Brick Township, NJ, school board decides to shoot the messenger.

Posted by Les on Wednesday, March 02, 2005 at 04:11 PM. Read 9130 times. Tags: ,
{name} pic

A teacher by the name of Stuart Mantel in the Brick Township School District in New Jersey went ballistic back in February when one of his students refused to stand for the National Anthem. When screaming at the student didn’t bring compliance Mantel grabbed his chair and literally yanked it out from underneath him. What Mantel didn’t realize was that another student was recording the whole altercation on his camera phone and later released the video on the web.

The class started out that morning with Mantel yelling “I don’t want to hear a sound! Not a sound! Morning exercises will come on, you will stand, you will stand quietly, you will pay attention! Any Questions!? ... Now stand up and keep your mouths shut!“ Students stood up as the national anthem began playing.

In the middle of the anthem, Mantel walked over to Jay and demanded that he stand up. Jay silently refused, and Mantel yelled again, “Stand up!“ Jay then said “I don’t have to stand up.“ To which Mantel insisted “You have to stand.“ Jay said, “No I don’t.“ Mantel then reached over and pulled Jay’s chair out from under him. Jay responded to Stuart Mantel’s outrageous behavior by asking Mantel “Are you serious?“, to which Mantel yelled “I am damn well serious.“

According to some of the students, Mantel is known for having anger management issues and has gotten very upset over any disrespect students show for the National Anthem or the Pledge of Allegiance many times in the past. The student who recorded the video clip had brought the camera specifically to catch Mantel if he blew up again. Given what’s seen on the tape you might assume that the school district disciplined the teacher or at least informed him of the fact that there have been many court rulings establishing a student’s right to sit quietly rather than be compelled to stand during the pledge or the anthem, but you’d be mistaken.

According to the account given on the IndyMedia site where the video was posted, the teachers and principal wanted Mantel to press charges against Jay and another student by the name of Corey on the grounds that they had violated Mantel’s Constitutional rights by taping him without permission arguing that the students had set Mantel up. A third student, Steve, who did the recording was suspended for 10 days for his part in this misadventure. The students claim Mantel wasn’t disciplined at all.

Yesterday Schools Superintendent Thomas L. Seidenberger issued a statement to the Asbury Park Press that says “not all details cited on the Internet regarding this incident are factual” without going into any further details.

District spokeswoman Jennifer Strano declined to say whether anyone had been disciplined, but said “appropriate administrative action” had been taken. School officials also would not identify “Jay” or the student using the camera phone.

So what did they say they were planning to do?

“We as a Board of Education realize that we are ushering a new era and will be forced to review our policies and perhaps enforce a more stringent districtwide policy regarding electronic recording devices in the classroom,“ Seidenberger added.

Strano said each school in the district has a policy prohibiting the use of wireless phones in school during school hours.

In the statement, Seidenberger said he may ask the school board to adopt a stricter policy. He also said he may ask the board to consider developing a policy regarding unauthorized taping.

That’s right, they’re going to try and make sure nothing that embarrasses the district like this will ever happen again. We can’t have students standing up for their rights, after all, that would be bad.

Granted, the video clip that’s been released doesn’t give one a whole lot to make judgments about what sort of people the students or the teacher happen to be. It’s entirely possible that these kids have been a thorn in the side of this teacher for awhile and it’s also possible that the teacher is a major asshole who needs to take a chill pill or three. It does seem that Mr. Mantel has a problem with getting the respect he feels he should from his students and has resigned himself to trying to force that respect from his class. I had a couple of teachers like that when I was going through school and, in my experience at least, that approach never worked. If anything it resulted in open disrespect from kids who normally wouldn’t go out of their way to be disrespectful.

Regardless, Mantel’s forcing the student to stand

was

a violation of the student’s right to quietly sit for whatever reasons he had for doing so. This is exactly the sort of problem I and others have said would come from all these laws being passed by knee-jerk patriots who think that mandating schools to start the day with the National Anthem and the Pledge of Allegiance is going to somehow magically instill respect for this country or its government in the kids being forced to participate.

Comments:

Page 1 of 3 pages  1 2 3 >

Spocko United States Posted on 03/02/2005 at 05:32 PM

Spocko pic

I am going to puke!  sick

BTW Sieg Heil!

