Ending the Myth of Horus

Posted by Consigliere on Monday, January 10, 2005 at 07:43 AM. Read 100047 times. Tags:
{name} pic

[Editor’s Note: It was my intent to have a reply ready before posting this, but I’ve found myself putting it off due to a busy weekend so I’m going to go ahead and post it as is. I’ll address it properly in the comments as soon as I have the opportunity though I’m sure there are several regulars who will probably be more than capable of addressing it first.]


I’ve heard repeated here several times that Horus, an Egyptian god, is carbon copy of Jesus.  The obvious implication by those that have made this statement is that Jesus is a copycat version of an earlier Egyptian deity.  The purpose of this entry is to disembowel that proposition once and for all.   

When I first heard that Horus was the inspiration for Jesus several years ago, I didn’t give it much credence because I couldn’t establish any source material for the claims.  I still can’t, but the internet is as adept at allowing anybody and everybody to pass on misinformation. 

Upon further research, I’ve concluded that this theory originated with Gerald Massey, an English poet, born 1828, died 1927.  He published primarily poems, but had an interest in Egypt.  He parlayed that interest in Egypt into several books and lectures in which he set forth the proposition that Horus was in essence the first Jesus, and Jesus was a cheap imitation.  The primary basis for his writing is the Egyptian Book of the Dead.  This is available on-line and you can easily look it up to read it yourself.  Be forewarned that forced reading of this would be an extremely efficient form of torture. 

It should be noted that Massey’s actual proposition was that Jesus was a copycat from more than just Horus.  According to Massey, Jesus was a compilation of an innumerable number of Egyptian deities.  There were over 2,000 deities who had every human and godlike characteristic one can think of, excepting Superman’s power to stop a speeding bullet.

Since Massey, there is a dearth of anybody with any credentials that has adopted a straight Horus=Jesus theory.  There is a one individual that has adopted some of Massey’s thoughts and incorporated them into a book-The Christ Conspiracy.  This appears to be the basis for the claims that I see.  The author is Acharya S.  Her website is http://www.truthbeknown.com  I note that Richard Price, a noted Christ Myther, and one that I take much more seriously then Acharya, said the following:

“Those of use who uphold any version of the controversial Christ Myth theory find ourselves immediately the object not just of criticism, but even of ridicule. And it causes us chagrin to be lumped together with certain writers with whom we share the Christ Myth butt little else…..

His other criticism, like mine, is that she uses very dated sources (19th Century) who were in Price’s words “eccentrics, freethinkers, and theosophists.”

Les, I am using your post from 1/3/05 as an example of the claims because you carry more credibility than most. That said here are the claims and what I have found:

Claim #1-Horus and Jesus are born from a virgin. 

Horus’s mother is Isis.  Isis was married to Osiris.  We do not know for what length of time, but presumably the marriage was consummated.  Whether it was or wasn’t doesn’t matter though.  After Osiris is killed, Isis puts him back together again (he was hacked into 14 pieces) except for his penis which was tossed in a river or a lake.  Iris fashions a substitute penis for him, humps him and here comes Horus.  There is nothing virginal about that.

Claim #2-Both Horus and Jesus were born to a Mary and Joseph. (Seb)

As noted Isis is Horus’s mother’s name not Mary.  In addition, Seb is not Horus’s father, Osiris is.  Seb is Osiris’s father.  Further, Seb is a distinct name from Joseph.  Putting them side by side does not make them synonyms, and that appears to be what was done here.

Claim #3-Both were born of royal descent.

This is accurate.

Claim #4-Both births were announced by angels and witnessed by shepherds. 

I can find nothing that mentions that the birth of Horus was announced by an angel or witnessed by shepherds.  I have found that Horus was born in a swamp, which is a pretty unlikely place for shepherds.  In addition Acharya mentions that Horus was born in a cave.  Massey makes no mention of this, although he does represent that Mithra was born in a cave. 

Claim #5-Both were heralded by stars and angels. 

