like they expect us to buy the game twice if we want to do any kind of multiplayer. To say the least this makes me a bit less enthusiastic about buying the game at all.

Comments:

Page 1 of 1 pages

TheJynXeD United States Posted on 05/17/2008 at 11:25 AM

TheJynXeD pic

I am less than enthusiastic to begin with because there is no PC version.

 Signature 

“I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.”

-Mahatma Ghandi

VTMarik United States Posted on 05/17/2008 at 01:33 PM

VTMarik pic

Well, considering that the multiplayer on these versions is most likely a way to make up for the lack of all the advanced engines that the 360 and PS3 have, I personally don’t care. I don’t play single-player Star Wars games for the multiplayer aspect.

They could’ve put it that way, and less people would be pissed off.

JemGryphonkin United States Posted on 05/18/2008 at 12:58 AM

JemGryphonkin pic

Yey, go Wii!

Les United States Posted on 05/18/2008 at 11:35 PM

Les pic

Not sure I see how PS3 and, in particular, the 360 are lacking advanced engines, VTMarik. The 360 is just a multi-core PC which is why it’s so easy to port games between it and the PC. The PS3 has Unreal Engine III on it, among others.

 Signature 

All I know is the wine lasts longer when you don’t gotta share it with someone
All I know is my steak tastes better when I take my steak tastes better pill
-- I Feel Fantastic, Jonathan Coulton

VTMarik United States Posted on 05/19/2008 at 12:38 PM

VTMarik pic

You got my statement all backwards. I was saying that the Wii, DS, and PSP don’t have the advanced engines (Like the Digital Molecular Matter or Euphoria engines) that the 360 and PS3 versions are going to have.

And so, therefore, multiplayer is a way to make up for that.

Les United States Posted on 05/19/2008 at 01:20 PM

Les pic

Ah! Got it. Sorry about that.

 Signature 

All I know is the wine lasts longer when you don’t gotta share it with someone
All I know is my steak tastes better when I take my steak tastes better pill
-- I Feel Fantastic, Jonathan Coulton

Page 1 of 1 pages

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Smileys


Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:


<< Back to main