Ending the Myth of Horus

Posted by Consigliere on Monday, January 10, 2005 at 06:43 AM. Read 53840 times. Tags:
{name} pic

[Editor’s Note: It was my intent to have a reply ready before posting this, but I’ve found myself putting it off due to a busy weekend so I’m going to go ahead and post it as is. I’ll address it properly in the comments as soon as I have the opportunity though I’m sure there are several regulars who will probably be more than capable of addressing it first.]



I’ve heard repeated here several times that Horus, an Egyptian god, is carbon copy of Jesus.  The obvious implication by those that have made this statement is that Jesus is a copycat version of an earlier Egyptian deity.  The purpose of this entry is to disembowel that proposition once and for all. 

When I first heard that Horus was the inspiration for Jesus several years ago, I didn’t give it much credence because I couldn’t establish any source material for the claims.  I still can’t, but the internet is as adept at allowing anybody and everybody to pass on misinformation. 

Upon further research, I’ve concluded that this theory originated with Gerald Massey, an English poet, born 1828, died 1927.  He published primarily poems, but had an interest in Egypt.  He parlayed that interest in Egypt into several books and lectures in which he set forth the proposition that Horus was in essence the first Jesus, and Jesus was a cheap imitation.  The primary basis for his writing is the Egyptian Book of the Dead.  This is available on-line and you can easily look it up to read it yourself.  Be forewarned that forced reading of this would be an extremely efficient form of torture. 

It should be noted that Massey’s actual proposition was that Jesus was a copycat from more than just Horus.  According to Massey, Jesus was a compilation of an innumerable number of Egyptian deities.  There were over 2,000 deities who had every human and godlike characteristic one can think of, excepting Superman’s power to stop a speeding bullet.

Since Massey, there is a dearth of anybody with any credentials that has adopted a straight Horus=Jesus theory.  There is a one individual that has adopted some of Massey’s thoughts and incorporated them into a book-The Christ Conspiracy.  This appears to be the basis for the claims that I see.  The author is Acharya S.  Her website is http://www.truthbeknown.com I note that Richard Price, a noted Christ Myther, and one that I take much more seriously then Acharya, said the following:

“Those of use who uphold any version of the controversial Christ Myth theory find ourselves immediately the object not just of criticism, but even of ridicule. And it causes us chagrin to be lumped together with certain writers with whom we share the Christ Myth butt little else.....

His other criticism, like mine, is that she uses very dated sources (19th Century) who were in Price’s words “eccentrics, freethinkers, and theosophists.”

Les, I am using your post from 1/3/05 as an example of the claims because you carry more credibility than most. That said here are the claims and what I have found:

Claim #1-Horus and Jesus are born from a virgin. 

Horus’s mother is Isis.  Isis was married to Osiris.  We do not know for what length of time, but presumably the marriage was consummated.  Whether it was or wasn’t doesn’t matter though.  After Osiris is killed, Isis puts him back together again (he was hacked into 14 pieces) except for his penis which was tossed in a river or a lake.  Iris fashions a substitute penis for him, humps him and here comes Horus.  There is nothing virginal about that.

Claim #2-Both Horus and Jesus were born to a Mary and Joseph. (Seb)

As noted Isis is Horus’s mother’s name not Mary.  In addition, Seb is not Horus’s father, Osiris is.  Seb is Osiris’s father.  Further, Seb is a distinct name from Joseph.  Putting them side by side does not make them synonyms, and that appears to be what was done here.

Claim #3-Both were born of royal descent.

This is accurate.

Claim #4-Both births were announced by angels and witnessed by shepherds. 

I can find nothing that mentions that the birth of Horus was announced by an angel or witnessed by shepherds.  I have found that Horus was born in a swamp, which is a pretty unlikely place for shepherds.  In addition Acharya mentions that Horus was born in a cave.  Massey makes no mention of this, although he does represent that Mithra was born in a cave. 

Claim #5-Both were heralded by stars and angels. 

There is no star that heralded Horus’s birth nor is there any angel announcing it.  Archarya in a footnote in The Origins of Christianity indicates that that there are three stars named the three kings in Orion and then relates this to the birth of Jesus.  When we look to the stories regarding Horus, we find no star or angel announcing his birth.  To the extent that Acharya S relies upon Massey and Massey relies upon what is depicted in the panels at Luxor see (from an atheist) further regarding virgin birth and pronouncement by angels http://www.frontline-apologetics.com/carrier_luxor_inscription.htm

Claim #6-Both had later visitors (Horus-3 deities and Jesus-3 wisemen.)

