Ending the Myth of Horus

Posted by Consigliere on Monday, January 10, 2005 at 06:43 AM. Read 58187 times. Tags:
{name} pic

[Editor’s Note: It was my intent to have a reply ready before posting this, but I’ve found myself putting it off due to a busy weekend so I’m going to go ahead and post it as is. I’ll address it properly in the comments as soon as I have the opportunity though I’m sure there are several regulars who will probably be more than capable of addressing it first.]



I’ve heard repeated here several times that Horus, an Egyptian god, is carbon copy of Jesus.  The obvious implication by those that have made this statement is that Jesus is a copycat version of an earlier Egyptian deity.  The purpose of this entry is to disembowel that proposition once and for all. 

When I first heard that Horus was the inspiration for Jesus several years ago, I didn’t give it much credence because I couldn’t establish any source material for the claims.  I still can’t, but the internet is as adept at allowing anybody and everybody to pass on misinformation. 

Upon further research, I’ve concluded that this theory originated with Gerald Massey, an English poet, born 1828, died 1927.  He published primarily poems, but had an interest in Egypt.  He parlayed that interest in Egypt into several books and lectures in which he set forth the proposition that Horus was in essence the first Jesus, and Jesus was a cheap imitation.  The primary basis for his writing is the Egyptian Book of the Dead.  This is available on-line and you can easily look it up to read it yourself.  Be forewarned that forced reading of this would be an extremely efficient form of torture. 

It should be noted that Massey’s actual proposition was that Jesus was a copycat from more than just Horus.  According to Massey, Jesus was a compilation of an innumerable number of Egyptian deities.  There were over 2,000 deities who had every human and godlike characteristic one can think of, excepting Superman’s power to stop a speeding bullet.

Since Massey, there is a dearth of anybody with any credentials that has adopted a straight Horus=Jesus theory.  There is a one individual that has adopted some of Massey’s thoughts and incorporated them into a book-The Christ Conspiracy.  This appears to be the basis for the claims that I see.  The author is Acharya S.  Her website is http://www.truthbeknown.com I note that Richard Price, a noted Christ Myther, and one that I take much more seriously then Acharya, said the following:

“Those of use who uphold any version of the controversial Christ Myth theory find ourselves immediately the object not just of criticism, but even of ridicule. And it causes us chagrin to be lumped together with certain writers with whom we share the Christ Myth butt little else.....

His other criticism, like mine, is that she uses very dated sources (19th Century) who were in Price’s words “eccentrics, freethinkers, and theosophists.”

Les, I am using your post from 1/3/05 as an example of the claims because you carry more credibility than most. That said here are the claims and what I have found:

Claim #1-Horus and Jesus are born from a virgin. 

Horus’s mother is Isis.  Isis was married to Osiris.  We do not know for what length of time, but presumably the marriage was consummated.  Whether it was or wasn’t doesn’t matter though.  After Osiris is killed, Isis puts him back together again (he was hacked into 14 pieces) except for his penis which was tossed in a river or a lake.  Iris fashions a substitute penis for him, humps him and here comes Horus.  There is nothing virginal about that.

Claim #2-Both Horus and Jesus were born to a Mary and Joseph. (Seb)

As noted Isis is Horus’s mother’s name not Mary.  In addition, Seb is not Horus’s father, Osiris is.  Seb is Osiris’s father.  Further, Seb is a distinct name from Joseph.  Putting them side by side does not make them synonyms, and that appears to be what was done here.

Claim #3-Both were born of royal descent.

This is accurate.

Claim #4-Both births were announced by angels and witnessed by shepherds. 

I can find nothing that mentions that the birth of Horus was announced by an angel or witnessed by shepherds.  I have found that Horus was born in a swamp, which is a pretty unlikely place for shepherds.  In addition Acharya mentions that Horus was born in a cave.  Massey makes no mention of this, although he does represent that Mithra was born in a cave. 

Claim #5-Both were heralded by stars and angels. 

There is no star that heralded Horus’s birth nor is there any angel announcing it.  Archarya in a footnote in The Origins of Christianity indicates that that there are three stars named the three kings in Orion and then relates this to the birth of Jesus.  When we look to the stories regarding Horus, we find no star or angel announcing his birth.  To the extent that Acharya S relies upon Massey and Massey relies upon what is depicted in the panels at Luxor see (from an atheist) further regarding virgin birth and pronouncement by angels http://www.frontline-apologetics.com/carrier_luxor_inscription.htm

Claim #6-Both had later visitors (Horus-3 deities and Jesus-3 wisemen.)

There is no indication that there ever were 3 wisemen.  The bible never mentions the number of wisemen, nor is there any document that reflects 3 deities at the birth of Horus.  See the website referenced in Claim #5.

Claim #7-Both had murder plots against them. 

There is mention that Seth did want to kill Horus, and Herod wanted to kill Jesus.  so this is accurate.

Claim#8-Both came of age at 12, were baptized and their baptizers were executed. 

There is no indication that Horus was preaching in a temple when he was 12.  In fact, Massey indicates that Hours the child was depicted as a “weakling.” That doesn’t jive with story of Jesus preaching in the temple.  Again this appears to have been a confabulation from Acharya and repeated by others. 

Horus was never baptized in any of the Horus stories.  In addition, Acharya mentions that John the Baptist is actually Anup the Baptizer.  This individual is never mentioned anywhere in any Horus account.  There is not even a footnote in Archaya’s on-line work The Origins of Christianity to support this.  There is nothing.

Claim #9-Both had 12 disciples. 

According to the Horus accounts, Horus had four semi-gods that were followers.  There is some indication of 16 human followers and an unknown number of blacksmiths that went into battle with him.  Horus did not have 12 disciples. Jesus reportedly did.  Acharya failed to give a footnote to support this.

Massey points to a mural in the Book of Hades in which there are twelve reapers.  Horus is not present in this scene.  For Massey to make this connection he goes to a different scene within the same mural.  In this scene there is a picture of a god whose name is the Master of Joy.  Horus is never depicted although in other murals the artists do depict Horus.  Had the artists ascribed 12 reapers in any relation to Horus all they had to do was put Horus at the scene.  They did not. 

Claim #10-Both walked on water.

Horus didn’t, or at least there is no record that I can find that he did.  Massey does not maintain that Hours did.  Massey uses wild conjecture to connect the story of fish man, Oannes, not Horus, to Jesus.  Oannes came out of the sea during the day, and went back into the sea at night.  Massey makes the two analogous because by his calculations, Jesus walked on water during the day. 

As to Acharya, she as usual provides nothing to substantiate this. 

Claim #11-Both performed miracles. 

This is true although the miracles were different in scope and nature.

Claim #12 Both exorcised demons and raised Lazarus. 

