A call for calm after the election storm.

Posted by Les on Thursday, November 04, 2004 at 03:28 PM. Read 4765 times. Tags:
{name} pic

I’d like to ask everyone who’s upset over Bush winning re-election to pause for a moment, take a deep breath, and just try to relax. For the past 24 hours or so far too many Liberals have been running around as though hot nuclear death were raining down from the sky and they only had minutes remaining to be someplace else very far away. More than a few people have emphatically stated their intentions to move to another country and I’m sure more than a few of you are deadly serious about it. Quite a few others are wasting energy on being angry, depressed, worried, bitter, melancholy, or what have you and often times more than one of those emotions at once. In short, a lot of us are being not just reactionary, but over-reactionary to this development. Yes, I think a lot of us are overreacting and not thinking this through with a clear head like we should be.

For starters, nothing has really changed yet. America didn’t suddenly become a theocracy when Kerry called Bush and conceded. None of Bush’s goals in his agenda suddenly became a foregone conclusion with his reelection. The Bill of Rights wasn’t set alight and outlawed the moment Bush gave his victory speech. But you might think all of those things had happened if you were to judge us simply by how we’ve reacted. The truth is America still has a long way to go before our worst fears become reality and the worst thing we could do that would help ensure those fears come to pass is to throw our hands up in frustration or flee like scared rabbits.

Let’s address the option some folks are considering of moving out of the country. Canada seems to be a popular choice for a lot of folks who are seriously considering leaving mainly due to its more left-leaning government and populace. Canada is certainly willing to take you on, but you’ll have to get in line with everyone else who’s trying to move there from other countries. Word has it that legal immigration to Canada can take upwards of a year and then it’s another three years before you can become a full citizen. You could move in ahead of schedule if you manage to land a job there first and that’ll require a work permit, which is still a good four to six months in the future if you apply today. As long as you’re waiting you may as well ask yourself a few questions starting with, ‘Do I really think this means I’m leaving the problems in America behind?’ Consider that for a moment: For better or worse, America is the most powerful nation on the planet. If we were all to give up and abandon ship leaving the country to the right-wingers to do with as they please, how long do you think it would be before you once again started to feel the impact of that decision? If the Dominionists succeed in their goal of reshaping America into a true “Christian Nation” as they envision it, do you really think they’re going to be happy with that and leave the rest of the world alone? We’ve already read about how their goal is, quite literally, world domination. Imagine an America reshaped and run by these people. Do you honestly think you’d be safe anywhere on the planet with them in control back here?

For those of you who are busy panicking over this development you should be asking yourself, ‘How does this help the situation?’ The short answer is: It doesn’t. At best it’s a waste of energy and at worst it confirms everything the opposition believes is true about us. It also tends to feed on itself as it’s difficult to think clearly when you’re busy overreacting and we end up falling back on some of the very tendencies we take Conservatives to task for such as black and white thinking. Caught up in our own emotions we resort to knee-jerk reactions and lose sight of some very important facts.

For example, take a look at this USA Today map that breaks down how each county in each state voted into either Red of Blue. If you’re a Liberal then you probably find the sight of that map a bit depressing, but does it really say anything other than a particular county was won by one side or the other? No, it’s a simple binary depiction that gives you no indication how close the race in any particular county might have been and if you do some searching you’ll probably find that the race in many areas was very close.

Consider Oakland County, Michigan where Kerry got 319,607 votes and Bush got 316,567 making for a 50% to 49% win for Kerry with a mere 3040 votes difference. Now contrast that with Alpena County, Michigan where Bush scored 7,665 votes to Kerry’s 7,406 making for another 50% to 49% win for the other side with only 259 votes separating them. More importantly take a look at Michigan as a whole in that CNN county-by-county breakdown that colors the counties based on how strongly they allied with one side or the other. By my count there were at least 16 counties that were so close as to not show a hint of either red or blue and there were only a handful of counties that could be considered to be strongly on one side or the other. Looking at the other states you’ll find a couple that were mostly blue-tinted such as Massachusetts and a couple that were mostly red-tinted such as Oklahoma, but in a lot of them you’ll find that there’s an awful lot of white counties where it could easily have gone either way and even more counties where support one way or the other was just barely enough to give the state any tint at all.  If we were to apply this graduated concept to a map of how the states voted you might end up with a map like this one over at BoingBoing.net which has an awful lot of purple on it.

That’s the effect of those moderates we keep forgetting about that make up a good portion of the population. People like ***Dave who tend to lean liberal, but still has some consevative aspects to his nature as well. I think ***Dave is a good representative of the moderate viewpoint in part because of his entries dealing with his struggle to decide which candidate he was going to vote for. I take comfort in the fact that when I look at those maps that provide a graduated scale showing how strong one county or another happened to be for either side that the majority of them could be open to persuasion and a well reasoned argument to go the other way next time.