There is no star that heralded Horus’s birth nor is there any angel announcing it.  Archarya in a footnote in The Origins of Christianity indicates that that there are three stars named the three kings in Orion and then relates this to the birth of Jesus.  When we look to the stories regarding Horus, we find no star or angel announcing his birth.  To the extent that Acharya S relies upon Massey and Massey relies upon what is depicted in the panels at Luxor see (from an atheist) further regarding virgin birth and pronouncement by angels http://www.frontline-apologetics.com/carrier_luxor_inscription.htm 

Claim #6-Both had later visitors (Horus-3 deities and Jesus-3 wisemen.) 

There is no indication that there ever were 3 wisemen.  The bible never mentions the number of wisemen, nor is there any document that reflects 3 deities at the birth of Horus.  See the website referenced in Claim #5.

Claim #7-Both had murder plots against them. 

There is mention that Seth did want to kill Horus, and Herod wanted to kill Jesus.  so this is accurate.

Claim#8-Both came of age at 12, were baptized and their baptizers were executed. 

There is no indication that Horus was preaching in a temple when he was 12.  In fact, Massey indicates that Hours the child was depicted as a “weakling.”  That doesn’t jive with story of Jesus preaching in the temple.  Again this appears to have been a confabulation from Acharya and repeated by others. 

Horus was never baptized in any of the Horus stories.  In addition, Acharya mentions that John the Baptist is actually Anup the Baptizer.  This individual is never mentioned anywhere in any Horus account.  There is not even a footnote in Archaya’s on-line work The Origins of Christianity to support this.  There is nothing.

Claim #9-Both had 12 disciples. 

According to the Horus accounts, Horus had four semi-gods that were followers.  There is some indication of 16 human followers and an unknown number of blacksmiths that went into battle with him.  Horus did not have 12 disciples. Jesus reportedly did.  Acharya failed to give a footnote to support this.

Massey points to a mural in the Book of Hades in which there are twelve reapers.  Horus is not present in this scene.  For Massey to make this connection he goes to a different scene within the same mural.  In this scene there is a picture of a god whose name is the Master of Joy.  Horus is never depicted although in other murals the artists do depict Horus.  Had the artists ascribed 12 reapers in any relation to Horus all they had to do was put Horus at the scene.  They did not. 

Claim #10-Both walked on water.

Horus didn’t, or at least there is no record that I can find that he did.  Massey does not maintain that Hours did.  Massey uses wild conjecture to connect the story of fish man, Oannes, not Horus, to Jesus.  Oannes came out of the sea during the day, and went back into the sea at night.  Massey makes the two analogous because by his calculations, Jesus walked on water during the day. 

As to Acharya, she as usual provides nothing to substantiate this. 

Claim #11-Both performed miracles. 

This is true although the miracles were different in scope and nature.

Claim #12 Both exorcised demons and raised Lazarus. 

The actual claim is that Horus raised Osiris from the dead and that the name Osiris morphed to Lazarus.  It doesn’t matter because Horus did not bring Osiris back to life.  There is no mention of this in any document regarding the story.  Horus did avenge Osiris’s death, but that did not raise Osiris from the dead. 

Claim #13-Both held a Sermon on the Mount; both were transfigured on a mountain, died by crucifixion along with two thieves and were buried in tombs where they paid a quick visit to Hell and then rose from the dead after 3 days time, both resurrections were witness by women, and both will supposedly reign for 1,000 years in the Millennium.

These are the most damning claims if they were proven true in my opinion.  Yet, I can locate none of this.  No sermon, no transfiguration, certainly no crucifixion w/ two thieves, no trip to hell and no resurrection.  There was an incident in which Horus was torn to pieces and Iris requested the crocodile god to fish him out of the water he was tossed into, which was done, but that’s it.  I am at a loss to refute this because I can not find anything to support it.

Massey does compares a story about the Autumn Equinox related to Osiris, not Horus, as the symbolic crucifixion.  There is no indication that Horus is involved in any way.  There is no mention by Massey of any Sermon on the Mount.  No mention or any actual crucifixion, no two thieves, no burial in a tomb.  Massey does not maintain that anything of the sort occurred with Horus. 

In short, of the claims outlined in this entry, I find the comparison between Horus and Jesus to consist of the following: they were of royal descent, they allegedly worked miracles and there were murder plots against them. 

