This pretty picture, from today’s APOD, shows Venus in proximity to the December moon.
Even after the invention of the chronometer, mariners continued to use the competing method of lunar distance to determine longitude. They measured the angular distance between a bright star or planet and the closest limb of the moon to recover standard time (GMT). During the Napoleonic wars, Royal Navy ships would exchange their estimates of longitude and how they were determined. A Venus lunar was particularly valued as a cross check on their chronometers. “Scientific” Captains of that time (c. 1800) also determined time by observing occulations of Jupiter’s moons. The U.S. Navy dropped the lunar method in the early 1900s by removing the how-to from the 1911(?) edition of The American Practical Navigator.
Those were the days. (Particularly if you didn’t have to to the calculations yourself.)


















Those were the days, indeed. It’s easy to forget nowadays, where $300 will buy you a GPS device that will determine your location to an accuracy of a yard, how ephemeral (literally- “ephemerides” are tables of positions of heavenly bodies) and complex the reckoning of position used to be.
Occultations were of course valuable to determine exact time, because they didn’t depend upon reckoning of angles (not always easy from a heaving ship’s deck) and specified a pretty precise point in time. And while occultations of Jupiter’s moons occur every couple of hours, they are of course not as easily observed as an occultation of Venus, which can easily be seen with the naked eye, even with mild fog.
I hadn’t known about about the lunar reckoning method- the story of the battle between lunar observation and the chronometer is fascinating, and yet another example of our gradual substitution of technological gadgets (clocks in this case) for observations of nature (measuring angle of moon to some other body). Thanks, VernR.