• Home
• Archives
• Tag Cloud
• SEBpedia
• Reviews
• About
• Members
• Login
• Register

Dixie Chicks reveal the naked truth.

Seems the Dixie Chicks are stirring up trouble again. This time with a saucy cover photo on today’s newly released Entertainment Weekly.

In the cover photo all three Chicks are wearing nothing but what they were born with and a random assortment of statements over the controversy they were at the center of printed on their bodies. Strategically placed hands and elbows keep the cover from being too revealing, but it’s still racy enough to ensure some headlines about stores refusing to carry that issue. No word on what the article itself will contain other than they’re standing up to their critics.

Permalink · 3 Comments · · · · · · · · · · · ·

Comments:

Page 1 of 1 pages

Da Goddess Posted on 04/24/2003 at 05:57 PM

Sigh. Everyone else let it go. They just had to bring it up again. Can you say “we aren’t making enough money?”

threehorses Posted on 04/27/2003 at 05:23 PM

It’s funny; just when I decide “OK, maybe I just was a little too sensitive about the infamous Natalie comment”, they salt the wound again.

It’s not that I felt she was wrong to say it. She believes it, or at least she did three comments ago - she keeps wavering so that frankly I don’t really know/care WHAT she believes anymore.  The problem is that she was so totally stupid to say it in Britain. 

Hello........ Tony Blair is Bush’s best bud here lately ... earth to Natalie.

Anyway, maybe one day she’ll stop reminding us that they exist and we can rediscover their music again.  Then the other two Chicks can stop looking like they really just want to hide.

Maybe.

t.j. stanmmeyer Posted on 04/28/2003 at 10:08 AM

hello this is me whats up

Page 1 of 1 pages

<< Back to main

ingolfson wrote: It looks like they are showing off the capabilities of a cell processor that can handle multiple streams of a single task more efficiently than a normal run of the…[go]

NihilXAOS wrote: I think this would be a big step in the right direction. Were it not for the hidden drivers and assumed criminality I would have purchased Bioshock 3, but I…[go]

Akusai wrote: That bill of rights really is amazing. I hope it’ll catch on, but I think that’s a vain hope. And, AngryArcheologist, I very much share your sentiments. I’ve…[go]

Bog Brother wrote: Although most people don’t see themselves as “wannabe plants”, everything else you said applies to them as well as to fungi. Err...Damn you and your tricksy logic!  OK, I…[go]

Webs wrote: AngryArcheologist: That’s a great avatar! If they want to give away free gas let em, but there are certainly better forms of charity out there. [go]

Webs wrote: It looks like they are showing off the capabilities of a cell processor that can handle multiple streams of a single task more efficiently than a normal run of the…[go]

tylerfitzgerald42 wrote: Going after the dealers instead of the junkies makes the job of law enforcement easier at the same time shrinking the size of the jails. The US should look at…[go]

bamboozlde wrote: the real psychological question here is: does the ‘pull my finger’ joke still work? why don’t scientists ever ask the important questions? [go]

Captain Falcon wrote: Captain Falcon says: LOL. Nice video. Very Funny. Sorry I have nothing else better to say. But you are awsome for sharing this to me. [go]

Last_Hussar wrote: CO2 output, overfishing, topsoil degradation, mercury emissions, overloaded trucks, unsafe products, Are all good for the economy. Cleanup cost money, ergo it shows up in the GDP.…[go]

CHALLENGERELIGION.COM

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.