J.K Rowling says two characters die in last Potter book…

Posted by Les on Tuesday, June 27, 2006 at 11:13 AM. Read 1179 times. Tags:
{name} pic

.. and one of them might end up being Harry himself:

‘’I have never been tempted to kill him off before the final because I’ve always planned seven books, and I want to finish on seven books,’’ Rowling said Monday on TV here.

‘’I can completely understand, however, the mentality of an author who thinks, `Well, I’m gonna kill them off because that means there can be no non-author-written sequels. So it will end with me, and after I’m dead and gone they won’t be able to bring back the character’.’’

Rowling declined to commit herself about Harry, saying she doesn’t want to receive hate mail.
...
In her Monday interview on the ‘’Richard and Judy’’ show, Rowling said people are sometimes shocked to hear that she wrote the end of book seven before she had a publisher for the first book in the series.

‘’The final chapter is hidden away, although it’s now changed very slightly. One character got a reprieve. But I have to say two die that I didn’t intend to die,’’ she said. ‘’A price has to be paid. We are dealing with pure evil here. They don’t target extras do they? They go for the main characters. Well, I do.’’

She should know by now that she’s going to get a ton of hate mail regardless of who she kills off as each character has his or her fans, but I’m less concerned with that than I am with when the next book will be hitting store shelves. No word on that as of yet though she does say she’s well into the writing process. Meanwhile the fifth movie, Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, will be released on July 13, 2007. So at least we have that to look forward to.

Comments:

Page 1 of 1 pages

tim gueguen Canada Posted on 06/27/2006 at 11:53 AM

tim gueguen pic

Yeah, Rowling will have lots of problems from so-called fans no matter what she does.  Just look at the whining and moaning, including a rather ridiculous petition drive, when Rowling had the temerity to have Harry hook up with the “wrong” girl in the most recent book. 

But if she does kill Potter off at the end it will hardly ensure there are no non-Rowling sequels.  After all in a series dealing with magic it wouldn’t be hard at all for a future writer to come up with some convenient deus ex machina to bring Harry back from the dead.

Jayne d'Arcy United States Posted on 06/27/2006 at 02:10 PM

Jayne d'Arcy pic

Not to mention the load of fan fiction out there that would keep Harry alive.  As a Snape fan, I wouldn’t cry if Harry were killed, but if Snape gets snuffed, yeah, this 44 year old woman will toss a tantrum. lol

LuckyJohn19 Australia Posted on 06/27/2006 at 03:42 PM

LuckyJohn19 pic

LOL I read the first three books but would it be too much like dowsing the fires with gasoline if I reminded you they are fairy stories for children?

 Signature 

I’ve discovered that it all boils down to brain wiring: your brain is wired to worship magic or it isn’t, either it’s wired to utilize logic or it isn’t, either it’s analytical of myths or it isn’t.

Harry Potter United States Posted on 06/27/2006 at 05:29 PM

Harry Potter pic

I read the first three books but would it be too much like dowsing the fires with gasoline if I reminded you they are fairy stories for children?

KILL THE UNBELIEVER!! Avada Kedavra

Geise United States Posted on 06/27/2006 at 08:40 PM

Geise pic

I never could understand why these books became so popular…

Les United States Posted on 06/27/2006 at 10:23 PM

Les pic

LuckyJohn19: ...I reminded you they are fairy stories for children?

Indeed they are, but for being merely children’s fairy stories they are damned good reading.

Geise: I never could understand why these books became so popular…

See my response to John.

 Signature 

When one reads Bibles, one is less surprised at what the Deity knows than at what He doesn’t know.
-- Mark Twain

elwedriddsche United States Posted on 06/27/2006 at 10:39 PM

elwedriddsche pic

I never could understand why these books became so popular…

You and me both. I don’t follow the Cult of Harry Potter, but I’d say that the first volume or two was written as a kid’s novel, the kind that kids read just when they wean themselves from pictures on every page. When these books became an unexpected success, the publishers demanded feature creep. The books have evolved towards an older audience, the plot thickened, and major feature creep and phone book bloat set in. Whatever charm the first volumes had is long lost.

I prefer to reread Sharyn McCrumb’s Bimbos from the Death Sun to the new Potters wink

 Signature 

Science is answers that must always be questioned.
Philosophy is questions that may never be answered.
Religion is answers that must never be questioned.
Politics is answers that lobbyists pay for.

zilch Austria Posted on 06/28/2006 at 03:27 AM

zilch pic

Sure, the Harry Potter books are not great literature.  But they’re very entertaining.  Rowling’s counterfactual world is brilliantly thought out.  My daughter Rosalind was a lazy reader, especially in English, until we started reading the Harry Potter books to her, and she got too impatient with our leisurely progress and started reading them herself.

And Rowling has provided us with another good candidate to replace “atheist"- how about “muggle”?

 Signature 

You were born.  And so you’re free.  So happy birthday.
- Laurie Anderson

elwedriddsche United States Posted on 06/28/2006 at 06:30 AM

elwedriddsche pic

Zilch, I don’t begrudge anybody whatever enjoyment they get out of the Harry Potter books.

And either one of “not a theist” or “atheist” works for me. Why bother coming up with a new cutesy term?

 Signature 

Science is answers that must always be questioned.
Philosophy is questions that may never be answered.
Religion is answers that must never be questioned.
Politics is answers that lobbyists pay for.

zilch Austria Posted on 06/28/2006 at 07:53 AM

zilch pic

Why bother coming up with a new cutesy term?

How can you ask, elwed?  Was ist der Unterschied zwischen einer Ente?

 Signature 

You were born.  And so you’re free.  So happy birthday.
- Laurie Anderson

elwedriddsche United States Posted on 06/28/2006 at 08:53 AM

elwedriddsche pic

Some people like their Harry Potter, others like their hydrant spotter.

 Signature 

Science is answers that must always be questioned.
Philosophy is questions that may never be answered.
Religion is answers that must never be questioned.
Politics is answers that lobbyists pay for.

Page 1 of 1 pages

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Smileys


Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:


<< Back to main