Comments:

Page 14 of 35 pages « First  <  12 13 14 15 16 >  Last »

thed00d Canada Posted on 06/25/2007 at 02:18 PM

thed00d pic

Bahamat, the world is what it is, and if it is all just an illusion to us then there is a God since it would take an almighty power to orchestrate all of this.

Consi, clearly this post is not what it started as and if you merely read a single comment I would say 2% adress the correct issue.
And in fact astrological similarities relate very well to horus/jesus and one dominating theory is that both (and almost every widely worhipped god) were based on the worship of the sun and all things relating. So to show how much jesus may be based on sun worhsip and astrology may give some insight to how related jesus is to other holy figures who we know are or aren’t based on atrology.
  However, it seems that next to noone (maybe zilch might be an exceptin) in this post ACTUALLY want answers or the most probable cases to any of these topics. If you think otherwise… start raising or answering some questions which could further this discussion.
Thank you

Bahamat Great Britain (UK) Posted on 06/26/2007 at 05:13 AM

Bahamat pic

thed000d: Bahamat, the world is what it is, and if it is all just an illusion to us then there is a God since it would take an almighty power to orchestrate all of this.

And we have no way of knowing whether or not it is just a dream, and no indication to pull probability away from 50:50. You’d have to wonder why, anyway something, be it the universe or a dreamer(s) must exist in order for us to exist in at least some form, and I don’t understand why anything should exist at all, because before there were rules there was no motive.

 Signature 

You don’t need to end all existence to end all suffering

thed00d Canada Posted on 06/26/2007 at 01:36 PM

thed00d pic

Bahamat, you are thinking too much. Regardless of the meaning of our existence (although i think its meaningless and we’re naught more than animals) we have to consider things in OUR world. Whether how mwe percieve things how they are or how we are meant to percieve them by some other beings… we can still find out what happened and how things work in the world as we know it, which i intend to try my best doing… with or without the help of you guys raspberry

Bahamat Great Britain (UK) Posted on 06/26/2007 at 05:15 PM

Bahamat pic

thed00d - you’re right that this world needs more attention and is the only thing we can do anything about or reach any conclusions with.

It’s difficult to relax, i’m like this partly out of boredom and so have to contemplate something (or escapism) to fill that void, even if sadness, I have to register something, and as I reached conclusions on what we did know I started to run out of (intresting) real stuff and felt (as well as not having the drive to fully persue reality) I couldn’t realistically change anything, so I cling to stuff that isn’t known because it’ll never get used up if it never reaches conclusion. It would be an upheaval if I ever learnt these things, I’d try to find a new unknown, and if that failed i’d be forced to adjust so as to overcome that need.

I won’t rest until I know everything and I won’t rest after when I have nothing left to think about. I’m buggered either way, but fortunately I can forget stuff to re-learn it later, or dream, forgetting might be a way to make eternity more bearable if that was indeed what we faced.

 Signature 

You don’t need to end all existence to end all suffering

aquarius United States Posted on 06/30/2007 at 04:20 AM

aquarius pic

I found this thread thru my interweb searching, interesting thread…

I read the first few pages and skipped to the end so if someone already pointed this out please just yell at me.

Consigliere:

I think you’re missing the point of the comparison. I dont think anyone is trying to say the stories are EXACTLY the same, but simmliar enough that someone might come to the conclusion that the bible could be a deritive work.

Lets look at #1.
If you are trying to compare the stories you can’t say they need to be exactly the same to have any simliarity. So you’re trying to argue that isis wasn’t a virgin because she might have had sex with a dildo attached to another god.

Lets just say that is true. But lets compare it using a different point of view.

Horus and Jesus were both concieved in a strange ghostly manner that did not involve a physical male sperm.

You should have to agree on this statement right? Just simply based on your previous comments.


The problem with your argument on many of your numeric breakdowns is the nature of your question. You can word the question in a way that you can’t have it answered to you accecptance.

Nunyabiz:
Nunyabiz

aquarius United States Posted on 06/30/2007 at 04:28 AM

aquarius pic

Sorry another thought that didnt get into my previous post.

The definition of what a virgin could have been translated wrong or simply had a different meaning as it did 2000 years ago.

