There’s an excellent article by Sam Harris about President Bush’s recent comments in support of teaching Intelligent Design along with Evolution in science classrooms. A small sample:
It is time that scientists and other public intellectuals observed that the contest between faith and reason is zero-sum. There is no question but that nominally religious scientists like Francis Collins and Kenneth R. Miller are doing lasting harm to our discourse by the accommodations they have made to religious irrationality. Likewise, Stephen Jay Gould’s notion of “non-overlapping magisteria” served only the religious dogmatists who realize, quite rightly, that there is only one magisterium. Whether a person is religious or secular, there is nothing more sacred than the facts. Either Jesus was born of a virgin, or he wasn’t; either there is a God who despises homosexuals, or there isn’t. It is time that sane human beings agreed on the standards of evidence necessary to substantiate truth-claims of this sort. The issue is not, as ID advocates allege, whether science can “rule out” the existence of the biblical God. There are an infinite number of ludicrous ideas that science could not “rule out,” but which no sensible person would entertain. The issue is whether there is any good reason to believe the sorts of things that religious dogmatists believe—that God exists and takes an interest in the affairs of human beings; that the soul enters the zygote at the moment of conception (and, therefore, that blastocysts are the moral equivalents of persons); etc. There simply is no good reason to believe such things, and scientists should stop hiding their light under a bushel and make this emphatically obvious to everyone.
It’s a very worthy read and something that all atheists should take heed of. We can’t just ignore the True Believers™ anymore because they’ve managed to get their silly ideas taken seriously by too much of the general public. We need to engage them and reveal just how absurd some of their arguments really are.
Found via Atheist Exposed.


















Warbi, I be lost. I tried to read that, but it was rather long and I’ve spent many hours behind the PC coding and doing Calc… give me a hand? Can you explain the relevance of the statement (and the book) to this conversation to me?