GENESIS FOR BEGINNERS

Posted by Peter Fredson on Friday, December 03, 2004 at 08:27 AM. Read 899 times. Tags: ,
{name} pic

GENESIS FOR BEGINNERS

By Peter Fredson

Deconstructed from the “Authorized by God. King James Version,” of the Book that God wrote before there were typewriters or computers nor spell-checkers. 

1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep.

What is meant by ‘in the beginning?” Was there nothing before there was something? Was the nothing like a vacuum?  Where was this God located if there was nothing? Is this God some kind of super-nothing? Was there an existence before there was existence?  If this God was eternal, infinite, bounded yet unbounded, infinitely unchanging, then what prompted the statis, the eternal nothingness, to be changed?  Was this God of nothingness impatient with the situation? If there was nothing, no light, no nothing, then what WAS there besides a somebody or a something who, or what, was actually nothing?

Was “heaven” a monolithic something, somewhere, while the earth didn’t have any shape, extension, surface, but is a something somewhere. Were there then only 2 somethings..the monolithic heaven and an earth that didn’t exist as a form, or had no substance. Or was God a something? What was “the deep?” Was it heaven, or a part of a divisible heaven?

And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.
And God had a Spirit which “moved” on some water that had not yet been mentioned as having been created.  Are there then two somethings…a God and a Spirit? Where were the “waters?” Were they previously created by this God or did he float around on them? There were only 2 somethings…heaven and earth…so where were the waters…on the earth without form and void?  Or was “the face of the waters” floating in space somewhere, separate from earth? Or were the waters someplace on or in the other something called “heaven?”

3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
Word magic is introduced here along with some divine anatomical property…the magical quality of speech.  If you say something, it happens. “I want a lollipop”, and alla-kazam I get a lollipop.  Napoleon Chagnon told us of an Indian tribe, the Yanomamo, where it was forbidden to say the name of a dead person, or they would magically reappear. Many other peoples have taboo words that, if you say them, they will come to pass. In order to say something God must have had vocal cords, with glottis, epiglottis and the rest of vocal apparatus, and must have had lungs, etc., in order to make the vocal cords vibrate and work their word magic on something.  If there was nothing, on what did the words act? 

4 And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness.
So, we have light and we have darkness, but they were mixed…like oil and water, and by speaking “let there be Light” he created light, and then he said, “Now eject the darkness out of the light and put it someplace where it won’t mix with light.” Like, mix the hydrogen with the oxygen and let’s call it water, or separate the water into hydrogen and oxygen? You certainly don’t want to get the universe wet and sticky, nor does a God want to become wet and sticky, so it’s better to separate the water and put it where it won’t get things wet.

5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.
So, around the mixture of something which he separated from some other something, he created some kind of boundary to make two separate somethings?. On one side of the magical fence there was light and on the other side there was darkness?

What Bible translators mean is that God, in English, called one something “light”, and the separated out something was called “night” but that really he never said either light or dark but something in Hebrew? Or Egyptian? Or was it in Sumerian? Hindu? Mandarin Chinese? Or didn’t it make any difference, in speaking, what the name was for something because God knew what he meant and his Ally-Kazam worked its magic on nothing, to separate nothing into two perfect somethings.

6 And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.
It is certainly wonderful word magic, to divide waters from waters by inserting a something called a firmament, like a big fence, to keep the split somethings apart.

7 And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.
And it was wonderful to make a firmament, called Heaven, and put some waters above Heaven, and equally wonderful to put the other waters under Heaven, so Heaven floated on some waters but had to worry about getting wet from the rest of the waters up above.

8 And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day.
If there was not yet a sun or moon, or lights, but just water and firmament, then how was a day reckoned? Was Time created then? Was there a time before Time? Was it a 24-hour day, or like some societies having different lengths of hours, days, months? Remember that this is an English translation and it is not certain that the firmament with the waters above and below it was actually called Heaven. A rose by any other name would smell as sweet, right? If God at one time favored the Egyptians, as their long reign would indicate, then they surely didn’t call the firmament “Heaven.”

9 And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was so.
Then scooping up the water under the firmament, he held it in his hand, while he said, “Ally-kazam, put some dry land here too.” Then he dropped the water in a nice depression that he made with his thumb. And it was so. No question about it. You just have to look at the situation today… There is Earth, and also there is the water, separated from the Earth, except when God sends Tsunamis to teach some kind of lesson. You see?

10 And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the waters called he Seas: and God saw that it was good.
So this God make a small planet, distinct from billions of other astral bodies, and put some water on it, then said, “Hey, that’s pretty good.” Or, to put it another way, he favored only Earth, and left the rest of astral bodies without water. That this story is true is shown by the fact that we haven’t found water on any other astral body. See?  Well, maybe Mars had some water in the time before time, or before God got around to making a separate Earth, but anyway he didn’t intend for the “lights” to shine for the benefit of Mars.  The Bible plainly says it was for the benefit of Earth….not for any second class hunk of rock..

11 And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so.
12 And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
13 And the evening and the morning were the third day.
Then God made vegetation before he made the sun. There was no need to mow the grass, because it wouldn’t grow anyway without sunlight or chlorophyll.

14 And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:
15 And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so.
And the reason there are stars is to give light to the earth. That’s the reason the sun was made— to give light in the day, and the moon to give a little bit lesser light at night. And behold, there is indeed a sun up there, and unless it’s very cloudy you can see a moon up there too. And it is so.