But even from todays defition you can say that virgin means
- an unmarried girl or woman

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/virgin

So in this context it has nothing to do with not having intercorse but just being married. As I stated above virgin birth could have had the meaning of asexual reproduction.

Genni United States Posted on 07/03/2007 at 09:56 AM

Genni pic

If her hymen was popped then she wasn’t a virgin…

And I pretty sure that if I shoved something in my crotch that it would pop it.

Last_Hussar Great Britain (UK) Posted on 07/04/2007 at 07:08 PM

Last_Hussar pic

If her hymen was popped then she wasn’t a virgin…

The hymen can break with out sexual activity. Both horseriding and gymnastics have been known to do it.

 Signature 

Come and fight me, come and be my padawan.
http://last-hussar.mybrute.com

Bahamat Great Britain (UK) Posted on 07/04/2007 at 07:55 PM

Bahamat pic

Or I suppose sitting on correct shape random objects

 Signature 

You don’t need to end all existence to end all suffering

Marcus Nordquist Sweden Posted on 07/06/2007 at 06:06 PM

Marcus Nordquist pic

I am not yet convinced whether Jesus is a copy of Horus but I must say:

Nunyabiz 1 - Consigliere 0

P.S. I am an atheist D.S.

Gabriel Hungary Posted on 07/13/2007 at 08:39 AM

Gabriel pic

i don’t think one need to link one god to another in such a way as to pretend that one is the other, its copycat.
but in the same way Romans adopted Greek deities, the biblical god and characters are adaptations from earlier cultures’ religions.
Horus or Mithra were characters of earlier religions. cultures die, religions die. gods die.
no conspiracy needed.

Jlaughli United States Posted on 07/27/2007 at 10:26 PM

Jlaughli pic

Hello this has to be the most ridiculous argument. First Question would you believe something if it is not in the striat up source? No. Would you not believe something if it is not directly quoted from the source and told exactly where it is in the source? Of course not. You people are dumb for not doing this you silly gooses. Anyways Jesus is not Horus in my mind.
this is not the best source I can give but I have read the book of the dead and it stated Isis flew her wings and took shape as a bird and but 13 of the 14 peices together. From it she took his essences and implanted it in her. Now from my stand point it is not a virginal conception but it is not like the didlo thing going around. She took part of him ( He is a god he is special) and concevied a kid with it. On top of the Nepothn was part of the whole thing. Now in Luke 1:23 -1:27 you can find the virgin birth part as COnwhater said. Common truth in bible world it was pure virgin birth ( this must mean that jesus appeared in the womb not coming out to in only God could do that). On top of that Isis was not called Isis-Meri. I want striat up proof line in BOD or else you lie.  Even on top of that she was a goddess not human. human makes the virgin birth story all more a miracle. Anyone can say a goddess could create something out of nothing. This is my partake and I could be wrong but I will only change my mind if you directly show me the part in the BOD of BIBLE. Look at this site even though atheists have bias opinions on this site they actually give legitimate sources.

http://www.thedevineevidence.com/index.html

Last_Hussar Great Britain (UK) Posted on 07/27/2007 at 10:55 PM

Last_Hussar pic

Yawn… see that stuff before. Same conclusions different points, no consistency between all these sites- all say something different.
Obvious problem with this one after just 2 minutes reading

Foundation of Israel- a day means 24hrs, where as “Biblical scholars agree the interpretation of the word week represents seven years.” So the words mean what ever you want them to.

 Signature 

Come and fight me, come and be my padawan.
http://last-hussar.mybrute.com

MrJason United States Posted on 08/02/2007 at 01:45 AM

MrJason pic

aquarius almost said what I would say. In the “virgin” birth, the important point (no pun intended) is not whether it contained penetration or if the penis was really made of clay but that the event was an immaculate conception. That is, both mothers were impregnated by a divine seed, not a physical one.

Regarding Jesus’ birthday, you must also consider the historical facts: Constantine likely saved Christianity from doom. He declared it to be the official religion of Rome, partly because it afforded cultural homogeneity. Then he combined Christianity with some other pagan beliefs (ie, Sol Invictus worship), thus the birthday near the winter solstice. Interesting essay about it. There’s no other explanation for why the Pope carries a huge sun on a stick.

pope.jpg

And we must all surely know that Easter is based on the pagan worship of fertility (rabbits, eggs, etc.) and the Spring equinox, right? Isn’t resurrection really symbolic of renewal, Spring, planting a new harvest? Thank Constantine.