There is no indication that there ever were 3 wisemen.  The bible never mentions the number of wisemen, nor is there any document that reflects 3 deities at the birth of Horus.  See the website referenced in Claim #5.

Claim #7-Both had murder plots against them. 

There is mention that Seth did want to kill Horus, and Herod wanted to kill Jesus.  so this is accurate.

Claim#8-Both came of age at 12, were baptized and their baptizers were executed. 

There is no indication that Horus was preaching in a temple when he was 12.  In fact, Massey indicates that Hours the child was depicted as a “weakling.” That doesn’t jive with story of Jesus preaching in the temple.  Again this appears to have been a confabulation from Acharya and repeated by others. 

Horus was never baptized in any of the Horus stories.  In addition, Acharya mentions that John the Baptist is actually Anup the Baptizer.  This individual is never mentioned anywhere in any Horus account.  There is not even a footnote in Archaya’s on-line work The Origins of Christianity to support this.  There is nothing.

Claim #9-Both had 12 disciples. 

According to the Horus accounts, Horus had four semi-gods that were followers.  There is some indication of 16 human followers and an unknown number of blacksmiths that went into battle with him.  Horus did not have 12 disciples. Jesus reportedly did.  Acharya failed to give a footnote to support this.

Massey points to a mural in the Book of Hades in which there are twelve reapers.  Horus is not present in this scene.  For Massey to make this connection he goes to a different scene within the same mural.  In this scene there is a picture of a god whose name is the Master of Joy.  Horus is never depicted although in other murals the artists do depict Horus.  Had the artists ascribed 12 reapers in any relation to Horus all they had to do was put Horus at the scene.  They did not. 

Claim #10-Both walked on water.

Horus didn’t, or at least there is no record that I can find that he did.  Massey does not maintain that Hours did.  Massey uses wild conjecture to connect the story of fish man, Oannes, not Horus, to Jesus.  Oannes came out of the sea during the day, and went back into the sea at night.  Massey makes the two analogous because by his calculations, Jesus walked on water during the day. 

As to Acharya, she as usual provides nothing to substantiate this. 

Claim #11-Both performed miracles. 

This is true although the miracles were different in scope and nature.

Claim #12 Both exorcised demons and raised Lazarus. 

The actual claim is that Horus raised Osiris from the dead and that the name Osiris morphed to Lazarus.  It doesn’t matter because Horus did not bring Osiris back to life.  There is no mention of this in any document regarding the story.  Horus did avenge Osiris’s death, but that did not raise Osiris from the dead. 

Claim #13-Both held a Sermon on the Mount; both were transfigured on a mountain, died by crucifixion along with two thieves and were buried in tombs where they paid a quick visit to Hell and then rose from the dead after 3 days time, both resurrections were witness by women, and both will supposedly reign for 1,000 years in the Millennium.

These are the most damning claims if they were proven true in my opinion.  Yet, I can locate none of this.  No sermon, no transfiguration, certainly no crucifixion w/ two thieves, no trip to hell and no resurrection.  There was an incident in which Horus was torn to pieces and Iris requested the crocodile god to fish him out of the water he was tossed into, which was done, but that’s it.  I am at a loss to refute this because I can not find anything to support it.

Massey does compares a story about the Autumn Equinox related to Osiris, not Horus, as the symbolic crucifixion.  There is no indication that Horus is involved in any way.  There is no mention by Massey of any Sermon on the Mount.  No mention or any actual crucifixion, no two thieves, no burial in a tomb.  Massey does not maintain that anything of the sort occurred with Horus. 

In short, of the claims outlined in this entry, I find the comparison between Horus and Jesus to consist of the following: they were of royal descent, they allegedly worked miracles and there were murder plots against them. 

Comments:

Page 2 of 32 pages  <  1 2 3 4 >  Last »

GeekMom United States Posted on 01/11/2005 at 12:53 PM

GeekMom pic

Well, as I see it, if you’re using a penis (living or dead) to impregnate yourself, you ain’t no virgin.  Just sayin’.

Nunyabiz United States Posted on 01/11/2005 at 01:07 PM

Nunyabiz pic

Well as I see if you are being impregnated with a Ghost living or dead, you aint no Virgin either.

Now unless you have a video of the “divine event” showing the waving of the perverbial magic dongwand then there isn’t anything some Christian can spew that is going to change that either.

and once again, the ONLY way you can have what anyone might call a “Virgin Birth” which lets face it, is pathetically absurd to begin with, is for this Virginal undertaking to be purely allegorical, which is exactly what BOTH are, they are Astrological tales of Virgo giving Birth to the Sun.