Sepharo United States Posted on 03/02/2005 at 05:37 PM

Sepharo pic

This is not surprising at all. Only being out of it for one year I can say this is exactly how public school is. I have seen teachers grab desks while students are sitting in them and slide them across the room in anger. For some teachers yelling and screaming is a daily thing. Teachers k-12 are power hungry psychos. My favorite was being told that I “have to do” something. I don’t “have to” do anything. A teacher would give me an assignment and tell me if I didn’t do it they would give me a detention, isn’t the grade ‘E’ I would receive punishment enough? I fought that one with a meeting between me, a counseler and the teacher which I won surprisingly.

decrepitoldfool United States Posted on 03/02/2005 at 08:02 PM

decrepitoldfool pic

Typical.  The authorities videotape us all the time (consent be damned) in places both public and private.  But let one of us videotape them misbehaving and suddenly they’re all on about “privacy” and “rights” and such.

At my high school we had a PE teacher who used to do stuff like that.  In 1974 he pushed me against some lockers because I walked through the cafeteria with a hat on (“Hey!  See that red, white, and blue thing over there!?“)  He was never disciplined to my knowledge even though many complaints were made.

It just occurred to me that he might have heard that I wasn’t standing during the pledge. Certainly justification for assaulting a kid half your size.

Talking Soup United States Posted on 03/02/2005 at 10:27 PM

Talking Soup pic

I for one can’t recall a single incident at my high school in which a students rights were truly respected. High school basically operates in the same way as a dictatorship, so it’s not surprising. When we did a “1984” project for my Social Justice class one student compared our school to the 1984 society, with the students as the proles. Frankly, I couldn’t agree more.

shana Japan Posted on 03/03/2005 at 03:56 AM

shana pic

Above and beyond any issues involved, yanking a chair out from under a child is against the law.  How can they ignore this?

I guess I was just lucky in going to the schools I went to…

 Signature 

“Like reindeer in the sky you can.“

Mick Australia Posted on 03/03/2005 at 05:26 AM

Mick pic

As Shana said, the school more seems worried about the students “invasion” of the teachers “privacy” (in a public place no less!) than by the fact that they have a teacher on their faculty who seems to routinely assault (that is the word I’d use) his students.

Not that I’m surprised. While at the high school I went to I never saw or heard of a student being attacked by a teacher, I know for a fact that the entire faculty turned a blind eye to the methods used by the dorm prefects in disciplining the younger students, and in some cases actively encouraged them. This caused a bit of a media storm when a student in the year above me sent a letter to the local paper, excerpts of which made it into the national press. I remember our year being warned not to say anything by any press who got onto the school grounds or who we met while on day leave in the nearby town.

Everything blew over, the shit continued. Had someone been able to do what these kid did and have it recorded however, many heads would doubtless have rolled.

Dean Australia Posted on 03/03/2005 at 06:51 AM

Dean pic

There was this one teacher at my high school that yelled at the students constantly with just cause. My teacher never physically assaulted us or trampled on any rules, he was simply controlling jerks who didn’t want to be there.

This guy however, well, it’s hard to believe who is telling the truth. I wouldn’t trust the video as much as I trust the statements made by the school body.

Eric Paulsen United States Posted on 03/03/2005 at 07:56 AM

Eric Paulsen pic

I wouldn’t trust the video as much as I trust the statements made by the school body.

Wait, are you saying that you won’t believe your own eyes and choose to rely on the veracity of a school board circling the wagons against a major lawsuit to get at the truth? Are you prone to visual hallucinations? What you see in the video is an assault, pure and simple, and you cannot dismiss it because it happened to a minor at school instead of an adult at work. Would you make excuses for your boss if he knocked you to the floor for failing to genuflect whenever he mentioned the pope in your presence?

Anyhow, this comes as no surprise to anyone who remembers that Rumsfeld’s biggest concern when the Abu Ghraib scandal broke was that cell phones with cameras needed to be banned from secure facilities. Better that 1000 prisoners be raped, tortured, and murdered by the government than 1 embarrassing scandal come to light, heaven forfend. What can you expect when Republicans control the government if NOT a defend the guilty attitude?

THEOCRAT United States Posted on 03/03/2005 at 04:41 PM

THEOCRAT pic

Is the video going to be permissable as evidence against the teacher?

gnus53 United States Posted on 03/04/2005 at 03:58 AM

gnus53 pic

Lots of problems with the video.

