Dinesh D’Souza is a vile, hateful little man whose mind is irreparably closed to any of
Mapantsula’s wisdom. Even so, Mapantsula’s words need to be read all across the nation (indeed, all across the world). D’Souza and his ilk may be a lost cause, but it is long overdue for the rest of the (less odious) populace to realize that we non-believers are every bit as human and capable of empathy as anyone else.

A terrible shame that folks should use a tragedy like this to try and score rhetorical “points.” And, truth be told, it doesn’t strike me as a very spiritual thing to do ...

A terrible shame that folks should use a tragedy like this to try and score rhetorical “points.”

Exactly.

And pushing atheism at a time when people probably need comfort -from wherever they can get it- would demonstrate a pretty serious lack of compassion.

The reason D’Souza doesn’t usually hear from atheists at times like this is that most of us (unlike him) have the sense to know when to hold our tongues.

He’s a cheeseball.

Wow, what a despicable small minded little person.
You just know he’s got a little dick when he

worked for Concerned Alumni of Princeton, a conservative organization strongly critical of coeducation, affirmative action, and campus access to birth control.

And this just puts the smegma in its place.

This thesis has been widely disputed by, among others, prominent conservatives such as Michelle Malkin and Hugh Hewitt, who contend that D’Souza openly sympathizes with Al Qaeda in The Enemy At Home, and who contend that his thesis that Muslim radicals would not hate the United States if not for cultural liberalism is a myth.

I never thought I’d agree with Shelley.