The actual claim is that Horus raised Osiris from the dead and that the name Osiris morphed to Lazarus.  It doesn’t matter because Horus did not bring Osiris back to life.  There is no mention of this in any document regarding the story.  Horus did avenge Osiris’s death, but that did not raise Osiris from the dead. 

Claim #13-Both held a Sermon on the Mount; both were transfigured on a mountain, died by crucifixion along with two thieves and were buried in tombs where they paid a quick visit to Hell and then rose from the dead after 3 days time, both resurrections were witness by women, and both will supposedly reign for 1,000 years in the Millennium.

These are the most damning claims if they were proven true in my opinion.  Yet, I can locate none of this.  No sermon, no transfiguration, certainly no crucifixion w/ two thieves, no trip to hell and no resurrection.  There was an incident in which Horus was torn to pieces and Iris requested the crocodile god to fish him out of the water he was tossed into, which was done, but that’s it.  I am at a loss to refute this because I can not find anything to support it.

Massey does compares a story about the Autumn Equinox related to Osiris, not Horus, as the symbolic crucifixion.  There is no indication that Horus is involved in any way.  There is no mention by Massey of any Sermon on the Mount.  No mention or any actual crucifixion, no two thieves, no burial in a tomb.  Massey does not maintain that anything of the sort occurred with Horus. 

In short, of the claims outlined in this entry, I find the comparison between Horus and Jesus to consist of the following: they were of royal descent, they allegedly worked miracles and there were murder plots against them. 

Comments:

Page 3 of 32 pages « First  <  1 2 3 4 5 >  Last »

Adrienne Canada Posted on 01/13/2005 at 02:09 PM

Adrienne pic

Virgin or not?

So, when the Bible says Mary was a virgin, we assume for purposes of that story that she was.  When the Egyptian text says Isis humped Osiris after affixing a penis on him, we assume for purpose of that story that she did.  In comparing the 2 stories, which is our purpose here, we find that Mary is alleged to be a virgin and that Isis was not.  That is not a similarity.

I don’t think I will rely on what the bible says and then in turn us that to direct a discussion.
There are too many words that have been translated more than once, and very few translations are useful, literal translations.
I don’t think we have a reliable way of knowing the true intent of the writer who refered to Mary as a ‘virgin’, IF in fact that was the case. I also feel rather certain that a virgin birth is not possible. 
I just imagine that if the day should ever come that we are found and studied by the beings of another world, we’re going to look so foolish putting forth that some little human on this little planet is a “saviour” of any kind.
Worse yet, that we put a sliver of ‘faith’ in superstitious writings and the fallible humans who manufactured them.

Nunyabiz United States Posted on 01/13/2005 at 02:35 PM

Nunyabiz pic

actually I dont have to back up shit, just like you dont, You cant back up anything pertaining to your little sun god, NOTHING, yet demand absolute proof to the contrary, like i said before not going to happen, and even If I do its not going to matter one tiny bit is it?

OK, lets work this from a different angle to see if I can get either of you to realize where I see these similarities, many of them absolutely identical, and you do not. Some are similar in theme.
Number one, most all of these Pagan rituals, rites, celebrations and such are ALL virtually the same because they are all stemming from the same ideas simply passed down generation to generation from one culture to another from region to region, they are mainly Oral Traditions as told from the Elders, or the self proclaimed Shamans, Priest, or whatever alleged holyman.

Some of the information that I have gathered throughout the years would take me forever to try and hunt it all down and present it in a coherent fashion, and lets be honest here its not like its going to make a damn bit of difference anyway you know as well as I do that if you WANT to believe that Christianity is what you think it is, then that’s what its going to be regardless of whatever information is presented, that’s just the nature of the Beast, as you see when you are talking about something like “Faith & Belief” and invisible deities that can do anything anytime anywhere all with the wave of his magic wand then obviously there is no cracking that nut with any amount of valid evidence, logic & reasoning dont even come into play.

So having said that I will start by saying this, what I have FAITH & BELIEF in is tangible, it can in most cases be tested, many times from various sources, not just one, is based solely on Nature and the laws that govern it, is a product of thinking & reasoning in a logical manner.

Yes I have faith in 100s of 1000s of Scientist that have spent tireless hours researching & experimenting presenting verifiable data to fellow Scientist so that they may review it, add to it, revise it, perfect it, or if found to be flawed reject it and debunk it. THIS does not nor can not happen with Church doctrine, any evidence to the contrary is fought against tooth & nail.
No I do not have faith in ANY Clergy anywhere especially Christian which have for over 2000 years shown nothing but pure contempt for everyone that does not think precisely as they do, there are countless cases in history where Christians have done everything humanly possible to destroy any & everything non-Christian, they have taken over/stolen, or destroyed Pagan temples, destroyed entire civilizations, destroyed countless volumes of ancient text that is now lost forever, ALL in their unbridled fervor to squelch all possible opposition to their brand of insanity. The Christian church all along has made an art of forgery, lying, deceit, yet THIS shit is what you fall for?

Now back to Reality, there are many many similarities between not JUST Horus & Jesus, but virtually ALL of the Sun Gods have many similarities because they are all the same entity, all virtually the same story, just changed by region, by culture, by Time, through centuries of being told through Oral tradition in many different languages.

Take the old grade school game where the teacher whispers something in one students ear on left side of the class then says pass it on, by the time that simple sentence comes out the other side of class just a couple mins later, all speaking the same language, and just a single freaking sentence it is in the majority of attempts not even close to what the teacher said.

Now take something as complex as Religious dogma passed down through millennia, being translated through many different languages and cultures which take what they hear and “Make it their own” with their cultural differences & beliefs.

The ROOT of these SUN GODS come from Sumeria & Babylon through the stories of the Babylonian fertility god “Tammuz and the goddess Ishtar”. Every year Tammuz “was believed to die, passing away from the earth to the gloomy subterranean world.
The seasonal cycle came to be connected with Tammuz’s supposed annual death and resurrection. “Under the names of Osiris, Tammuz, Adonis, and Attis, the peoples of Egypt and Western Asia represented the yearly decay and revival of life ... which they personified as a god who annually died and rose again from the dead. In name and detail the rites varied from place to place: in substance they were the same.
Many of these rites revolved around inducing the return of Tammuz from the dead. One of these ceremonies is recorded in Ezekiel 8:14, where Ezekiel saw in vision an abominable sight: women “weeping for Tammuz” at the very temple of your particular Sun God.

As worship of Tammuz and Ishtar spread to the Mediterranean region, including the territory of biblical Israel, the pair came to be worshiped under other names: Baal and Astarte , Attis and Cybele, and Adonis and Aphrodite.