One. It was staged and deliberately done, by the students….and a violation of the law.

They should lose the phone completely. Never get it back.

TWO, the student reportedly having his chair pulled out from under him? I doubt it. From the angle of the video view, it appears he was sitting atop the desk/stool….and from his body movement, there was no safety problem.

THREE, it wasn’t specified, but I wonder if the purportedly agrieved student wasn’t the one doing the whistling.

FOUR, As for his use of profanity, the school should have the student suspended for a week — for each profanity…That would come to at least three weeks. Also, have him lose all credits toward graduation during that period.
It seemed the teen was acting more like a spoiled petulant infant, rather than someone who narrowly escaped physical injury.

RE: Claiming the teacher should have been calling for assistance, there is a lot of information we don’t have — such as if they security responds quickly at the school; if the student (and his buds) have a continual history of disrupting the class and have not been punished by the administration…. and so many more questions.

ALSO….yes, ban all cell phones except for those belonging to the teachers…… Perhaps have a claim check system with a safe for the students to check them in when they come on campus. Perhaps have it where students lose all credits gained toward graduation that semester if they are caught on campus with cell phones.
Have it where they could earn back the credits by attending night school and night school only.

ONE BIG suggestion, let the teachers control their own video cameras and record the classes…. Just think of the parent claiming ? My Jonnie/Janey would never do that?….and have the teacher able to show their perfect kid….doing everything from cheating to stealing …. to everything else … during a parent-teacher conference.

The best way to do it would be that if it was only allowable for the teacher to run or view. If there was any complaints, then that particular class could be viewed by the other teachers in their section.

BTW, all of the students involved in this little stunt should probably be banned from the school entirely…..they were not virgins when it came to class disruption….and the school/class would be better off without them. Let them go to a private or county remedial school — one that confiscates all cell phones.

That might leave the students in the class who actually would like to learn…

Does the teacher have some problems….? Yes…. but the best way to handle this is to remove those fools…even from the school if they are habitual miscreants.

Perhaps if they had to pay to get a diploma, they might actually pay attention in class enough to graduate with better than 3rd grade level skills…

In many ways, the video shows that many of the schools have the inmates running the asylums….
and students showing little if any “family values” like respect.

shana Japan Posted on 03/04/2005 at 06:00 AM

shana pic

Right, so the teacher could turn it off when he wanted to yell?  Screw that.
And what’s with the anti-cell phone big brother bit?
Are you sure you aren’t that teacher?

 Signature 

“Like reindeer in the sky you can.“

bunny United States Posted on 03/04/2005 at 07:23 AM

bunny pic

give me a break if you think there isn’t more to this story than a group of web pages written by the same teenagers in question.  the video i say on the news shows the student knocking over his own chair when he stood up.  who said they were sitting quietly, when refusing to stand.  you only saw what a group of out of control teens wanted you to see.  when did it become wrong to treat a teacher with respect.  my kids have been taught to respect their teachers, if there is a problem to go to the principal or talk to us.  there has to be more to this story, but most people don’t want the truth.

Les United States Posted on 03/04/2005 at 07:50 AM

Les pic

What I find ironic about gnus53’s comment is that he/she repeatedly claims the video doesn’t give much to judge the teacher by yet he/she is perfectly willing to assume the kids are the assholes and is ready to specify all manner of draconian rules to try and force the respect said teacher is unable to earn on his own. Please specify which law the kids have violated? I’m not aware of any laws prohibiting secretly taping a teacher losing control in front of his class.

Bunyy, where I come from you have to earn your respect. It’s not given to you just because you’re in a position of authority. There were a lot of teachers I respected and admired growing up, but there were also several that demonstrated every reason for me to have absolutely no respect for them. The same is still true today. There are a number of people who have earned my respect and admiration, but easily as many who have demonstrated they’re not worthy of much more than contempt.

 Signature 

Agnostics are just atheists without balls. - Stephen Colbert

decrepitoldfool United States Posted on 03/04/2005 at 08:01 AM

decrepitoldfool pic

It is actually quite likely that some of the students are jerks, spawned from years of being spoon-fed their “self-esteem” whether they accomplished anything or not.  Then if the teacher is a jerk, you get a situation guaranteed to explode.