GeekMom United States Posted on 01/11/2005 at 01:40 PM

GeekMom pic

Not quite.  Those little buggers can actually swim their way to the egg from outside the vagina if you’re not careful, so if there was no intercourse and no rupture of the hymen, you could still be called a virgin in the strict sense.

But nobody wants to hear about the technicalities of divine seed being spilled ... wink

jonesy United States Posted on 01/11/2005 at 02:45 PM

jonesy pic

But nobody wants to hear about the technicalities of divine seed being spilled

“And the Spirit did prematurly blow his wad upon Mary’s belly...” Book of Hefner 6:66

Sorry, had to do it.

Consigliere United States Posted on 01/11/2005 at 02:51 PM

Consigliere pic

Adrienne:  I have seen comparisons of the two, but am unable to address the veracity of those claims.  Hopefully, at some point, I can speak to such claims.  The sole purpose of this thread was to prevent the cutting and pasting allegations that Horus=Jesus when there is no substantiation for such claims.

Nunya: The only thing relevant is what each text says.  What does the BOD say and what does the Bible say.  The veracity of each is completely irrelevant.  Our only issue is whether Jesus is a copycat of Horus. 

So, when the Bible says Mary was a virgin, we assume for purposes of that story that she was.  When the Egyptian text says Isis humped Osiris after affixing a penis on him, we assume for purpose of that story that she did.  In comparing the 2 stories, which is our purpose here, we find that Mary is alleged to be a virgin and that Isis was not.  That is not a similarity.

We also have found that Horus’s mother was not named Mary. Hourus’s father was not named Joseph.  We have now dispelled claim #2.

You have modified the claim and said that Seb is analgous to Joseph.  That is different than the claim put forth in Les’s account, but I will address it.

If you read Plate II from BOD, you will find that Seb(also known as Geb) is the father of Osiris, not Horus.  Furthermore, it is clearly apparent that Seb is an Egyptian god.  When we refer to Luke in the bible, Joseph is clearly not a god.  He is clearly human.  The analogy fails.

Claim #2 has been dispelled.

Claim #3 is accurate.  The first similarity between Jesus and Horus is that the were of royal lineage.

Nunya adds a claim that Horus and Jesus were born in a cave.  This has no basis in the text with respect to Horus.  This has no basis in the text with respect to Jesus.

Absent a referral to the BOD or Pyramid Texts, this claim may be dismissed.  Is there any reference anyone has found to Horus being born in a cave?

Regards,

 Signature 

To die one’s self is a thing that must be easy, & light of consequence; but to lose a part of one’s self--well, we know how deep that pang goes, we who have suffered that disaster, received that wound which cannot heal.
Mark Twain- Letter to Will Bowen, 11/4/1888

Brock United States Posted on 01/11/2005 at 02:55 PM

Brock pic

I’ve become convinced that Christianity was inspired by man’s desire to give birth, borne from jealousy of women who could. Birth, or rebirth in this case, trumps any conception the lowly woman could manage and you know those early Catholics: they couldn’t stand for a woman to be better than, or even just as good as, any man.

 Signature 

“At six I was left an orphan.  What the hell is a six year old supposed to do with an orphan?”
Unknown

GeekMom United States Posted on 01/11/2005 at 03:04 PM

GeekMom pic

Well, yes, Brock, and that also explains circumcision (a blood rite to mimic the women’s).  God was invented to have more power over life and death than women did so that men could “speak for him.” As far as I know, that was the first religion that made such a big deal of chastity ... (I may be wrong.  Consi?)

Nunyabiz United States Posted on 01/11/2005 at 03:08 PM

Nunyabiz pic

Consig going by your requirements there is no substantial evidence whatsoever that Jesus=Jesus.

There is not one single shred of verifiable evidence to support the bullshit claimed in the Bible.
So that settles that.

Consigliere United States Posted on 01/11/2005 at 03:25 PM

Consigliere pic

Whether the bible is bullshit or not, does not matter.  This issue, should be approached the same whether one is an atheist or theist.  Put the texts side by side and compare them.

All I am doing is a comparison of texts to determine if the claims that you and others here have made stand up.  The claim at issue, again is that Horus=Jesus.  That is the only issue here.  So far, it is clear that there are only 3 similarities. 

If you have texts or hieroglypics that you can reference that I am not including, please, please, feel free to contribute them and point out the similarities between the two.  Absent that, I will continue to go through the claims one at time, and dispel each of those claims as lacking any textual support. 

