Looks like Santa Claus to me.

Why not appear where everyone isn’t Christian, like China? Why the fuck in Peru? That Jesus is one crazy guy…

Maybe he smokes pot in his paradise. Hey I would not blame him. Got to make the bordom of paradise go away some how and if the way to do it is through blitzing his mind out, well, he’s got a right, I say. It was not him who decided to be born to god and some stupid virgin.

Cheers BunBun

I see a lioness that has been kicked in the jaw and top of the head by a zebra. Poor li’l kitty.

There was a movie titled “The Car” that came out in 1977. If I remember correctly, the car ends up going over a cliff at the end and the fire and smoke it from it create this demon-like face in the sky. That’s what this picture reminds me of.
I just found a review of The Car. The guy pictured at the top of the page looks like he could be related to Les.

http://www.feoamante.com/Movies/ABC/car.html

Does anyone think that the face almost looks like gandalf from LotR?

Cheers BunBun

galdalf is way cooler than jesus. heh, i thought you were talkin about les for a second

Lol. Yea, gandalf is a lot cooler than jesus. How can any one with a name like Gandalf Storm Crow not be cool? I dont know too much about LotR but I believe that is one of his many names.

Cheers BunBun

It just goes to show that if Google can’t find Jesus for you, he can’t be found at all.

I believe he can be found just fine:

Google:

Results 1 - 10 of about 22,900,000 for jesus

1) “Who is Jesus? Is Jesus Christ a Liar, A Lunatic or really Lord...”

2) Jesus Dress-Up

5) Welcome to Hollywood Jesus

HOLY SHIT!! ITS A PICTURE OF THE ZIG-ZAG MAN!

I wonder how many people here will know who the hell the Zig-Zag Man is. I only know because of my brother.

You’re all wrong (i.e. my cloud picture is better than your cloud picture.)

This is CLEARLY an image of the villan from “The Mummy” blowing a sandstorm over the region.

Its Charles Manson!  Praise!  Glory Be!

It’s a good thing everyone seems to know what jesus looks like!  Especially as there is a lack of photographic evidence.

I have to admit that I laughed for a minute or so after seeing Deus’ name show up in the new member list. And I see his avatar fits his name.

I wonder if anyone actually buys those things…

HOLY SHIT!! ITS A PICTURE OF THE ZIG-ZAG MAN!

LMFAO!!!  I think that you are on to something there, Qoayn.  It certainly does look more like him than Jesus.
Heh, Les, I like your disclaimer.
Maybe it’s the Rastafarian Jesus.

I have to admit that I laughed for a minute or so after seeing Deus’ name show up in the new member list. And I see his avatar fits his name.

I wonder if anyone actually buys those things…

“His”?  Interesting assumption.  And yes, people do buy them! 

Anyone else see Beldar Conehead?

Deus Ex Dildo’s avatar actually seems sweet on Chad’s post (see above). It seems to want to reach out and spread the love.

Well, I do think its important to help all my fellow ‘Mericans be FILLED with the Lord!

Does that mean we have to swallow too?

Oh no, no - don’t worry little boys (patting them on the head and handing them a cookie) - just accept the LOAD of the Lord.

Anal works.

Yeah, I made an assumption, but only because I could and it felt good at the time. I’m always willing to stand corrected should I end up being wrong.

Actually, Les, you used a proper grammatical convention of English.  When the gender of the person is unknown or in question, it is permissible to use the masculine pronouns as a type of neuter or null.

When the gender of the person is unknown or in question, it is permissible to use the masculine pronouns as a type of neuter or null.

Who gives a shit if its “permissible” to do it or not? Your still a dick if you play by that rule!  It was “permissible” to kill slap your wife around 60 years ago, it was permissible to make blacks stand in another line 40 years ago. “Permissible” is the refuge of the coward and asshole.

If he was assuming from my manner of speech or something that I was male, thats fine. But if it was because its “permissible” to assume I’m a shorter lived, less empathic, little-head ruled male?  Thats not cool! 

Who gives a shit if its “permissible� to do it or not?

Apparently you do, since you launched into a monologue over a simple statement of fact that was entirely devoid of judgement.  I didn’t necessarily condone or disagree with it, but merely pointed out a grammatical rule.  If you want to get up in arms about grammar, by all means knock yourself out.  While you’re at it, why don’t you petition to have the possesive form “its” receive the apostrophe instead of the contractual form “it’s”.
Also, your analogy is flawed.  Comparing actions to speech makes no sense.  If you had used an analogy… “60 years ago it was permissible to call blacks ‘niggers’” then your point would have been more apt.