Videotaping classes to show parents their kids’ misbehavior is an entertaining idea, but I doubt most parents would change their behavior even if confronted with evidence.  Still, it’s worth a try.  If I were a teacher, I might say; “Since we’re videotaping you, feel free to videotape me.“ (At least they’d be paying attention… heh!)  A room with 35 people in it can hardly be called a private situation.

Cell phones in schools have many positives - family connections (people are busy and they have to manage complex days) safety (Columbine) and some reduction in the feeling of isolation that kids have in a needlessly authoritarian situation. (Kids are treated like prisoners, learning “citizenship” only as an abstraction like the disembodied math problems that prepare them for NCLB tests.)  And finally, keeping the authorities accountable with pictures and video. 

There’s hardly anything more ludicrous than demanding respect while acting disrespectfully.  The authorities shout “foul” when kids do it, but hide behind rules when they themselves do it.

Ted United States Posted on 03/04/2005 at 12:04 PM

Ted pic

One thig to keep in mind, and I still think that the teacher was out of line, is that the previous day they had a substitute teacher and they had made the sub’s life hell by shrinkwrapping a fellow student to his chair.

FWIW

 Signature 

Ted’s Blog, nowhere as cool as this site though…

Pop Tarts United States Posted on 03/04/2005 at 01:05 PM

Pop Tarts pic

Students’ provocation and supposed staging of the event, using of video phone and privacy of teacher are all IRRELEVANT as the question is focused on the actions of the teachers.

Examine the issue from the back. Does a teacher in any circumstance have the right to attack the student? The answer would be in the negative. Student’s action at best could only be used as mitigating factors with regards to the punishment given to the students.

Students actions are only relevant if one is answering the separate question relating to the discipline of the students. If one wants to expel the students for making it difficult for the substitute or shrinkwrapping a fellow student, by all means no one is stopping them. But that has no relevance to the actions of the teacher.

Separate the issues so as not to confuse the distinct incidents involved. Even a police officer who had arrested a murderer have no right to batter that person.

joe United States Posted on 03/04/2005 at 03:49 PM

joe pic

In my senior year in high school I took a psychology class and had a really great teacher, Mrs. Juchau.  Funny, smart, hip—in her late 50s, I’d guess.  One day she called in sick and we got a substitute.  I don’t know what this woman’s problem was, but she was on a hair trigger.  And no, we were not horrible or mean to her.  We respected Mrs. Juchau too much to make trouble for this substitute.  Anyway, this woman yelled and screamed at us the entire hour.  We didn’t even know what we were doing that was setting her off—we tried to ask her, but she just saw that as insubordination.  She said she was going to write a report to Mrs. Juchau about how awful we all were.

The next day Mrs. Juchau came back.  She walked in, gave us her usual cheery hello.  We just sat in silence, not knowing what was going to happen.  She saw a notebook on her desk.  “What’s this?“  She picked it up and read the first page.  The expression on her face would’ve been comical if we hadn’t been so scared.  She then chucked the thing into the trash, turned to us, and said, “Now, where did we leave off?“

So here’s to Mrs. Juchau!

—Joe grin

decrepitoldfool United States Posted on 03/04/2005 at 06:56 PM

decrepitoldfool pic

- Joe’s post about Mrs. Jachau -

Wonderful!  Beautiful.  How can we get more teachers like her?

TheBo$$ United States Posted on 03/04/2005 at 07:17 PM

TheBo$$ pic

It should be obvious that a town with a name like Brick Township that its not exactly going to be the smartest town in the nation. Darn that Middle (but not literally Middle) American again…

Brent Anderson United States Posted on 03/05/2005 at 09:42 AM

Brent Anderson pic

I’m going with Les on this one and any of you who don’t think the teacher acts like this all the time are idiots.

elwedriddsche United States Posted on 03/05/2005 at 09:28 PM

elwedriddsche pic

I’m with Les, too.

I have little experience with American schools; all I know is that those that went to both European and American schools felt cheated out of an education in the US. Having said that, there are asshole teachers everywhere. Let’s face it, there are in-duh-vi-duh-als in that profession that are quite unqualified.

