Discrimination against atheists does happen.

Posted by Les on Sunday, May 06, 2007 at 12:28 AM. Read 2980 times. Tags: , ,
{name} pic

I brought up the fact that atheists are the least popular minority in America to someone the other day and they replied with something along the lines of, “Perhaps, but it’s not like you guys are the victims of discrimination.”

I told him that it doesn’t happen as often as it does for other minorities mainly because unless someone tells you that they are an atheist then you’re unlikely to know about it in the first place, but that there are still examples of discrimination to be found:

The official reason for Cantwell’s firing in November 2006 was “poor job performance,” but the commission’s investigator, Barbara Lelli, said Cantwell received no written warnings about performance problems.

Cantwell, who was provided housing he shared with a non-married partner, two of his children and three of her children, said he was criticized by DeCoster, a devout Christian, who didn’t approve of the living arrangement.

On another occasion, DeCoster brought up God in a conversation, and Cantwell responded by saying he was an atheist and didn’t believe in God.

Cantwell told the investigator that DeCoster put his hand on his shoulder and told him: “I can’t have someone like you here. We might need to part ways.”

What’s he afraid of? That some freethinking cooties will rub off on him? Be a real shame if he suddenly developed an ability for reasoned thought.

Comments:

Page 2 of 2 pages  <  1 2

Ragman United States Posted on 05/08/2007 at 12:31 PM

Ragman pic

It also just takes time for someone to work their way up the corporate ladder.  I remember a decade or two ago the complaining of how after all the advancements in equality women have made by that time, there were not “enough” women in high powered positions.  All I could think of was: what do you expect, that they should just promote a woman to the top without the requisite experience? 

dof: Maybe one reason women aren’t as ‘successful’ as men in the corporate setting is they’re not usually as bad as a man.

Yeah, I agree with you on that.  Of course, there still is sexism in business, not blatant for the most part, but still there.  Like racism, which still lingers, but is kept very low key. 

I think it’ll take kids that grow up where race and sex aren’t considered things that make you “less” of a person to move into upper level positions as a majority before things will truly even out.  Don’t get me wrong - it’s happening, but it does take time for the remnants of the “old guard” influence to go away.

Last_Hussar Great Britain (UK) Posted on 05/08/2007 at 05:25 PM

Last_Hussar pic

All I could think of was: what do you expect, that they should just promote a woman to the top without the requisite experience?

Similar happened in South Africa with top jobs for Africans. Just because racism has been abolished doesn’t give the blacks all the knowledge they need to take top jobs (in any field)- they have been denied the education. You end up with positive discrimination and people who get jobs because of DNA not skill. Giving averybody equality of education has to be first priority. Job Equality follows- it just may have to wait a generation.

 Signature 

I’d rather be liberal than illiberal.
I’d rather be progressive than conservative.

tmp Finland Posted on 05/08/2007 at 11:42 PM

tmp pic

Quotas can also cause an interesting effect, or at least a perception of effect.  If it’s easier to qualify for a position in a quota, then the quality of the people in the group is lower.  For example, if there is a _insert minority here_ quota in medical school, then _insert minority here_ doctors are, or at least seem to be, below average.

timmeh United States Posted on 05/17/2007 at 07:49 AM

timmeh pic

Quotas in and of themselves ARE racist. All it does is say yes we know X group is lesser so we have to make sure you hire X amount of them.

 Signature 

Confucius says, Learning without thought is labor lost; thought without learning is perilous.

Last_Hussar Great Britain (UK) Posted on 05/19/2007 at 05:21 AM

Last_Hussar pic

Reserved seats for BME (which is the ‘acceptable’ term now in the UK Left- I think it is Black and Minority Ethnic) was about the only contentious issue at my Union Conference. I have no problem with there being a Black Advisory Committee for the Union- BME do suffer racism and awareness of this needs to be handled someway.  A ruling council of any organisation, including governments, are likely to over-represent the majority, and so need advice from representives from minorities.  The argument is, is inherent racism/sexism/etc in the electorate so ingrained that it would be impossible for anyone who identifies as BME to get a seat on merit.

 Signature 

I’d rather be liberal than illiberal.
I’d rather be progressive than conservative.

Page 2 of 2 pages  <  1 2

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Smileys


Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:


<< Back to main