16 And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.

And god said, Let there be a sun, and let there also be a moon, and it was so. Then then he made all of the billions of other lights as an afterthought..ally kazam, and it was so. He made all of the galaxies, star clusters, black holes, meteorites.. everything. And you can still see many of them with the naked eye, and a lot more with the modern invention of the telescope. And it is so.

17 And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth,
18 And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and God saw that it was good.
And that’s the reason there is a sun and a moon and water and a firmament.  To give light upon the earth and to make sure that pesky darkness is separated from that light. Yes, the whole shebang was made to surround earth, to shed light upon it, with vegetation to feed the critters that God made, and that’s a good thing.

Comments:

Page 2 of 2 pages  <  1 2

peterfredson United States Posted on 12/06/2004 at 03:02 PM

peterfredson pic

Thanks for the comments. I do NOT mean that all prayer is absolutely useless. I agree that it can be comforting, soothing,perhap relieve some anxiety by seeming to DO something. I agree that meditation, Yoga and other techniques can be very helpful in establishing bodily harmony.
If my remarks about the priesthood seem bad-tempered it is because I have watched Benny Hinn clap dozens of believers on the forehead, see then fall on the floor, and then have Benny declare fatuously that they have been CURED of cancer or any condition known to humanity.
My argument is not with local pastors, of small churches and congregations that read their bible assiduosly and pray for peace. I wish them well.
My argument is with the BIG organizations and their computer lists of True Believers that by rhetoric can have a turnout of half a million protests to the FCC at seeing a nipple, or elect some True Believer who is trying might and main to let the fundies turn a democracy into a theocracy. If the wall of separation is torn down, as it appears will happen, then this democracy will disappear and become a fascist imperialist state. That’s the reason for protesting.

Of course, the main point of my argument against prayer is that it doesn’t work.  Why? A prayer is generally a message to an invisible intangible infinite unknownable entity to change all the laws of the universe at a whim, spontaneously. From my view, all entities are the result of human imagination.  They do not, they cannot, exist.  It there is no invisible intangible infinite unknowable entity to receive a message, then the activity is useless. At least sealing a message in a bottle, and tossing it into the ocean, sometimes reaches a human that answers. Or tying a message to a large balloon and letting it float hundreds of miles often does reach someone, not a specific addressee. But praying will not reach an invisible intangible infinite unknownable entity that has no existence. Unless it be Santa Claus.

Adam M. United States Posted on 12/06/2004 at 06:45 PM

Adam M. pic

Studies by Columbia University and Johns Hopkins indicate that prayer does have a positive effect on the health of patients, even when they don’t know they are being prayed for. The denomination of the people doing the praying also seems to be of little consequence.

I don’t think that the efficacy of prayer can be dismissed out of hand until we know more. Personally, I suspect that the people who say prayer is useless and the people who say it’s a direct request line to God are both wrong. How, why, and to what extent it really works are things it’ll take a lot more study to know for sure.

Lucifer United States Posted on 12/06/2004 at 06:54 PM

Lucifer pic

You are quoting an extremely flawed, if not outright fraudulant, study.

http://www.csicop.org/si/2004-09/miracle-study.html

zilch Austria Posted on 12/07/2004 at 07:41 AM

zilch pic

You are quoting an extremely flawed, if not outright fraudulant, study.

Yes, and it was debunked quite some time ago, if I remember correctly.  Unfortunately stuff like this takes on a life of its own, and no one pays attention to, or remembers, the debunkers, because the original story or claim panders to our desires.  We want it to be true, so it is true.  Uri Geller comes to mind… alligators in NY sewers...Elvis...GCVM.....

Adam M- thanks for pointing out that link above (your “very strange essay").  Indeed, surpassingly strange, and yet strangely compelling.  Sounds like something Nietzsche might have come up with.  At least the guy made an attempt to reconcile radioactive dating and evolution with the Bible, rather than reject them outright, like most fundies.  Most entertaining.

 Signature 

You were born.  And so you’re free.  So happy birthday.
- Laurie Anderson

Adam M. United States Posted on 12/07/2004 at 01:19 PM

Adam M. pic

Thanks for the debunking info on the Columbia study. I originally went googling for a Johns Hopkins study I’d heard of, and found the article about the Columbia and Duke (I erroneously said Hopkins above) studies instead.

I should’ve done a second layer or research to make sure the studies hadn’t been disproven since their publication. I’m afraid my biochemistry degree may be getting a bit rusty from disuse—back in my college days (man, I’m too young to say stuff like that), the extra research would’ve been a no-brainer.

What’s the word on the Duke University study mentioned in the same article? Has it been similarly debunked? I can’t do an extensive search right now since I’m at work, but a cursory one didn’t turn up anything.

Duke looks to be on an interesting path of inquiry into these matters, with its Center for Spirituality, Theology and Health headed up by Dr. Harold G. Koenig (who has some debunking credits of his own). The focus seems to be on the role of faith in health, rather than on prayer. This keeps them squarely in the realm of medicine and psychology, and out of parapsychology and metaphysics. Seems like a reasonable starting place.

It’s too bad about the Columbia study. I hope to see some real research on this in the future, since it’s a topic of interest to me. I have first-hand knowledge of a few cases where patients with faith communities praying for them or staging some other form of spiritual intervention (one was a Wiccan healing ritual) made surprising recoveries that far exceeded the projections of their doctors. In at least one case, the intervention was unknown to the patient—she was unconscious at the time it was going on.

Zilch: Glad you enjoyed the link. “Surpassingly strange, and yet strangely compelling” is a pretty good description. smile

Page 2 of 2 pages  <  1 2

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Smileys


Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:


<< Back to main

Stupid Evil Bastard