Attis was born of a “Virgin” his mother Nana was impregnated when she placed an “Almond on her breast” (Im sure in some fantastical Christian magic wand waving you are going to tell just how this isn’t considered a Virgin either) Frankly I dont give a fuck, fact is ALL of these alleged God-Men/Sun Gods were allegedly born of Virgins as told by the believers of whatever SunGod. That is simply what was believed, it was a very common belief 2000+ years ago, especially amongst believers in Sun deities of which their Virgin mothers, Sun Goddesses, Queens of Heaven, etc were all allegories for Virgo, hence allegorically were celestial Virgins regardless whether or not they may have fucked the entire Roman Legion.

There are so many similarities between so many of these Sun Gods there is no way any sane non-brainwashed individual can remotely deny it.
I personally dont give a fuck what you think about the similarities between Horus/Jesus are or aren’t, Fact is they are there, deny them all you like.

Many early Christians celebrated Jesus’ birthday on JAN-6. Armenian Christians still do. In Alexandria, in what is now Egypt, the birthday of their god-man, Aion, was also celebrated on JAN-6.

Christians and most Pagans eventually celebrated the birthday of their god-man on DEC-25, This is because of the Winter Solstice and the relation it has to the birth, rebirth, rising again of the SUN.

According to Christian tradition, Christ died on MAR-23 and resurrected on MAR-25. These dates agree precisely with the death and resurrection of Attis.

Baptism was a principal ritual; it washed away a person’s alleged sins. In some rituals, Baptism was performed by sprinkling holy water on the believer; in others, the person was totally immersed, this was a PAGAN ritual LONG before Christianity ever existed.

The most important sacrament was a ritual meal of bread and wine which symbolize the god-man’s body and blood. His followers were accused of engaging in cannibalism.

Early Christians initiated converts in March and April by baptism. Mithraism initiated their new members at this time as well.

Early Christians were naked when they were baptized. After immersion, they then put on white clothing and a crown. They carried a candle and walked in a procession to a basilica. Followers of Mithra were also baptized naked, put on white clothing and a crown, and walked in a procession to the temple. However, the only difference is they carried torches. Once again, this was many centuries prior to Christianity.

At Pentecost, the followers of Jesus were recorded as speaking in tongues. At Trophonius and Delos, the Pagan priestesses also spoke in tongues: They appeared to speak in such a way that each person present heard her words in the observer’s own language.

An inscription to Mithras reads: “He who will not eat of my body and drink of my blood, so that he will be made on with me and I with him, the same shall not know salvation.”

In John 6:53-54, Jesus is said to have repeated this almost verbatim “...Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you. Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.” Same theme obviously, just that it was attributed to Mithras centuries earlier.

The Bible allegedly records that Jesus was crucified between two thieves. One went to heaven and the other to hell. In the Mithras mysteries, a common image showed Mithras flanked by two torchbearers, one on either side. One held a torch pointed upwards, the other downwards. This symbolized ascent to heaven or descent to hell.

To worship Attis, a bull was slaughtered while on a perforated platform a “Taurobolium”.  The animal’s blood flowed down over an initiate who stood in a pit under the platform. The believer was then considered to have been “born again.” Poor people could only afford a sheep, and so were literally washed in the blood of the lamb. This practice was interpreted symbolically by Christians, centuries LATER.

There were many additional points of similarity between Mithraism and Christianity.  St. Augustine even declared that the priests of Mithraism worshipped the same God as he did:

Followers of both religions celebrated a ritual meal involving bread. It was called a missa in Latin or mass in English.

Both the Catholic church and Mithraism had a total of seven sacraments

Epiphany, JAN-6, was originally the festival in which the followers of Mithra celebrated the visit of the Magi to their newborn god-man. The Christian Church took it over in the 9th century.

Without even the slightest doubt Jews picked this Oral Tradition up during their captivity in Babylon. thus is precisely the root, the true origin of Judaism.

Celsus who lived in the late 2nd century CE complained that this recent religion of Christianity was only a “pale reflection of Pagan belief”. Celsus pointed out that Christianity copied the concepts of others. Christian “...ideas concerning the origin of the universe, etc., are common to all peoples and to the wise men of antiquity.”

Horus said: “I have given bread to the hungry man and water to the thirsty man and clothing to the naked person and a boat to the shipwrecked mariner.”

Jesus copied this with: “For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in: Naked, and ye clothed me...” Matthew 25:35-36

Horus: “I am Horus in glory...I am the Lord of Light...I am the victorious one...I am the heir of endless time...I, even I, am he that knoweth the paths of heaven.”

Christian SUN GOD: “I am the light of the world....I am the way, the truth and the life.”

Horus: “I am Horus, the Prince of Eternity.”

Jesus: “Before Abraham was, I am” ( meaning he is eternal)

Horus:"I am Horus who stepeth onward through eternity...Eternity and everlastingness is my name.”

Jesus: “Jesus Christ, the same yesterday, and today and forever.”

Horus: “I am the possessor of bread in Anu. I have bread in heaven with Ra.”

Jesus: “I am the living bread that came down from heaven.”

What about “Krishna”? yet another Sun God of which the Jesus MYTH was derived from.

Krishna was born, lived and died at least 14 centuries before Yeshua.

Yeshua and Krishna were called both a God and the Son of God. Both were sent from heaven to earth in the form of a man. Both were called Savior, and the second person of the Trinity. Both adoptive human fathers were carpenters. A spirit or ghost was their actual father. Both were visited at birth by wise men and shepherds, guided by a star. Angels in both cases issued a warning that the local dictator planned to kill the baby and had issued a decree for his assassination. The parents fled. Mary and Joseph stayed in Muturea; Krishna’s parents stayed in Mathura. Both Yeshua and Krishna withdrew to the wilderness as adults, and fasted. Jesus was called “the lion of the tribe of Judah.” Krishna was called “the lion of the tribe of Saki.” Both claimed: “I am the Resurrection.” Both referred to themselves having existed before their birth on earth. Both were “without sin.” Both were god-men: being considered both human and divine. They were both considered omniscient, omnipotent, and omnipresent. Both performed many miracles, including the healing of disease. One of the first miracles that both performed was to make a leper whole. Each cured “all manner of diseases.” Both cast out indwelling demons, and raised the dead. Both celebrated a last supper. Both forgave his enemies.  Both descended into Hell, and were resurrected.

“The object of Krishna’s birth was to bring about a victory of good over evil.” Krishna “came onto earth to cleanse the sins of the human beings.”

Krishna was born while his foster-father Nanda was in the city to pay his tax to the king.” Yeshua was born while his foster-father, Joseph, was in the city to be enumerated in a census so that “all the world could be taxed.”

Krishna: “was suspended to the branches of a tree by his murderer, to which he was nailed by the stroke of an arrow into his feet” that it might become the prey of the vultures… Basically he was “crucified” in a tree.

