You’re never going to believe this and you’ll be SHOCKED! Yes, SHOCKED! To find out what I just found out about my own blog thanks to an email from an alert and concerned reader!
My blog has… **GASP!*** NAUGHTY WORDS ON IT!!!!
OMFG! How can that BE?!?! I never even realized it before! Oh! This is SO embarrassing!
OK, which one of you guys did this?!? It’s just
gotta be a prank one of you pulled on me, right?!?
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
Page 1 of 1 pages
Posted on 01/09/2004 at 07:44 PM 
How could somebody say something like that? As
Owner of the blog, I’m sure we can trust you, to find the obsenities that
Lowlifes try to post here, and edit it out for us. And of course,
You’d never use such words yourself.
Speaking as a long-time reader, I know that your opinions are often confrontational, but
Honestly, claims that you or others resort to profanity? Even subtley?
It isn’t fair…a fine, upstanding sitemaster like you, taking such abuse.
Truly, truly shocking
!
Oh my stars. Naughty words here at SEB?
Pray, gentle soul, thou art shitting me.
English: sometimes, the right word is just the right fucking word.
Posted on 01/09/2004 at 09:36 PM 
What naughty words upset them? Foxtrot Uniform Charlie Kilo or Charlie Uniform November Tango?
Posted on 01/10/2004 at 04:04 AM 
I’m as shocked and in as much awe as you, Les.
How could this happen?
What was their first clue? The tagline?!
Mmm, was it.. SATAN?!
Posted on 01/10/2004 at 08:13 AM 
Dear Sir, after reading the filthy words contained in your website, I have:
attempted to assassinate a President, committed adultery with a goat and purchased a novel by Charles Chricton.
I hold you personally responsible for all these acts of insanity and my spelling errors brought upon by exposure to the obscenity contained here!
You sir are the embodiment of evil :devil:
J1, that was very clever. It’ll be interesting to see how many people catch it.
Caz, took me a moment to figure yours out as well. I was thinking to myself “I don’t ever use Army-style talk on here.“
Greg, I don’t think Satan exists, but in this case I think he’d make a handy scapegoat so, yeah, it was his fault!
Tish, I can understand the first two errors of judgment, but buying a novel by Charles Chricton is going too far. Also I reserve my rights as an American citizen to avoid my responsibility in your downfall by blaming everyone else around me and filing multiple lawsuits.
Posted on 01/12/2004 at 05:54 AM
It’s hard to get a Dana Carvey “church lady” impression to come across the interweb. The fact that somebody emailed you about the foul, contemptable language that is rampant on your blog is hilarious.
Posted on 05/13/2004 at 09:49 AM 
So do we get to read the concerned reader’s email? I’m sure it would be very enlightening and/or entertaining…
Page 1 of 1 pages
Next entry: ABCDEF...great googly moogly!
Previous entry: Continuing with the memes...
Chief Troublemaker:
Les Jenkins
Politics: Liberal Independent
Religion: None (Atheist)
Age: 41
Current Logged-in Members: 7
christina,
gakker,
Gemma K,
Laage,
RDNewman,
Sweeney,
Valis,
Current Guests: 91
Total damage done so far:
Last update:
11/19/2008 10:50 am
Last comment:
11/20/2008 10:47 am
Most visitors:
729 on 09/10/2008 09:56 pm
wrote: Keep your friends close, but your enemies closer. Until Democrats can promote a candidate to beat Lieberman for his seat, it’s better to put him on as short a leash…[go]
wrote: I’m almost sorry I missed Marcus’ comment. But I alway thought NTSC stood for “not that same crap…“ Oh, and LH- it’s hard not to partially quote WC, isn’t it? …[go]
wrote: Thanks a lot, you guys. I just cleaned my monitor, and now I have to do it all over again…[go]
wrote: Very smart… treating the wrong problem… What we need is a drug that makes stupid people’s heads explode… Hey.. it’s either them or us.[go]
wrote: The bottom line is this: Atheists are miserable human beings. (Prove me wrong.) “God” is most certainly not the sole source of love, joy, friendship, steadfastness, consolation, hope. I am…[go]
wrote: The bottom line is this: Atheists are miserable human beings. (Prove me wrong.) Why? It is impossible for an atheist to enjoy the blessings of life: peace of mind, love,…[go]
wrote: Some damned amusing assertions from William with very little to back them up. I especially liked: The bottom line is this: Atheists are miserable human beings. (Prove me wrong.) Why? …[go]
wrote: Marcus’ comment appears to be spam of an unusual sort. I’m deleting it as such.[go]
wrote: Wait, Marcus… NTSC is some kind of mind-control format? I didn’t know the science of neurology was that advanced in 1953 when the National Television System Committee standard for color…[go]
wrote: As for the Quran, if I were discussing the life of Muhammad with a Muslim I WOULD give their sacred writings the benefit of the doubt so long as I…[go]
Or view all the comments.
The Democrats are still pussies. Let Lieberman off with a slap on the wrist. - (11)
Why are Americans so Stupid? - (280)
My doctor tried to prescribe this for me. It didn’t work. - (4)
SEB Mailbag: Try taking on the Catholics for a change redux. - (160)
Ending the Myth of Horus - (817)
GamePal offers MMORPG character rentals. - (37)
Keith Olbermann’s special comment on the passage of Proposition 8. - (10)
Not having a degree is about to bite me in the ass once again. - (19)
Third season of “The IT Crowd” starts this Friday. - (2)
Catholic Bishop says too much education is a bad thing. - (10)
No fucking way? Naughty words on your site? I am shocked and dismayed. It’s just too bloody bizarre. How could that sort of shit happen to you?