In the German Gymnasium (a different kind of bench pressing than in a gymn) I went to, the teachers had to earn our respect. Some we feared, but we found ways to get even. I’m afraid we were vindictive bastards…

I haven’t viewed the video, but if the teacher lost his cool, then he must be disciplined. Whatever other issues the school has with the students are a seperate issue. It’s really a simple matter and if it isn’t, the school has a major problem.

 Signature 

Science is answers that must always be questioned.
Philosophy is questions that may never be answered.
Religion is answers that must never be questioned.
Politics is answers that lobbyists pay for.

ellie United States Posted on 03/06/2005 at 01:34 AM

ellie pic

ed. code is enforced different in CA (or at least in my district).  EVERYONE (students & teachers) are required to stand, (though not to recite) the pledge.  It doesn’t say anything about the kid refusing to stand as a political statement of belief.  That’s how I can tell a kid is going to have a bad day.  He doesn’t feel like doing anything, even standing up.

When a situation gets that bad, it’s usually an indication that both teacher & students are about as fucked up as they come.  Video clips may be true, but they never have context.

In my classroom, it’s a joke if the kids yell at me “Stop yelling!“ becuase I never do.  They also laugh at me when they get out of hand or refuse to work & I respond “I’m becoming frustrated & feel like I’m being rudely ignored.  I know I’m an authority figure, but I’m also a human being, & I’m trying to help you.“  Videotape of my Friday morning would never make the local news.  A student a foot taller than me told me to “shut up” & “fuck you” in my face because I said “I’ll have to separate you 2” (a girl he was discussing a break-up with).  Or the 200 times a day I’m interrupted mid-sentence with “This is boring/dumb”

I tell my students that it seems rebellion & freedom have become popular benevolent ends in & of themselves, with no other purpose, & that’s a pathetic waste of energy.  We rebel against bad authority & fight for freedom so we can do something valuable!

As for you complaining about teachers, I had my share of half-witted basket cases.  But for once, consider, 35 people in a room for an hour, 6 different times with barely a 20 minute lunch before you have to answer to your boss & a few parents asking why you didn’t notice some slight slacking or unhappiness in one of the 210 kids you saw all day.  Of course it’d be great if we could have one class size of 15 & each teacher had only 2-3 classes, but that’s not the way it is.  I’ve reprimanded or asked what a student was doing when s/he was doing nothing truly troublesome. But for each of those, I don’t notice a kid wandering out of his/her seat to poke someone else, distract others, &/or God knows what else.

If you’re a brilliant person who doesn’t need a teacher, good for you.  But please understand what it must be like to be responsible for not only 210 immature people, but for making sure they learn something valuable, & doing it in the calmest way possible 6 hours a day, 5 days a week, 180 days a year.

ellie United States Posted on 03/06/2005 at 01:53 AM

ellie pic

Well, they put videos in school busses, the bus drivers don’t necessarily have control.  It might help both students & teachers think about the context they build everyday. I love this blog for anything school-related in national news.  You can also check out this.

decrepitoldfool United States Posted on 03/06/2005 at 09:30 AM

decrepitoldfool pic

Interesting question in that second link:

When is the last time that anyone saw teacher stress or burnout addressed in the Mainstream Media?

Answer: 13 Feb. 05 Time magazine cover story, Parents behaving badly  It was all about how kids feel like they rule the place and parents do exactly zero to back up the teachers, high teacher turnover, etc.  I also see articles about it quite frequently in the Chicago Trubune.

No wonder we don’t get brilliant teachers.

On a related matter, I can only wonder about the minds that can believe forcing people to recite a pledge everyday will increase patriotism.  Kids are allowed none of the freedoms they are promised as Americans.  It’s all pie-in-the-sky to them.

Would allowing such freedoms make schools impossible to manage?  Maybe, unless some other priorities are put in order.  Every class needs at least one teacher’s aid, for example. No one should have to control 35 adversaries.

Too much money?  Have to look at

school sports

other programs to cut so we can concentrate on the core mission of education.

Talking Soup United States Posted on 03/06/2005 at 08:59 PM

Talking Soup pic

I may be wrong, but I was under the impression that students didn’t have to stand for the pledge. I know there are several groups in the country who won’t say the pledge—Jehovah’s Witnesses, for one.

Page 1 of 3 pages  1 2 3 >

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Smileys


Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:


<< Back to main