Yeshua’s crucifixion on a cross or stake is often referred to as being “hung on a tree:”

Acts 5:30: “The God of our fathers raised up Jesus...hanging him on a tree.

Acts 10:39: “...hanging him on a tree.”

Acts 13:29: “...they took him down from the tree...”

Galatians 3:13: “Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law, having become a curse for us; for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree.”

1 Peter 2:24: “...who his own self bare our sins in his body upon the tree...”

At least some branches of Christianity (amongst the 33,800+ of them) share the following beliefs with Hinduism.

A future reward in heaven or punishment in Hell. Hinduism and Catholicism share the concept of Purgatory.  A day of judgment. A general resurrection. The need for repentance for sin. Salvation requires faith in the Savior. A belief in angels and of evil spirits. A past war in heaven between good and bad angels. Their religious texts talk of “the blind leading the blind,” “a new heaven and a new earth, “living water,” “all scripture is given by inspiration of God,” “all scripture is profitable for doctrine,” “to die is great gain,” etc. Fasting. Being born again.

You can try to deny these similarities till yo are blue in the face but it is merely a fools folly.

http://www.livingstonemusic.net/godmen.htm

So just out of curiosity, are you trying to claim that “Only Your” particular Sun God (Jesus) in ALL of written history was the only one ever proclaimed to be born of a Virgin?  The only one ever to have died and resurrected? The only one ever to have claimed to be able to heal the sick cure the blind raise the dead? The only one ANYTHING actually as its quite clear that you cant list a single attribute of your particular Sun God that cant be attributed to at least one if not many other Sun Gods most of which pre-date Christianity by centuries.

Please say that is your claim so that I might have a good belly laugh.

Horus=Jesus, Krishna=Jesus, Osiris=Jesus, Attis=Jesus, Mithras=Jesus, and on & on & on as they are all very similar in theme & in many ways virtually Identical.

Yet still one thing you cant do is come up with Jesus=Jesus as there was not ONE single word ever written by or about your Sun God during his alleged lifetime by anybody anywhere.

This is not even a drop in the preverbal bucket for similarities, the very few things I listed here are the tip of the iceberg, there are hundreds and hundreds of them, Christianity is without the slightest doubt nothing but yet another version of much older Pagan Sun God worship.

Consigliere United States Posted on 01/13/2005 at 04:24 PM

Consigliere pic

Adrinne:  My position is dependent only on the NT alleging that there was a virgin birth, not that there was a virgin birth.  The NT does allege that.  Your article indicates clearly that the NT alleges a virgin birth. 

Nunya: 

Your entire post is unrelated to this discussion.  Let me repeat again, if you want to continute to discuss this, please pick one of the alleged similarities from my original post and substantiate it with reference to original texts.  That’s all I’m asking.  Pick just one of the similarities and substantiate it.

To All Others:

Is there anybody out there who can step forward and substantiate any of the alleged similarities between Horus and Jesus?

Regards,

 Signature 

To die one’s self is a thing that must be easy, & light of consequence; but to lose a part of one’s self--well, we know how deep that pang goes, we who have suffered that disaster, received that wound which cannot heal.
Mark Twain- Letter to Will Bowen, 11/4/1888

Socialist Swine Canada Posted on 01/13/2005 at 04:51 PM

Socialist Swine pic

Consi,

Perhaps you should read some John Shelby Spong.  He’s a retired Anglican bishop who has similar views to Nunya regarding the myth of Jesus and its relationship to the story of Horus.  This is not to say that Spong denies the historical Jesus and his role in modern Christianity.  It’s just that Spong believes that we filled in the fuzzy details of Jesus’ life with elements of pagan stories.  Also the inclusion of pagan mythos was probably a strategy of the early church to make Christianity more acceptable for the pagan western Europeans.  Indeed, similar inclusion of pagan aspects can be found in several Christian holidays such as Halloween.

Consigliere United States Posted on 01/13/2005 at 05:07 PM

Consigliere pic

SS:

I know what Nunya’s position is.  That is not the discussion here.  The only issue here is can the claims that Les posted, and that have been posted elsewhere here, be substantiated. 

I don’t care whether Krishna claimed Tone Loc stole “Funky Cold Medina” from him. It doesn’t matter.  Krishna is not part of this discussion. 

Regards,

 Signature 

To die one’s self is a thing that must be easy, & light of consequence; but to lose a part of one’s self--well, we know how deep that pang goes, we who have suffered that disaster, received that wound which cannot heal.
Mark Twain- Letter to Will Bowen, 11/4/1888

Socialist Swine Canada Posted on 01/13/2005 at 05:16 PM

Socialist Swine pic

Consi,

I think I was a little unclear, I was just aiming you at a source for references.  I think Spong makes many of the same claims that are being tossed around here.  Moreover, he’s quite good at citing sources, so if you look over one of Spong’s books such as Resurrection you might be able to find some specific references regarding the issues being discussed.

nowiser United States Posted on 01/13/2005 at 05:18 PM

nowiser pic

Adrinne:  My position is dependent only on the NT alleging that there was a virgin birth, not that there was a virgin birth.  The NT does allege that.  Your article indicates clearly that the NT alleges a virgin birth

And the BoD alleges a ‘virgin’ birth for Horus.  Either a miraculous conception, or a ‘fashioning’ of Horus from his father’s essence.

Plutarch is the one that makes a claim for a substitute phallus, and we don’t have access to the source that he used.  We are required to ‘assume’ that he is translating accurately.  For you to insist that Nunya stick to only the NT, but that you are allowed the freedom to go outside of the original Egyptian texts seems a bit disingenuous.  Particularly if you acknowledge the Classical and Medieval tradition of manufacturing/citing authoritative sources that actually don’t exist. 

At most, we can only assert that there are -multiple- accounts for Horus’ conception-- all miraculous, and one, possibly, -virginal-.

Let me be clear that I’m not ‘siding’ with Les, or nunya, or whoever originally presented the argumente that there was a one to one correspondence between Horus and Jesus.  I don’t personally think that position is tenable.  Other than the Greek and Roman pantheons, I don’t know of any culture that borrowed mythology wholesale from other cultures without ‘tweaking’ it to make it their own.

In fact, I’d be shocked if there -was- a one to one Horus/Jesus correspondence.

And even if there was a striking similarity, correlation/correspondence in myth structure doesn’t always prove cultural transmission.  If you’ve got Calad Bolg / and Caliburnus between Ireland and Wales, along with Finavair / Guinevere, and archaeological evidence of trade and intermarriage between the two cultures, that’s one thing.  I think in the case of Egyptians and Jews that the cultural transmission argument could also carry some weight, for obvious reasons.