Regards,

 Signature 

To die one’s self is a thing that must be easy, & light of consequence; but to lose a part of one’s self--well, we know how deep that pang goes, we who have suffered that disaster, received that wound which cannot heal.
Mark Twain- Letter to Will Bowen, 11/4/1888

THEOCRAT United States Posted on 01/11/2005 at 04:54 PM

THEOCRAT pic

Originally posted by Nunyabiz:
Now even though I certainly dont believe anything about Astrology doesn’t mean that I can not connect the dots and see that it is obviously the root of Christianity, matter of fact its most likely why most Atheist can connect the dots while those infected with the Meme of Christianity can not.

Originally posted by Nunyabiz:
Until you acknowledge the FACT that what we are talking about here are mere stories, allegories then there is hardly much reason to continue running around the same bush till we turn to butter, will be just like the old Creation Vs Evolution argument, I can put forth volumes of evidence giving proof for Evolution, yet all you need to do is deny it all and keep believing in fairytales and we are still where we started.

So if a person were to try and provide enough evidence to at least give you reason to doubt that which you claim to “know” where would they start?  Your mind seems to be made up and entirely not open to anything we could possibly present.  Thirty years of research seems to equate a perfect knowledge of history in regards to religion on your part.  I don’t believe that, but I seem to have a hard time getting enough respect from you to even consider anything I have to say.  So as we have done a decent job at dispelling your Apollonius conspiracy, and at least have provided arguments to dispel a lot of the claims you now make about the similarities between ancient religion = the entire falsity of Christianity the question comes up where are we supposed to start providing arguments to challenge your knowledge?

You give no credence to astrology, but you use it as evidence to believe Christianity is a hoax.  So if we disprove your similarities what does it matter because Christianity is already a fairy tale.  I don’t think it is a fairy tale and I can’t prove it to you because you won’t consider any evidence that it isn’t.  So what are we going to do?  This discussion relies on the ability of all parties to keep an open mind to all evidence presented.  What we do and where we go with this thread depends on both parties allowing what they “know” to be able to be challenged and to be able to concede when they have no answer to an allegation.  Nunyabiz answer these questions:  Where do I have to start with my evidence to give you reason to doubt what you “know”?  Can you open you mind enough to allow the possibility of any evidence presented in defense of the Christian “fairy tale” to allow an intelligent and rational debate where we don’t have to degrade to ad hominem attacks as you have been so willing to do in your last few posts?  I have no interest in following this topic if I can’t get cooperation on those questions.

Consigliere United States Posted on 01/11/2005 at 04:59 PM

Consigliere pic

GM:

I don’t know about circumcision as a blood rite.  As to chastity, I do know that before the Catholic emphasis on chastity, that there were other reiligions that emphasized chastity, most notably, Buddhism.  (See the 5 precepts) However, the influence upon the early Church was likely the Essenes who were strict about everything.  The fun kids they were not.

Regards,

 Signature 

To die one’s self is a thing that must be easy, & light of consequence; but to lose a part of one’s self--well, we know how deep that pang goes, we who have suffered that disaster, received that wound which cannot heal.
Mark Twain- Letter to Will Bowen, 11/4/1888

Consigliere United States Posted on 01/11/2005 at 05:10 PM

Consigliere pic

Theocrat:  we....provided arguments to dispel a lot of the claims you now make about the similarities between ancient religion = the entire falsity of Christianity

Whoa, partner!!  Don’t overstep the bounds of what is happening here.  All that is happening in this thread is that we are finding out by a comparison of the texts that Jesus is not a copy of Horus.

So far we have examined only Egyptian texts, no others. The thread does not address other ancient relgions, just Egyptian mythology as it relates to Horus.  Nor does it prove or disprove the validity or falsity of Christianity. 

Please, please, don’t overstate the positions in this thread, or it will go to hell in a handbasket very quickly.

Regards,

 Signature 

To die one’s self is a thing that must be easy, & light of consequence; but to lose a part of one’s self--well, we know how deep that pang goes, we who have suffered that disaster, received that wound which cannot heal.
Mark Twain- Letter to Will Bowen, 11/4/1888

Nunyabiz United States Posted on 01/11/2005 at 06:15 PM

Nunyabiz pic

So as we have done a decent job at dispelling your Apollonius conspiracy,

You haven’t dispelled squat concerning Apollonius , actually there was nothing to dispel, all Iv ever mentioned about him is the possibility that he could be the role model used for the Jesus character, and the only other thing I even presented as a mere hypothesis, mind you a hypothesis with AT LEAST as much evidence as any source in the Bible, which is extremely sparse was the “Piso” hypothesis. Which is somewhat of a stretch although does make some sense, and does answer a few questions that otherwise are unanswerable, but none the less eminently more believable than talking snakes, and miracle working Sun Gods.  So not much I can see for you to pat yourself on the back for.

