James Robbins of NRO says “Horray for Global Warming!”

Posted by Les on Tuesday, August 08, 2006 at 02:54 PM. Read 1084 times. Tags:
{name} pic

You’ll think this is a parody, but it’s not. James Robbins of National Review Online seems to think Global Warming will come with a lot of positives:

Personally, I don’t know what all the shouting is about. Global warming is great. Granted, maybe it isn’t really happening, and if it is there are strong reasons to doubt that humans have anything to do with it. But if the world is warming, I say “bravo.” People in most parts of the globe should have no objection to a warmer, wetter climate. If the aliens were watching they’d conclude we were making our planet more habitable on purpose.

Consider the large landmasses in the northern hemisphere, say north of 55 degrees. These are very extreme climates for human habitation. A population distribution map of Canada shows most people live in a belt running along the southern border with the United States. But add global warming and vast regions would become comfortably habitable. As well, there would be more land available for cultivation. Resources would be easier to extract. True, there might be some dislocations as crops shifted northward, but so what? Economies change all the time. And imagine the land boom up the coastlines as people rushed on up for beachfront property. If global warming is real it is creating the investment opportunity of a lifetime.

His solution for the flooding that’ll take place? First, he doubts it’ll be as bad as some of the estimates, but if it happens he envisions large sea walls to keep the water out. If the worst were to come to pass that would be 25’ tall walls all along the nation’s seashore to hold the water back. You think New Orleans was a clusterfuck when the levees failed… The positive? The government will have lots of wall building work for people.

Other bonuses he mentions include the possibility of more rain forests from the wetter weather leading to more biodiversity and population gains in Massachusetts and Vermont as people migrate from the “frigid liberal northeast towards the warm conservative south” for some reason he doesn’t bother to explain. He admits that it’ll mean some extinctions, but writes that off as “bad evolutionary choices” that shouldn’t make humans feel guilty simply because we’re so adaptable. Frankly I was surprised that he appears to believe in Evolution.

There’s more idiocy in the full column, go read it and be stunned. If ever there was a perfect example of someone who just doesn’t get it this is it.

Comments:

Page 2 of 2 pages  <  1 2

Sadie Jane United States Posted on 08/10/2006 at 12:22 PM

Sadie Jane pic

Consi, I found it a little telling that, in his attempts to write off the effects of global warming, Moloch mentioned areas of the world where the inhabitants are primarily non-white (and he’s correct, of course, that these are the areas that will initially be hit the hardest). I guess I questioned whether he would be singing the same tune if the catastrophes were to be felt hardest in, say, Sweden. An inappropriate jab? Perhaps, but you could be accused of doing the same from time to time, and definitely so could Moloch.

Just sayin’.

 Signature 

Thinking is the best way to travel.

LuckyJohn19 Australia Posted on 08/10/2006 at 08:55 PM

LuckyJohn19 pic

Elwed: Moloch outed himself as a white supremacist and Stormfront member

Funny how we’re tolerant of some things but not of others.
Apparently in most gaols, paedophiles are kept in isolation coz the rest of the prison population can handle most things but not crimes against children.
They have their standards ... ... just like us.  wink

 Signature 

I’ve discovered that it all boils down to brain wiring: your brain is wired to worship magic or it isn’t, either it’s wired to utilize logic or it isn’t, either it’s analytical of myths or it isn’t.

Consigliere United States Posted on 08/11/2006 at 02:49 AM

Consigliere pic

Moloch outed himself as a white surpremacist and Stormfront member, which resulted in predictable and less than cordial responses, which prompted Moloch to try and get even more of a reaction.

Are these enough dots to connect?

Yep, that would be enough. 

Sadie:

In light of the above, not inappropriate at all.

 Signature 

To die one’s self is a thing that must be easy, & light of consequence; but to lose a part of one’s self--well, we know how deep that pang goes, we who have suffered that disaster, received that wound which cannot heal.
Mark Twain- Letter to Will Bowen, 11/4/1888

Bruno Canada Posted on 08/11/2006 at 08:08 AM

Bruno pic

I just see it as Gia pushing back.  I think we need to make a distinction between “conditions sutible for human habitation” and “conditions sutible for life”.  Even a full scale nuclear war would not eliminate the conditions sutible for life, and after the first few hunderd years (once the half life of the seious bad stuff decayed) the amount of hard radiation would be both diluted and minimized.  Still hardly sutible for human life, but there are a number of plants and animals that would thrive under these conditions.  Gia is much stronger than we are.

The only way to truely manage our environment is to get off world.  By being forced to survive in space we will be required to develop the technologies to better manage the environment here on earth.  In a closed habitat environmentalism is life or death.  On the earth it’s somebody elses problem and even if the Canadians commit to the keyoto accord the Americans can just decide it’s not going to apply to them.

If we develop these thechnologies to the point where they become common we can start using them in our own private environemnts and actually attempt the net zero state.

There is so much more to the environment and global change to “know” already species that thrive in the changed environment are expanding and mulitplying.  Gia may be using these other species to adjust for the damage caused, or it may just make the problem worse.  This issue is just as ephemeral as “god” because nobody can have a model that would account for everything that is going on, so everyone speculates.

And when it comes down to it “disaster” makes for good media attention.  And fear in the populace makes for easy government control.

decrepitoldfool United States Posted on 08/11/2006 at 09:13 AM

decrepitoldfool pic

Onceuponatime when early humans were frightened by the natural world, they personalized it - even anthropomorphisized it - to make it more comprehensible.  Lightning was thrown by the gods; illnesses were caused by spirits.  The concept of a complex environment without intention lay millennia in the future.

Future’s here now, but how hard it is to imagine an impersonal universe?  Easier to say, “Gaia”, attributing consciousness to a planet?

Well what the heck; we’re both in favor of a cleaner environment.  I guess the reasons don’t matter that much.

Page 2 of 2 pages  <  1 2

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Smileys


Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:


<< Back to main

Stupid Evil Bastard