But there are American Indian folk tales that are structurally identical to Cinderella.  That doesn’t mean that there was some sort of cultural transmission.  It just means that people have been telling stories since at least the time when they learned to make fire-- and that stories serve some sort of indispensable socio-cultural function.

I don’t know who originally made the assertion that there was a one to one correspondence between Horus and Jesus.  Les, Nunya, whoever.  But it would seem wise to me to just shrug, and concede that a one to one relationship does not exist.

Then any atheist who wanted to take up the discussion could move on to a more sustainable position, perhaps.  One where the OT/NT could be examined structurally, in comparison to a wide range of other mythological god/hero stories.

In fact, while Nunya may not have done a very good job, so far, of defending a one-one Horus/Jesus equivalence, he certainly seems to be presenting a fairly reasonable case that a lot of the OT/NT language was directly ripped from other religious traditions.  The ‘prepare a seat for me’ language in the BoD might indicate nothing more than a shared linguistic tic between Jews and Egyptians, but as textual evidence, it’s a better foundation for argument than unsourced web-sites.

But that’s just my opinion.  It’s entirely possible that I’m completely wrong.  Particularly since I’m about as good a biblical scholar as I am a brick-layer.

 Signature 

It vexes me when they would constrain science by the authority of the Scriptures, and yet do not consider themselves bound to answer reason and experiment—Galileo

Nunyabiz United States Posted on 01/13/2005 at 06:24 PM

Nunyabiz pic

Claim #1 Both Born of a Virgin, as Iv explained ad nausem this is a ridiculous claim in the first place for either entity, it can not be substantiated for EITHER one, thus technically they are Identical, I can substantiate it for Horus just as much as you can Jesus.
I also fail to see how Isis “drew from him (the dead Osiris) his essence, where from she produced her child Horus. Is in your mind considered that she rode the wild pony all night.
Many Jews, you remember them right? you know the ones whom allegedly wrote the OT/Torah/Cabal/Talmud etc of which your Sun God was based on. Well many of them believe Mary was a WHORE.
Jesus was a bastard born of adultery.” (Yebamoth 49b, p.324).
“Mary was a whore: Jesus (Balaam) was an evil man.” (Sanhedrin 106a &b, p.725).
“Jesus was a magician and a fool. Mary was an adulteress”. (Shabbath 104b, p.504).

Claim #2 Horus was born to Isis-MERI and to “Seb” as to which the connection is not the “name” but the point that both Horus & Jesus each were born of a ghost/god or had a “Heavenly father” and both had a “Earthly Father” Jesus was Joseph, Horus was Seb.
I fail to see what you are trying to discredit here.

#3 you agree.

#4 “Both births were announced by angels and witnessed by shepherds”.

I dont recall Horus being announced by angels, though he was announced by a “Bright star in the East” exactly the same as your Sun God, I dont recall Horus witnessed by Shepherds either, though he was visited by 3 Kings/Magi as it is alleged your Sun God was, the 3 Kings of course were the 3 kings on the belt of Orion for BOTH Sun Gods.
Also The followers of Zoroaster had been told earlier that Zoroaster would incarnate again on earth and the sign would be, “a great brilliant star in the East.�

#5 See 4, Both were indeed heralded by Stars, and Both by wisemen/Magi/Kings.

#6 same shit, Its all astrological which you flatly refuse to acknowledge.

#7 you agree

#8 Each had a “rite of passage� ritual.
Horus came of age with a special ritual, when his eye was restored, his age? “12�!

For Jesus, Taken by parents to the temple for what is today called a bar mitzvah ritual, his age? Why “12� of course. Hence is when they BOTH “came of age�

#9 Disciples, once again Astrological in origin for BOTH Sun Gods, the 12 Disciples are non other than the 12 signs of the Zodiac.

#10 Both walked on water of course “figuratively� just like the light of the Moon at night “walks on the water� in reflection. So does Horus & Jesus as you see these are not REAL living breathing human beings and NEVER have been they are an allegory for the SUN, thus they can figuratively walk on water, in reflection.

#11 you agree

#12 Horus raised “Asar� which is the Kemetic “Osirus� from the dead. He was referred to as “the Asar,� as a sign of respect. Translated into Hebrew, this is “El-Asar.� The Romans added the prefix “us� to indicate a male name, producing “Elasarus.� Over time, the “E� was dropped and “s� became “z,� producing “Lazarus.�

You may deny all you like, you have proven positively zilch to refute anything.
I will also state again that you can not prove a single thing about your alleged sun god either.

The similarities between all these various Sun Gods are overwhelming.

GeekMom United States Posted on 01/13/2005 at 06:47 PM

GeekMom pic

But that’s just my opinion.  It’s entirely possible that I’m completely wrong.  Particularly since I’m about as good a biblical scholar as I am a brick-layer.

In that case, nowiser, you can build a wall for me any time. grin

nowiser United States Posted on 01/13/2005 at 08:09 PM

nowiser pic

Aw shucks (blush):) .  Yer so sweet.  Not a clue how to pick a brick-layer, but sweet!

 Signature 

It vexes me when they would constrain science by the authority of the Scriptures, and yet do not consider themselves bound to answer reason and experiment—Galileo

Consigliere United States Posted on 01/14/2005 at 06:06 PM

Consigliere pic

nowiser: 

The BOD does not expressly state that Isis is a virgin.  There is a difference between a magical birth and Mary being a virgin, which the Bible does expressly state.  That said, admittedly it is possible that Isis was a virgin, unlikely, but possible nonetheless.  There is nothing to positively assert this though, unlike the Jesus story.

Furthermore, if the scenes from the temple of Opet and Dendera are accurate, they depict Osiris lying on a funeral bier, ithyphallic. An ithyphallic Osiris requires a phallus.  Where did the phallus come from if the fish ate his? Isis put it there like Plutarch said.  There’s no other account that exists that I’m aware of that explains an ithyphallic Osiris.

it would seem wise to me to just shrug, and concede that a one to one relationship does not exist.

I agree. I also agree that higher ground is not far away.

Nunya:

I’ve tried to emphasize the need to refer me to a source.  No citations, no response.

Regards,

 Signature 

To die one’s self is a thing that must be easy, & light of consequence; but to lose a part of one’s self--well, we know how deep that pang goes, we who have suffered that disaster, received that wound which cannot heal.
Mark Twain- Letter to Will Bowen, 11/4/1888

Spocko United States Posted on 01/14/2005 at 08:46 PM

Spocko pic

Consig:

Since you are so dependent on sources and “credentials”, how ‘bout providing the name of the source for your virgin story. No pseudonyms allowed and anonymous sources are obviously not to be taken seriously.