So if a person were to try and provide enough evidence to at least give you reason to doubt that which you claim to “know? where would they start?

Depends on what the hell you are talking about.

If you mean to try to convince me that Christianity has any more credence than the tooth fairy then dont waste your time, I can assure you that in the years I have studied this there is NOTHING you could possibly present that is going to make any difference at all, unless you come up magically with your little invisible friend and flap your arms over to my house and knock on the door, anything short of that and you are wasting your breath on me.
Iv seen all the evidence I need to see.

If you mean that not only JUST Horus but in fact most ALL of the various SUN GODS are very similar and obviously copies of each other, then wasting your breath there also, Iv seen all I need to see, I KNOW positively the Bible is an Astrological Drama based on much older Sumerian & Babylonian Paganism, the story in the Bible follows the Zodiac perfectly, and Jesus is without question an allegory for the Sun in that story, there is no mistaking it, is the ONLY way the Bible even makes a lick of sense, & it fits perfectly, so once again short of producing your mythical little Sun God in the flesh there is no way in hell you are going to change my mind on anything.

But, at least Im honest about it, I know damn well I couldn’t convince either of you that Christianity is Bullshit no matter what evidence I come up with, this whole debate will never change anyone’s mind on either side.

You give no credence to astrology, but you use it as evidence to believe Christianity is a hoax

LOL, you dont quite follow the logic here do ya?

Its quite simple really, I have proven to MY SATISFACTION that Christianity like many other Religions are based on Astrology & much older Paganism, No I dont give Astrology any credence, what exactly does that have to do with the fact that Christianity is based on it?  Absolutely NOTHING, what does it have to do with the fact that Christianity is a Hoax? Absolutely EVERYTHING, I have proven to MY SATISFACTION, (Not yours as that is beyond impossible)that Christianity is based on Astrology & Numerology of much older Paganism, thus BOTH in MY VIEW are utter Bullshit.

I don’t think it is a fairy tale and I can’t prove it to you because you won’t consider any evidence that it isn’t.

Quite the contrary, I would gladly consider ALL the evidence, as I have for 30 years so far and as yet have not seen ONE single solitary shred of verifiable evidence that could ever lead me to believe such absurdity.
Its like the old saying, “outrageous claims need to be backed/proven with outrageous evidence” and I got news for ya, you dont got squat.

Where do I have to start with my evidence to give you reason to doubt what you “know?? 

Easy show me Verifiable evidence, not belief & faith in something that I can prove to ME is based on ancient Paganism from 3000++ Years ago.

If you have ANY evidence at all then Spill the beans man, WTF are you holding back for? Iv yet to hear or see anything at all and believe me Iv looked and looked hard, which btw is exactly why Im an Atheist.

Can you open you mind enough to allow the possibility of any evidence presented in defense of the Christian “fairy tale? to allow an intelligent and rational debate where we don’t have to degrade to ad hominem attacks as you have been so willing to do in your last few posts?  I have no interest in following this topic if I can’t get cooperation on those questions.

Dude, I actually respect the way you are presently your case here, I really do, honestly Both you and Consig are a pretty rare bred of Christian as very very few are capable of even the most infantile reasoning, yet the 2 of you are like a contradiction, you seem rather intelligent, capable of rational thought, yet you believe in something that clearly does not exist.

nowiser United States Posted on 01/11/2005 at 06:39 PM

nowiser pic

When the Egyptian text says Isis humped Osiris after affixing a penis on him, we assume for purpose of that story that she did

Could someone please please please point me to, or quote from, the relevant portion of the BoD, where Isis fashions a clay dildo and precedes to ride the ‘arisen’ Osiris?!?!?

I’d agree that a clay dildo rather dispels the notion of virginity,* but I’m not going to reread the entire BoD to find that little kiblet.

*(I keep thinking of the Seinfeld where he gets caught picking his nose, and keeps protesting ‘there was no penetration!")

 Signature 

It vexes me when they would constrain science by the authority of the Scriptures, and yet do not consider themselves bound to answer reason and experiment—Galileo

nowiser United States Posted on 01/11/2005 at 06:51 PM

nowiser pic

She sought him untiringly, she wandered round and round about this
earth in sorrow, and she alighted not without finding him. She made light with her feathers, she
created air with her wings, and she uttered the death wail for her brother. She raised up the
inactive members of whose heart was still, she drew from him his essence, she made an heir,
she reared the child in loneliness, and the place where he was not known, and he grew in
strength and stature, and his hand was mighty in the House of Keb. The Company of the Gods
rejoiced, rejoiced, at the coming of Horus, the son of Osiris, whose heart was firm, the
triumphant, the son of Isis, the heir of Osiris.

