Are intelligent design and creation science laughable?

Posted by VernR on Friday, July 23, 2004 at 09:03 AM. Read 1641 times. Tags: , ,
{name} pic

Unlike Les, I seldom found much humor the the few times that I visited Creation Science web sites. However, I recently found this one, which really is good for some laughs. The pages on the Creation Science Fair, and on applying Game Theory to Christian Apologetics and are a couple of gems.

Tongue out of cheek. The July/August issue of the Skeptical Inquirer contains Matt Young’s review of the new book, Unintelligent Design, by Mark Perakh. The book provides a critical analysis of the works of of Dembreski (The Design Inference, Intelligent Design, and No Free Lunch), Johnson (Darwin on Trial and The Wedge of Truth), and Behe (Darwin’s BlackBox) as well as a number of less well known creationists. It also discusses the practice of science. Although the review is favorable, Young indicates some problems with the organization of the book, its occasional tendency toward repetition, and a couple of areas where he believes that Perakh is off the mark technicaly.

Even though much of the information in the book is available at Perakh’s web site. I ordered the book. It may just be an age thing, but, if there is a lot of reading involved, I much prefer a book or hard copy to the computer screen.

Young also mentions a couple of other books that debunk ID propositions—Ceationism’s Trojan Horse by Barbara Forrest and Paul Gross, God, the Devil and Darwin by Niall Shanks and an anthology Why Intelligent Design Fails: A Scientific Critique of the New Creationism coedited by Young and Tanner Edis. As far as I can tell none of these have been cited in posts.

Comments:

Page 2 of 2 pages  <  1 2

zilch Austria Posted on 10/11/2006 at 02:52 AM

zilch pic

Yo guys, why so much hostility to the christians? Don’t the turban-donning, AK-47 wielding, jihad fanatics deserve more of your attention.

AntiCrank, if you check out the archives here, for instance in this thread, you’ll find that the jihad fanatics get their share of attention too.  Speaking for myself, I probably tend to lambaste the fundie Christians more, because they have less excuse (in my eyes) for being ignorant: they live in societies with more or less free access to information, secular schools, and freedom of religion.  Not only that, but there’s very little I can do here to reach Muslims, but fundamentalist Christians show up regularly at SEB, so their beliefs are fair game.

 Signature 

You were born.  And so you’re free.  So happy birthday.
- Laurie Anderson

Les United States Posted on 10/11/2006 at 09:39 AM

Les pic

What Zilch said and, the events of 9/11 aside, the actions of Fundamentalist Christians more often and more directly impact my life than the actions of most Muslims. Thus they get the larger brunt of my attention.

There’s plenty of Christians out there I don’t have a problem with and many that I actively endorse (such as ***Dave) as good examples of what a Christian should be like given my take on the religion. That said, there’s still plenty of not-so-good Christians to rant about.

 Signature 

All I know is the wine lasts longer when you don’t gotta share it with someone
All I know is my steak tastes better when I take my steak tastes better pill
-- I Feel Fantastic, Jonathan Coulton

Page 2 of 2 pages  <  1 2

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Smileys


Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:


<< Back to main