I’m postive that if the xtian fascists did not destroy every temple and scroll they came across there would be plenty of sources to cite for the tales of the Egyptian’s gods.

warbi United States Posted on 01/14/2005 at 08:57 PM

warbi pic

Yep, spocko, just like the Library of Alexandria....

Consigliere United States Posted on 01/15/2005 at 12:17 AM

Consigliere pic

Spocko:

It’s not my story or my comparison.  The comparison is being made by those who say Horus=Jesus.  I only use what texts they could possibly rely upon to make that claim. With respect to Mary being a virgin, I believe they are relying on and can find support that there is a tradition of Mary being a virgin, within Christianity, in Luke 1:26-Luke 2:7; and Matthew 1:23.

In debunking Horus=Jesus, it’s important to note that it matters not if the Bible was a complete forgery or Gospel truth.  Those making the comparisons are relying upon it for the Jesus story. So for purposes of the comparitive analysis here so shall I, as I don’t contest the Jesus portion of the comparison. 

Regards,

 Signature 

To die one’s self is a thing that must be easy, & light of consequence; but to lose a part of one’s self--well, we know how deep that pang goes, we who have suffered that disaster, received that wound which cannot heal.
Mark Twain- Letter to Will Bowen, 11/4/1888

Spocko United States Posted on 01/15/2005 at 11:31 AM

Spocko pic

Horus = fictional character from an unknown author
Jesus = fictional character from an unknown author

Horus = obvious allegory of the sun’s travels
Jesus = obvious allegory of the sun’s travels

Horus = alleged spawn of a god
Jesus = alleged spawn of a god

etc…

Jesus = Horus

Nunya has listed MANY similarities between these two fables, yet you nitpick that names are (slightly) different and some minor details have changed. So what? All plagiarists tweak the details of the story they are copying.

Nunyabiz United States Posted on 01/15/2005 at 12:25 PM

Nunyabiz pic

My point exactly Spocko.

Consig in desperation to keep his delusion alive is nit-picking every finite detail.
For a story to be a copy does not mean it has to be absolutely identical in every possibly way, every name the same, same dates, same everything.
That’s ridiculous, if that were so, then they would be the very same story, DOH!
These stories were separated by over 3000 years, different cultures, different language, different social structure, yet basically the same religious beliefs in “general” its painfully obvious that Jesus is an allegory for the Sun, it is plainly stated that Horus & Ra are Sun Gods and that the entire religion is based on Astrology. Kemet is where Christians got their “ Holy Trinity” lunacy from, their belief in an “afterlife” , their so called “Ten Commandments” etc, are ALL positively Kemetic in origin.
Without question the Bible, both OT/NT the torah, Kaballah etc. are based on Astrology.

The facts are obvious, Jesus is positively a Jewish copy of Horus, there is absolutely ZERO doubt.

Then when you look at the overall theme which you just listed there is no way any sane non brainwashed individual can deny it.

Nunyabiz United States Posted on 01/15/2005 at 01:54 PM

Nunyabiz pic

As a side to this thread, we can also look at this in reverse, which in essence accomplishes the same task.

Can pull the exact same Bull....."ENDING THE MYTH OF JESUS”

I’ve heard repeated here several times that Jesus, a Christian Sun God, is the one & only true God.  The obvious implication by those that have made this statement is that ALL other Gods are a copycat version of this deity.  The purpose of this entry is to disembowel that proposition once and for all. 
When I first heard that Jesus was the one & only true and 100% factual God several years ago, I didn’t give it much credence because I couldn’t establish any verifiable source material for the claims.  I still can’t, but the Internet is as adept at allowing anybody and everybody to pass on misinformation.

Upon further research, I’ve concluded that this “hypothesis” originated at some point in Rome by no one really knows whom, some complete Lunatic (IF he actually existed) called Saul/Paul of Tarsus we know is responsible for spreading this extremely aggressive & debilitating Meme sometime in the Mid 1st century, Saul/Paul almost certainly suffered from Temporal Lobe Epilepsy, which explains much of his writings and delusions, he was obviously quite insane. You can view his maniacal babblings (epistles) damn near anywhere you turn, Be forewarned that forced reading of this would be an extremely efficient form of torture.

There is very little verifiable evidence regarding this horrible Meme’s beginnings, there is one “hypothesis” about the Piso family in Rome being responsible for writing most if not all of the NT in an effort to curb religious fervor in Rome that was eroding away at Roman hierarchy, seeing as that this effort was covert in the first place, IF indeed there is any credence to it, plus the “known fact” that Christianity once unleashed made every possible effort to destroy any & all decent against it, then digging up clues to this hypothesis is sparse and takes a few leaps of “faith” in order to follow its path. Although I might add, having a little faith in something that at least makes some sense and does IF factual answer some otherwise unanswerable questions is more of a baby step of faith, as opposed to the supermanesk miraculous LEAP over the tallest tale one must perform in order to swallow the total absurdity of this alleged ‘Word of God” housed in a single Book so chock full of Contradictions & absurdities that the reader needs to shed his thinking & reasoning mind upon the threshold of its first page as you would shedding your muddy boots upon entry to your house.

Claim#1.  Jesus was Born of a Virgin.

There is not a single bit of verifiable evidence to support such an obviously ridiculous postulation, and amazingly this religious phenomena that was claimed by all the various 15-20 Sun Gods hasn’t happened again in at least 2000+ years.

This claim/myth is unquestionably just an allegorical Virgin Birth describing the constellation Virgo in parable form. Unfortunately many uneducated & simple minded individuals have taken this parable as a literal biography of what they have been hoodwinked into believing is a real event.

Claim#2. This Jesus god-man/Sun of God is the Earthly form of some supposed “Almighty Creator” whom allegedly waved his magic wand, spoke a few choice of Hebrew then magically “created” EVERYTHING, the Earth, Sun, Water, US, animals, trillions upon trillions of stars, no doubt Millions of Planets, Black holes, asteroids, comets, etc. etc. just *poof*.

There is not one single shred of verifiable evidence that any such *magic* was the cause of anything, let alone everything.
The basis of this “belief” comes solely from a single book whom the believers of this magic have no clue whom wrote it, as a matter of fact when anyone does honest open minded research into the true origin of this fairytale it becomes blatantly obvious that you can trace its roots to The Sumerian Tablets & Babylonian mythology.
Some believers in this Christian Mythology take this tall tale as 100% fact & literal truth I.E. “Young Earth Creationist” which as hard as it to fathom actually believe the Earth was magically created just 6-10,000 years ago, these individuals are FUBAR, need psychiatric help & medication.
Plus there are mountains of verifiable Evidence that clearly supports Evolution.