From the Budge translation of BoD.

There’s no clay cock in here.  Where’s the clay cock coming from?

(Words I could never have imagined coming out of my own mouth).

 Signature 

It vexes me when they would constrain science by the authority of the Scriptures, and yet do not consider themselves bound to answer reason and experiment—Galileo

THEOCRAT United States Posted on 01/11/2005 at 07:00 PM

THEOCRAT pic

Originally posted by Nunyabiz:
Dude, I actually respect the way you are presently your case here, I really do, honestly Both you and Consig are a pretty rare bred of Christian as very very few are capable of even the most infantile reasoning, yet the 2 of you are like a contradiction, you seem rather intelligent, capable of rational thought, yet you believe in something that clearly does not exist.

Then please respectfully humor us and teach us otherwise.  Like you have studied the disproof for Christianity, we have studied the proof for Christianity.  Each of us have likely studied some of the proof and disproof for the otherside as well.  I don’t know everything you have studied, but it is unfair to reguire me to follow your academic footsteps.  I need to be enlightened by people who know more than I in order for me to learn what they have.  I wouldn’t know where to start in doing the research to make your conclusions.  We think differently and because we do so it would be easier to go about this if we can both respectfully answer each other as fellow intelligent human beings.  I will admit when i am wrong when I can’t create a counterargument.  I need to know it is within your ability to do the same.

Consigliere United States Posted on 01/11/2005 at 07:59 PM

Consigliere pic

Nowiser:

I don’t know that the penis was clay, some believe it was made of gold.  Anyway, the only coherent and complete version of the Osiris myth comes from Plutarch, a Greek writer, who wrote Isis and Osiris.  The individual accounts contained in BOD, the Pyramid texts, and Luxor hieroglyphics have confirmed most of what Plutarch wrote, and have led to the belief that Plutarch was working from original texts and his account can likely be trusted as at least one version of the myth. 

Nunya is right in suggesting that piecing together the totality of the Egyptian mythology is difficult, because we are forced to cobble together what those beliefs were from such things as pottery shards.  Which makes it that much more incredible that one would extrapolate Horus=Jesus. 

Regards,

 Signature 

To die one’s self is a thing that must be easy, & light of consequence; but to lose a part of one’s self--well, we know how deep that pang goes, we who have suffered that disaster, received that wound which cannot heal.
Mark Twain- Letter to Will Bowen, 11/4/1888

Pop Tarts United States Posted on 01/12/2005 at 10:06 AM

Pop Tarts pic

There is one underlying question that is not asked during this discussion.

A) What is the effect of the “carbon copy” hypothesis?
If it is shown that either Horus or Mithra or whoever is a carbon copy or a close copy, what is the effect it has on your faith? Would you renounce your faith if it is a carbon copy? And if you do not, would one turn around to use it as proof of one’s faith?

Or is this merely a study into religion and history and nothing to do with faith at all.

B) Implication of “carbon copy” hypothesis
In my opinion, a carbon copy hypothesis if it is true actually gives support to religion/god existence.

1) The existence of multiple distinct religions across the world that is strongly linked to location and time period is evidence either of
(i) The lack of a supernatural system or
(ii) The existence of a system in which some people are meant to fail (go to hell) right from the start. The simple reason being that there is a high chance one would pick the religion of one’s parents or if not then the society in which they live in.

2) The existence of a unified system of religion is greater evidence (but not conclusive) of there being a supernatural system.
(i) By unified, I do not refer to it being the same religion but rather a system that can generally encompass all the main aspects of all belief system.

3) Therefore, the existence of a carbon copy may offer some indirect “proof” of a god/supernatural system but it would not provide proof that any one religion or even way of life is the correct one. But of course acceptance of such a hypothesis would mean that there could be multiple routes to heaven. And in fact all the different religion is an attempt to shine a light on the path to heaven. And that atheism is in effect the route to heaven for they are the people who have ascended past the rites, ceremonies and prejudices to understand the true meaning of goodness and invoke their soul to guide their actions to do good without reward, rather than merely following blindly some rules in greedy anticipation of reward.

Consigliere United States Posted on 01/12/2005 at 04:51 PM

Consigliere pic

Pop Tarts:

Interesting question.  One I didn’t consider before posting the study.  As to my own faith, I could care less what others say.  So, what’s the purpose of this thread?  I’ll give you the background and then the answer.