As for 12 disciples, there are 12 months in a year, right? And the calendar is extremely important for sun worship and crops—survival. I’m on a tangent here, but the implications are obvious: major traditions of Christianity are from older, pagan religions. And part of that heritage is to preserve critical knowledge encoded as stories. It doesn’t mean it’s wrong to believe Christianity, but you must surely have misgivings when these facts become known.

Lastly, I’d say that some of the comparisons between Horus and Jesus are indeed wrong/stretched, but there are enough striking similarities that anyone who is willing to question their “faith” would think twice about.

Bravo for examining this, though, because, although I am an atheist, I was not so sure that the parallels between Horus and Jesus were as 1:1 as claimed. That’s how I landed here. So, thanks for the discussions.

THEOCRAT United States Posted on 08/02/2007 at 02:28 AM

THEOCRAT pic

The picture is interesting because I’ve never seen that particular staff before.  Does anyone know what it is called?  I can’t seem to find anything about such a staff on wikipedia or the Catholic Encyclopedia.  Usually the pope carries a staff that displays the crucifix.  Finally, not that it matters, but a lot of Christians know that Christ wasn’t born in late december and we celebrate it because of pagan influence on early established Christian practice.  According to internal scriptural evidence Christ’s birth would more appropriately be celebrated during the latter half of September.

AjaxMinoan United States Posted on 08/08/2007 at 01:50 PM

AjaxMinoan pic

I want to say Consigliere sounds like he knows what he’s talking about. I’ve read a lot on the subject, and have been sujected to that rediculous Documentary Zeitgiest.
  Much of what Consigliere put in his first post I have read elsewhere as I’ve tried to get to the bottom of this. Saying Horus was born of a Virgin is rediculous, and that is a first sign that someone is trying to trick you.

zilch Austria Posted on 08/09/2007 at 07:35 AM

zilch pic

Saying Horus was born of a Virgin is rediculous, and that is a first sign that someone is trying to trick you.

What about saying Jesus was born of a virgin?  I’d say that’s a good sign someone is trying to trick you too…

 Signature 

You were born.  And so you’re free.  So happy birthday.
- Laurie Anderson

Lester United States Posted on 08/12/2007 at 12:37 AM

Lester pic

SEB.. (nice initial choice).

Thanks for hosting this site. I’ve been doing my own research into my own beliefs on the nature of god (if there is any). In doing so, I’ve heard this same story about Horus. Well, this kind of struck me funny because I’ve done my share of reading on God in other cultures.

Anyway, I’ve done my own searching for hard proof, and I haven’t found any. After finding your site and seeing someone else with the same problem, I feel much better about discarding this.

I don’t know, dude. I can’t understand why people would want to spread bullshit stories just to support your own comfortable ideology. People need to be responsible to their fellow man and stop spreading lies, as it does nothing but obstruct progress.

I don’t know if Jesus is real, even though my Father and Mother told me I could go to heaven and live in eternal bliss, if I believed him him. I’d like to find the truth, but the bullshit stories aren’t helping anyone, no matter which side they’re coming from.

Fuck the bullshitters,
Thanks bro,

Lester

Les United States Posted on 08/12/2007 at 09:48 AM

Les pic

That’s the problem when you’re dealing with invisible super friends, Lester. You can make up whatever bullshit story you want and no one can tell you it’s not true.

 Signature 

“Faith does not give you the answers, it just stops you asking the questions.”
- Frater Ravus

Consigliere United States Posted on 08/12/2007 at 10:47 AM

Consigliere pic

I only wanted to chime in on these two points:

1)

In the “virgin” birth, the important point (no pun intended) is not whether it contained penetration or if the penis was really made of clay but that the event was an immaculate conception. That is, both mothers were impregnated by a divine seed, not a physical one.