Claim#3. That this alleged god-man Jesus/Yeshua/Jeshua, The Christ, The Nazarene, “of Nazareth” etc. was sent to Earth “By HIMSELF” to walk with his children in human form & teach them, then in the end save them from themselves by “sacrificing HIMSELF to HIMSELF” to save all of mankind.

Hmmmm well just like everything else associated with Christianity there is not one single shred of verifiable evidence of anykind written by anybody anywhere that can substantiate such a ridiculous claim.
There is not a single word written BY or about this alleged god-man during his alleged lifetime, not a single word. Not much of a “teacher” is he? Even the fable/fairytale of Jesus mentions not a thing about his alleged life between the age of 12-30?
There were many many so called “Messiahs” circulating around Jerusalem in the 1st century CE, just like there still are TODAY, do you actually think these nutjobs are “Jesus”?  Well THEY do!  DOH!
There was no difference 2000 years ago except that most people back then were superstitious enough to swallow the pure deluded bullshit being spread, there are still surprisingly too many people today just that gullible & ignorant, take the Heavens Gate bunch, Jim Jones, Waco, hell for that matter every single nutcase that believes a single word Pat Robertson & his ilk spew.

There is not a single piece of verifiable evidence to support that any such god-man ever existed.
The name of “Jesus” itself could not possibly have existed as no such letter as “J” existed till no more than about 500 years ago, there is no way he could possibly have been Jesus of Nazareth as no such town of Nazareth even existed until at least 100+ years after his supposed death.
The sheer lunacy of thinking that some “Blood sacrifice” “Human Sacrifice” is going to somehow “wash your sins away” is no different in anyway from such insanity as the Aztecs sacrificing to their various gods, or as many humans today still offer blood sacrifice though usually in form of a chicken.
Then without any question the entire Bible is an Astrological Drama, with Jesus the main character as an allegory for the Sun.

http://members.cox.net/deleyd/religion/solarmyth/christ2002.htm

http://home1.gte.net/deleyd/religion/solarmyth/day.html

This fact just doesn’t get any plainer.

So that puts an end to the MYTH OF JESUS

Spocko United States Posted on 01/15/2005 at 02:53 PM

Spocko pic

The bullshit about Jezeus being born in Nazareth should be a major clue here. As mentioned above a town by this name did not exist until much later after the fable. So where did this part of the story come from? Jezeus is actually borne on the Nazaroth! This word means “the 12 signs of the zodiac”. Coincidence? I think not!

Nazareth is very closely worded to Nazaroth which in Hebrew is “the twelve signs (of the zodiac).” The root verb nazar means to “surround” as in the twelve constellations of the zodiac which pass overhead each night, thus surrounding the earth.[22] Job is reminded of his human limitations and the celestial astrological power of Yahweh, when the latter speaks to him from a raging desert whirlwind:

Canst thou bind the sweet influences of Pleiades, or loose the bands of Orion? Canst thou bring forth Nazaroth in his season?[23]

This theory is supported by the evidence that the inhabitants of Qumran by the Dead Sea, who Pliny referred to as Essenes, used a solar-based calendar, rather than the traditional lunar-based Judaic calendar. Pliny the Younger reported in a letter to the emperor Trajan in 112 CE that “Christians appear to be harmless people who meet at daybreak and sign hymns to the honor of the Christo quasi deo (the Christ as if he were a god).”

The Virgin Birth and Childhood Mysteries of Jesus

While I’m at it, here’s another excellent site to peruse…
The Jesus Heist

As crazy as all this mythology stuff is, it’s still fun to read about!

Consigliere United States Posted on 01/15/2005 at 03:25 PM

Consigliere pic

Spocko:

Nunya has listed MANY similarities between these two fables,

I would agree.  The only problem is that is all we have.  We have “Nunya On Egyptian Mythology.” Well, in actuality we have “Acharya on Egyptian Mythology as Repeated by Nunya.” If Nunya gave us the comparison between Horus and Jesus, and then cited us to a source that actually confirmed what he says, his claim most assuredly would deserve to be taken seriously.  Instead, all it is parrot posting.

Time and again, I’ve asked for Nunya to reference the sources for the comparisons he makes.  He can’t do it because he simply trolls the Net, finds some article and regurgitates it here.  I’ve not seen anything from you in this respect either.  Giving us the scholarly equivalent of “Nunaya, Nunya, go, fight, win. Yea, Nunya” does not provide substantiation. It is what it is: cheerleading. 

If you want to establish the claim that the Jesus story is a copycat of the Horus story, approach it in a serious manner so that what you say will be taken seriously.  Set forth the similarities between the two, and document for us a source that will substantiate the alleged similarity. 

I maintain it can not be done.  The fact that nobody has done it, lends credence to my position.

Regards,

 Signature 

To die one’s self is a thing that must be easy, & light of consequence; but to lose a part of one’s self--well, we know how deep that pang goes, we who have suffered that disaster, received that wound which cannot heal.
Mark Twain- Letter to Will Bowen, 11/4/1888

Nunyabiz United States Posted on 01/15/2005 at 04:56 PM

Nunyabiz pic

Consig I dont simply “Troll the Net” Iv forgotten more about this subject than you will ever know, as Iv stated Iv studied this crap for many years, I have over 80 Books in my Library downstairs regarding religion & its origins.
Iv heard of this Acharya person, I have no books of hers, I think I read one maybe 2 very sparse websites associated with her Book and that’s it.
What Iv seen of hers seems to be more of promoting sales of her Book than anything else, although she does seem to have a handle of the subject. and your allegation that she is about the only one is easily debunked there are hundreds of Authors that have written about this.

Tim Freke, Tim Leedom, Helen Elerbe, Earl Doherty, Robert Price, Ruth Green, Joseph Wheless, Bill Jenkins, Elaine Pagels, Lynn Picknet, Michael Baigent, just to name a few.

Oh and actually Iv listed several sites that have “confirmed what iv said” so has Spocko, you just deny what the sites confirm. LOL

But that’s besides the point, FACT is Iv have more than amply shown several very close similarities, many of which you even agree with, though the most damning ones are the ones you simply refuse to acknowledge, which is the absolute FACT that the Bible is positively an Astrological Drama, written in the Pagan passion play form, you refuse to even acknowledge this for the obvious reason that you know once you do, GAME OVER, your little deity is a SUN GOD, and there is no denying it at that point.

Time & time again Iv told you that you will never get the source you are looking for, even if I were to produce it you would deny it outright just like you do the Astrological origins of the bible.
Funny thing is the Bible itself which BTW is your ONE and ONLY “source material” very clearly proves itself to be Astrological in Origin.

Personally I dont give a shit, in my opinion you have been completely OWNED in this “argument”, you try desperately to Nit-pick your way out, but you are not fooling anyone but yourself.

