John McCain: So desperate to be president he’s cluess about his own opinions.

Posted by Les on Wednesday, March 21, 2007 at 03:59 PM. Read 733 times. Tags:
{name} pic

I’ve said before that there was a time that I would’ve voted for John McCain for President, that he was the only Republican I was likely to vote for anytime soon, but that all went out the window once he decided he’d do anything to become president including compromising his own core principles. First he started kissing up the Jerry Falwell despite his statements in the past critical of Falwell. Now he’s unable to answer a simple question about condoms:

Q: “I mean, I think you’d probably agree it probably does help stop it?”

Mr. McCain: (Laughs) “Are we on the Straight Talk express? I’m not informed enough on it. Let me find out. You know, I’m sure I’ve taken a position on it on the past. I have to find out what my position was. Brian, would you find out what my position is on contraception – I’m sure I’m opposed to government spending on it, I’m sure I support the president’s policies on it.”

Q: “But you would agree that condoms do stop the spread of sexually transmitted diseases. Would you say: ‘No, we’re not going to distribute them,’ knowing that?”

Mr. McCain: (Twelve-second pause) “Get me Coburn’s thing, ask Weaver to get me Coburn’s paper that he just gave me in the last couple of days. I’ve never gotten into these issues before.”

Straight Talk Express my ass. The man can’t remember what position he took on this issue? Does he seriously expect us to believe that he’s so absent minded that he needs someone to remind him what his past opinion was as opposed to checking with someone to find out what answer is the most politically expedient? Give me a fucking break.

Mr. McCain, you’re a major disappointment.

Link found via Dispatches from the Culture Wars.

Comments:

Page 1 of 1 pages

cubiclegrrl United States Posted on 03/21/2007 at 05:06 PM

cubiclegrrl pic

Hmmm...didn’t Barry Goldwater go off the deep end late in life and completely double back on some of his earlier opinions?  Must be something about Arizona.  Oh well, if it does the same to my Dad, I wouldn’t necessarily call it a bad thing…

Bahamat Great Britain (UK) Posted on 03/21/2007 at 07:05 PM

Bahamat pic

He could’ve said some undisputeable science whilst still being acceptably reserved about the issue:
‘made up: Based on the current model the data seems to imply that it does prevent STI’s, but I have questions over the potential violation to a right to life, and therefore on ethical grounds I’m against their use’

Hopefully this would please the catholics enough, but quite frankly those sperm+ovum were gonna die even if they abstained, and really there is nothing fundamentally wrong with sex for fun providing it doesn’t hurt anyone (a 3rd party - emotionally)

 Signature 

You don’t need to end all existence to end all suffering

Webs United States Posted on 03/21/2007 at 09:59 PM

Webs pic

What a turd

 Signature 

Brother Spikey Mace of Patience

Unitarian Jihad Name: Get Yours
Unitarian Jihad Background

ingolfson New Zealand (Aotearoa) Posted on 03/22/2007 at 05:43 AM

ingolfson pic

Yeah, sad. Thankfully sad enough not to get voted in.

decrepitoldfool United States Posted on 03/22/2007 at 11:06 PM

decrepitoldfool pic

Seems like the question of Condom effectiveness at preventing STD’s would be simple enough to answer by analyzing license examinations of legal prostitutes.

LuckyJohn19 Australia Posted on 03/23/2007 at 01:33 AM

LuckyJohn19 pic

Seems like the question of Condom effectiveness at preventing STD’s would be …

… logical to anyone with the courage to use his brain.
This guy is so malleable and lacking in intellect or conscience he only needs the party script to operate.
I wonder who his owner is.
Obviously he’s an honest politician - you know, the one who, when bought, stays bought.  wink

 Signature 

I’ve discovered that it all boils down to brain wiring: your brain is wired to worship magic or it isn’t, either it’s wired to utilize logic or it isn’t, either it’s analytical of myths or it isn’t.

Page 1 of 1 pages

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Smileys


Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:


<< Back to main