The Immaculate Conception as referenced in Catholic dogma does not address the virginal birth of Jesus.  The Immaculate Conception addresses Mary’s lack of original sin in her own mother’s womb, a birth resulting from sexual intercourse.  The distinction is an important one so as not to confuse any readers.

The distinction to be made between Mary’s pregnancy of Jesus and Horus is that there was no intercourse.  Mary’s Immaculate Conception would indeed be much closer to the Horus analogy, if that were the comparison being made.  However, the pundits are not making a comparison between Mary and Horus, but rather Jesus and Horus.

2)

That’s the problem when you’re dealing with invisible super friends, Lester. You can make up whatever bullshit story you want and no one can tell you it’s not true.

True, but even the most casual comic book reader knows that Aquaman and Superman are not one in the same when the texts of their respective comic books are laid side by side.  So, sure one can write their own comic book that says Aquaman and Superman are the same.  It doesn’t hold water though when the basis for which the writer of such a comic book claims to rely upon for support are examined. In that instance, bullshit can be called.

 Signature 

To die one’s self is a thing that must be easy, & light of consequence; but to lose a part of one’s self—well, we know how deep that pang goes, we who have suffered that disaster, received that wound which cannot heal.
Mark Twain- Letter to Will Bowen, 11/4/1888

Bahamat Great Britain (UK) Posted on 08/12/2007 at 06:38 PM

Bahamat pic

Lester: I’ve been doing my own research into my own beliefs on the nature of god (if there is any).

Supposing he existed I think the best thing you can do is put yourself in his sandals - why would you make a universe? Why would you prefer people to be happy? How/why do you exist yourself? Would you feel loneliness or boredom? If so, how would you deal with it? Why is there imperfection in human nature? Why would you care about the activity of mortals? Would you want people to worship you? Would you lie, decieve or trap if it better achieved your goals, even with ultimately good intentions? Would you desire people’s trust to achieve that trickery or to just make things more comfortable?

You certainly can’t expect to just be given answers from organized religion, you formulate your own theories and explanations. Think deep (unlike a fundie). Best o’ luck t’ya

 Signature 

You don’t need to end all existence to end all suffering

Andrew Englezos Australia Posted on 08/31/2007 at 11:05 PM

Andrew Englezos pic

Wow, what an epic thread.
So no-one could back up any further claims that Horus=Jesus with proper sources, other than the three that Consigliere conceded to?

If you have a claim to make, refer us to the spot in the two original sources that we are comparing.  (eg. Bible verse vs BOD image or passage).

Its irrelevant whether the sources are true or not. We are merely comparing what the two stories are saying.

Consig, respect to you for not getting angry at people constantly changing the argument. I would have given up after the first page!

eric d United States Posted on 09/04/2007 at 02:27 PM

eric d pic

i don’t know if you guys saw this already…

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b3/LuxorAmenhetep.gif

“Image from the temple at Luxor, depicting Amenhotep III applying to his own human wife the legend of Thoth announcing to Neith (the primordial waters) that she would become pregnant with Ra (the king of heaven), the actual impregnation delivered by Kneph and Hathor via the ankh, leaving Neith “ever virgin”, the subsequent birth over a birth brick, and the praise raised to the child by her courtiers and the gods. The form of Ra at this point was Ra-Amun, who was becoming identified as Horus. The child, that is consequently described as being Ra/Horus, went on to become Akhenaten.” 

I’ve heard this somewhere else…so i looked it up.

eric d United States Posted on 09/04/2007 at 02:47 PM

eric d pic

oh yeah…why does the whole jesus = horus thing…why does it have to be absolute?  we have gods that predate jesus that have similar stories like mithras for example or dionysus…can’t be jesus’ story be a combination of everything…a story that covers all grounds…one that answers all doubt?

Devilution Belgium Posted on 09/05/2007 at 05:45 AM

Devilution pic

Most of you americans know so little (nothing personal, I like america), always trying to find a consperacy/hidden truth behind everything, just another crazy trend to keep yourself busy thinking you KNOW things, but actually you guys know nothing… have fun searching for the truth as only a few select group of ppl will ever know the real truth wink

Page 14 of 35 pages « First  <  12 13 14 15 16 >  Last »

Not sure if you should comment? Here's some guidelines to consider.

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

<< Back to main