The FACT that you constantly refuse to acknowledge the Astrological origins of the Bible, which are irrefutable, lends credence to my position.

Horus = Jesus

Mithras = Jesus

Apollo = Jesus

Krishna = Jesus

They are ALL Sun Gods, all extremely similar in many ways.
The most damning is the FACT that Jesus=Sun God.
Just like Horus = Sun God.

So Im still waiting on YOUR “source” stating that Jesus=Jesus. LOL You have ZERO.

So to YOU there is no correlation between Horus & Jesus, what similarities exist are in your mind superficial at most so you can go on believing in your chosen little sun god, there is nothing Astrological about the Bible or Torah, etc.

That is what’s called “Cognitive Dissonance” it is not that the information is not there, its just that you refuse to acknowledge it to protect your obsession.

Spocko United States Posted on 01/16/2005 at 09:07 PM

Spocko pic

If anyone is interested in learning more about this subject the best starting place would be here…

http://www.theosophical.ca/AncientEgyptIntroduction.htm

elwed: there’s a good “side-by-side” in the appendix too
http://www.theosophical.ca/AncientEgyptAppendix.htm

Massey is a little long-winded and it took some time to read but it was well worth the effort. Personally, I’m convinced beyond a shadow of doubt (and not from this one source alone) that the xtians are worshipping Horus (the Sun) and they don’t even know it. What a funny bunch of monkeys we are!

Consigliere United States Posted on 01/16/2005 at 11:26 PM

Consigliere pic

Spocko:

Are you adopting Massey’s positions en toto? 

Regards,

 Signature 

To die one’s self is a thing that must be easy, & light of consequence; but to lose a part of one’s self--well, we know how deep that pang goes, we who have suffered that disaster, received that wound which cannot heal.
Mark Twain- Letter to Will Bowen, 11/4/1888

Steve United States Posted on 01/27/2005 at 01:31 PM

Steve pic

I TOTALLY agree with Jesus = Horus = Sun God.  I have a BA degree in Church Music, minor in Christian Ed, dad is an evangelical minister, I used to be in the church until 10 yrs ago.  Then I RESEARCHED the ORIGINS of all major religions - and WOW, what I found out!!!  It is TOTALLY TRUE that all christianity REALLY goes back to worship of the sun in the sky - and all the allegorical stories about planets, stars, etc. are ALL from ancient astrology and are parallelled throughout christianity.  My whole religion must MELTED AWAY (thankfully!).  My dad says my “homosexuality” must be the reason I have rebelled, but I tell them, no, it was just the CATALYST that got me to LOOKING DEEPER into why I could not rationalize my NATURAL ORIENTATION to christianity.  WOW - did I ever found out.  I did not PLAN ON becoming an atheist/freethinker - it was the NATURAL RESULT of LEARNING AND DISCOVERY!  Thanks for listening!  Steve in Pensacola at .

Mxyzptlk United States Posted on 12/02/2005 at 09:04 PM

Mxyzptlk pic

NUNYA: Hmmmm well just like everything else associated with Christianity there is not one single shred of verifiable evidence of anykind written by anybody anywhere that can substantiate such a ridiculous claim.
There is not a single word written BY or about this alleged god-man during his alleged lifetime, not a single word.

I’m a bit late catching up on this one, but I was surprised no one challenged this statement.  It has been established that the Jewish historian Josephus made note of the existence of a real person named Jesus, and told of Jesus being put to death by crucifixion. It does not qualify as “during his alleged lifetime,” but it does have the distinction of being the only extra-biblical reference to Jesus, and a pretty solid one, given the reputation of Josephus for accuracy.

About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man.  For he was one who performed surprising deeds and was a teacher of such people as accept the truth gladly. He won over many Jews and many of the Greeks. He was the Messiah. And when, upon the accusation of the principal men among us, Pilate had condemned him to a cross, those who had first come to love him did not cease.  He appeared to them spending a third day restored to life, for the prophets of God had foretold these things and a thousand other marvels about him.  And the tribe of the Christians, so called after him, has still to this day not disappeared.
- Jewish Antiquities, 18.3.3 §63

There have been challenges to this document, but they are seriously lacking in merit.  More information is available at this outlink from the Josephus homepage:

http://members.aol.com/FLJOSEPHUS/testimonium.htm

 Signature 

Grin and bear it!

elwedriddsche United States Posted on 12/02/2005 at 09:31 PM

elwedriddsche pic

And a link right back at you:

http://www.truthbeknown.com/josephus.htm

Despite the best wishes of sincere believers and the erroneous claims of truculent apologists, the Testimonium Flavianum has been demonstrated continually over the centuries to be a forgery, likely interpolated by Catholic Church historian Eusebius in the fourth century. So thorough and universal has been this debunking that very few scholars of repute continued to cite the passage after the turn of the 19th century. Indeed, the TF was rarely mentioned, except to note that it was a forgery, and numerous books by a variety of authorities over a period of 200 or so years basically took it for granted that the Testimonium Flavianum in its entirety was spurious, an interpolation and a forgery. As Dr. Gordon Stein relates:

“...the vast majority of scholars since the early 1800s have said that this quotation is not by Josephus, but rather is a later Christian insertion in his works. In other words, it is a forgery, rejected by scholars.”

So well understood was this fact of forgery that these numerous authorities did not spend their precious time and space rehashing the arguments against the TF’s authenticity. Nevertheless, in the past few decades apologists of questionable integrity and credibility have glommed onto the TF, because this short and dubious passage represents the most “concrete” secular, non-biblical reference to a man who purportedly shook up the world. In spite of the past debunking, the debate is currently confined to those who think the TF was original to Josephus but was Christianized, and those who credulously and self-servingly accept it as “genuine” in its entirety.

To repeat--and I will be repetitious, because this spurious Josephus claim needs to be put to rest once and for all--this passage was so completely dissected by scholars of high repute and standing--the majority of them pious Christians--that it was for decades understood by subsequent scholars as having been proved in toto a forgery, such that these succeeding scholars did not even mention it, unless to acknowledge it as false. (In addition to being repetitious, I will also provide numerous quotes, because a strong show of rational consensus is desperately needed when it comes to matters of blind, unscientific and irrational faith.) The scholars who so conclusively proved the TF a forgery made their mark at the end of the 18th century and into the 20th, when a sudden reversal was implemented, with popular opinion hemming and hawing its way back first to the “partial interpolation theory” and in recent times, among the third-rate apologists, to the notion that the whole TF is “genuine.”

 Signature 

Science is answers that must always be questioned.
Philosophy is questions that may never be answered.
Religion is answers that must never be questioned.
Politics is answers that lobbyists pay for.

Page 3 of 32 pages « First  <  1 2 3 4 5 >  Last »

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Smileys


Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:


<< Back to main