Without getting into the psychology behind Christianity, many Christians show up at this site and think they can change your mind (your is used in the collective sense of the community here).  Bless their hearts, they are good people, but they are in way over their heads.  To your credit, there are some the fairly sharp tools in this shed.  You all also play for keepsies.  It’s a point of pride here that if you can’t run with the big dogs don’t get off the porch.

I ended up here because a couple of friends that lurk here informed me that they were reading arguments that they couldn’t refute regarding a conspiracy to manufacture Jesus.  So, I showed up to see what the fuss was about.  As it turns out there wasn’t much fuss after all.

I fell for the place, though.  I’m in stitches after I read Spocko, Les, El, GM, DS and zilch.  The humor is outstanding here if you like a Sam Kinison brand of irreverancy towards religion.  I’m twisted enough that I do. So I’ve started to hang out here.

A couple of weeks ago though, I don’t remember the guy’s name, but Les in a post to this guy took him to task, and in doing so mentioned that Horus=Jesus.  In Les’s special way, he implied the guy was a moron for not knowing that. 

To his credit, the guy read the Horus story and showed back up.  He had the audacity to say something to the effect of I’m not finding what you all are saying.  Suddenly, the swords came out and cut the guy to the quick.  He was treated as the village idiot and kicked around for amusement.  Shamefully, I stayed on the sidelines and let him get kicked around, because I hadn’t read the literature, was too busy to do so at the time.  I also didn’t want to hurt my own credibility by stepping into quicksand. 

Out of guilt, I spent many hours reading the materials I could find on the subject.  What I found was that the claim that Horus=Jesus is impossible to substiante, and that nearly all the comparisons that I find, including the ones here, are cut and paste materials from some very questionable sources. 

So I posted the entry, hoping that I could draw those folks into this discussion. Unfortunately, those that were the quickest to lash the kid, have avoided this thread now that the actors have changed.  I truly didn’t want to engage Nunya, but he was the only to step forward to defend the position.  I wanted to engage Les, but most especially, I wanted to engage DOF.  I generally respect what DOF has to say, and even read his blog.  I did want to expose the cut and paste claim for what it was. I wanted to reclaim some dignity for that kid, by kicking DOF around like he did that kid. 

So there you have it.  The purpose of this thread was not deep, and is in fact a very base one. I do believe that the thread has exposed the Horus=Jesus claims for the bullshit that they are, which is good.  To that extent its purpose has been served.  And maybe, just maybe, those with integrity won’t slam the naive who show up here with this bogus claim. 

Regards,

 Signature 

To die one’s self is a thing that must be easy, & light of consequence; but to lose a part of one’s self--well, we know how deep that pang goes, we who have suffered that disaster, received that wound which cannot heal.
Mark Twain- Letter to Will Bowen, 11/4/1888

GeekMom United States Posted on 01/12/2005 at 05:29 PM

GeekMom pic

I have to step in here and say that I appreciate Consi’s questioning the claim.  I always like to see someone doing the homework.  I don’t have a stake in it either way, but the Horus=Jesus claim is pretty interesting, and if people really want to thrash it out in a disciplined and scholarly fashion, I’d love to see what comes out of the crucible.

(I also have a friend who studies Egyptology as a hobby and can read hieroglyphs; I’ll have to ask him if he knows anything about it ...)

elwedriddsche United States Posted on 01/12/2005 at 09:28 PM

elwedriddsche pic

If only there were a steak in this…

I’ve never been religious myself and can’t quite figure out what people see in it (sort of like an acquired taste that’s not for me), but I suppose religion has answered the same questions over and over again and it’s therefore to be expected that it gives similar answers; it’s mildly interesting if these answers were arrived at independently or if some plagiarism was involved.

In this case, I’d like to see a side-by-side comparison, like a table with three columns - the source text and the two respective interpretations. That way, it’s a lot easier to follow the, um, commotion.

 Signature 

Science is answers that must always be questioned.
Philosophy is questions that may never be answered.
Religion is answers that must never be questioned.
Politics is answers that lobbyists pay for.

Spocko United States Posted on 01/12/2005 at 11:54 PM

Spocko pic

The Gods of Vulcan. Sebek & Sebek © SD4722.32

Foreword -

As near as today’s temporal logisticians can discern, the belief in the supernatural began tens of millennia in our past. The Logisticians of Surak find study of our primitive past helpful in the planning of contact with current day species that yet cling to the illogical concept of supernatural beings that rule over them (see LoS 432-2a7.9987-Bajor and LoS 349-77x.3118-Terra). We Once Had Gods on Vulcan documents the origins and evolution of the god(s) of Vulcan. I consider it a fascinating look into the history of belief and the power it can have over common populace.

Sarvek 4710.88, On the Plains of Fire.

Content:

1) The Beginnings of Belief
Reflections; the soul in the puddle
Shadows
Fear of Death
Out of the Body?
Darkness

2) The Priests
Hunters to Farmers
The Calendar
The Firmament
Astronomy
Astrology
Sky-Watchers
Racial Memory via Fable Transmission

3) The Many Faces of God(s)
Tribal Chieftans
The Necromancer
Medicine Men
Shaman
Sun Gods
Moon Gods
The Transients

4) The Age of Reason
Pre-Surakian Mythology
Enlightenment
Surak
Unification

At one time each village on Vulcan had their own god, each dying and then reborn each year! The tales of thier lives often very similar. The Logisticians speculate, quite logically, that the “priests” of the tribe realized that their most precious, indeed - life giving, knowledge was most likely to survive from generation to generation if it was intertwined within the ancient mythology of the dead chieftans of the past and the fables of the soul and afterlife. This most important information is, of course, the knowledge of the Cycle of the Sun or the Cycle of Life.

The greatest fear of any primitive, but sentient, being; the fear of death, produces a powerful glue to bind the neurons of belief to the psyche of the species. To imprint the story of the calendar onto the minds of the people the early astronomers/astrologers of many localities created stories about the travels of the sun through the different seasons of the year. The wise ones knew the people would only remember and pass along such information when told in allegory, therefore the winter sun and its welcoming wet days were glorified as the Good Sun and the fiery hot days of the summer herald the time of the Evil Sun. Basic agricultural information, critical to sustain the populace, was maintained in this fashion millennia before the advent of the written word. The birth and death of the Suns was celebrated each year in a synchronized dance with the routine of the seasons. Eventually only the Good Sun was worshipped. Before the enlightened days of Surak the original intent of the old stories was obscured or perverted, sometimes accidentally, sometimes with purposeful intent.

Tales of T’Khasi (page 27)

There were hundreds of these solar gods over the years, each one created anew or absorbed and renamed by the conquerors of the day. Each one the True God™ and the “graven images” of the older gods obliterated in an attempt to remove from memory the stories of the conquered. Still, the underlying information remains the same; when to plant, when to harvest, how to read the date by the position of the sun in the “zodiac”, the great wheel in the sky - the calendar.

The similarity of the deities of planets such as Terra only prove that disparate peoples had the same sky to look at and needed to record the same agricultural information. How any sentient being that seeks the truth and studies the past can continue to have “faith” in this solar mythology is beyond logic!

Peace and Long Life,
Spocko

Consigliere United States Posted on 01/13/2005 at 06:25 AM

Consigliere pic

I don’t even need it to be side by side.  I just need somebody to step up to the plate to substantiate the claims that Horus=Jesus with material from original documents.  I’ve yet to have any reference at all to translations of Egyptian texts that support any of the alleged similarities and have had to source the material myself.

Given that, I’m claiming victory by default on this issue.  Chalk one up for the theists.

Regards,

 Signature 

To die one’s self is a thing that must be easy, & light of consequence; but to lose a part of one’s self--well, we know how deep that pang goes, we who have suffered that disaster, received that wound which cannot heal.
Mark Twain- Letter to Will Bowen, 11/4/1888

Nunyabiz United States Posted on 01/13/2005 at 07:10 AM

Nunyabiz pic

ROTFL.

Now how about Jesus = Jesus, which BTW you do not one shred of verifiable evidence for.

LOL

Therefore I claim victory by default, chaulk one up for the Atheist.

I been busy past couple days and you “claim” victory BULLSHIT

Consigliere United States Posted on 01/13/2005 at 08:16 AM

Consigliere pic

Nunya:

We left off with my request for any reference to Horus being born in a cave.  You have not provided that.  In fact, you have failed to refer to any source documents for any of the alleged similarites. 

If you insist on continuing, pick any of the alleged similarites in my original post, that I did not concede (royal birth, murder plots, miracles were conceded).  Pick just one.  With that one that you pick, back up that allegation with specific reference to a source document that substantiates that specific claim. 

Also note, that for the purposes of this thread whether Jesus is real, whether the Bible is true, or whether Jesus is a copycat of any other sun god other than Horus are all immaterial. So let us not waste our time by bringing that into this thread.

Regards,

 Signature 

To die one’s self is a thing that must be easy, & light of consequence; but to lose a part of one’s self--well, we know how deep that pang goes, we who have suffered that disaster, received that wound which cannot heal.
Mark Twain- Letter to Will Bowen, 11/4/1888

Page 2 of 32 pages  <  1 2 3 4 >  Last »

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Smileys


Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:


<< Back to main