It’s important in times like this that we are level-headed enough to look for what the reality is as opposed to what we fear it might be. Just as the majority of Christians aren’t far-right Fundamentalist assholes, not everyone who voted for Bush is a die-hard Conservative who is beyond all reasoning with. It’s easy to forget this because we generally tend to get into arguments with the folks who ARE those things as opposed to the moderates. It’s also important to remember that we argue with them not because we foolishly think we’ll change their minds, but because we’re hoping our reasoning will resonate with the folks who are open to considering other viewpoints. If we just throw up our hands in frustration and feel sorry for ourselves, though, then we will end up with a self-fulfilling prophecy. We can sit around and pout and point fingers at what age groups we had pinned our hopes on that didn’t show up or how 51% of the nation must be clueless morons or any of a dozen other excuses we can dream up. Or we can take a deep breath, take a critically honest look at ourselves, our message, and our situation and then move forward determined not to let this setback crush our spirits. The only constant is change and even the darkest days eventually give way to better times.

Comments:

Page 1 of 4 pages  1 2 3 >  Last »

GeekMom United States Posted on 11/04/2004 at 04:51 PM

GeekMom pic

Les,

You completely, totally, utterly utterly stonking ROCK.

Thank you.

ingolfson Europe Posted on 11/04/2004 at 04:53 PM

ingolfson pic

I do suspect there’s a certain dark pleasure in predicting doom, even if done so in-cheek.

Even before the election I was telling my friends that we could have fun either way: we could celebrate a Kerry win, or make up scary possibilities after a Bush majority.

So count me as guilty in stoking those fires a little. Its not fear speaking, though I DO have a few miles of Atlantic between the Shrub and me.

***Dave United States Posted on 11/04/2004 at 05:00 PM

***Dave pic

Sing it, Brother Les!  And not just because you said nice things about me. grin

To put it a slightly different way, by wailing and making with the sackcloth and ashes, those on the Left (to generalize folks into camps) tell the folks in the Center that, jeez, the Left must be really way out there on the fringe if they are treating this as Armageddon ...

In fact, the motivations that went into this election are widely varied, and most of the folks *I* know who decided for Kerry or for Bush were pretty conflicted over it—preferring one candidate over another in a variety of areas. I know a lot of folks (and I nearly was one) who cannot abide Bush’s social policies, and have grave doubts over his budgetary/economic policies, but had more serious doubts about Kerry on the most important issue to them, the War on Terror.  To say, “You’re a gap-toothed idiot!” or “You just destroyed this country!” not only is, well, unnuanced (ahem), but makes an enemy (in your mind *and* theirs) out of a potential ally—someone who, when the issues are different *next* election, might very well choose the other direction.

The problem with the Blue State/Red State frame is that it’s part and parcel of the “You’re either For us or Against us”—a stupid, simplistic tactic that’s equally reprehensible from whichever side it comes (and which plays into the hands of partisan politicians who want you to ignore names and records and just vote according to the little “R” or “D").  I really like that BoingBoing Map of Purples, because it shows not just the differences, but the commonalities, a lot better than the ordinary electoral maps.

nowiser United States Posted on 11/04/2004 at 05:18 PM

nowiser pic

Does this mean the revolution is going to be postponed?  cool mad

I guess I’ll nuke that TV dinner after all.

oh oh

 Signature 

It vexes me when they would constrain science by the authority of the Scriptures, and yet do not consider themselves bound to answer reason and experiment—Galileo

Solonor United States Posted on 11/04/2004 at 05:33 PM

Solonor pic

That’s just the kind of ignorant crap I’d expect from you, you slack-jawed yokel. Sure, couch it in your fancy schmancy “logic” and “calm rationality”...but we can see right through you, you tool of the opressor!

***Dave United States Posted on 11/04/2004 at 05:37 PM

***Dave pic

Hey, I gotta do something to earn those secret payments from the Gnomes of Zurich ...

decrepitoldfool United States Posted on 11/04/2004 at 05:38 PM

decrepitoldfool pic

I have been thinking for months about how it happens that intelligent people can differ so widely in their conclusions from the same facts or events (on those occasions where facts are agreed upon.) The Bush/Kerry thing is a good example.

I have come to the conclusion that it happens because of the frame we put around the picture right at the beginning.  How do Bush supporters hear his verbal gaffes and it does not diminish their opinion of him?  Because early on they decided he was an honorable man and every picture element put into that frame proves their decision.  They might have selected that frame because of agreement on Jesus, or abortion, or because he seems like their next-door neighbor.  The important thing is, they felt a connection.

The frame produces the adjectives that drive assessment.  When his administration can’t work with others, he’s “determined” and “strong.” When someone protests, they’re trying to change the frame and we really don’t like having our frames changed.

Or consider Kerry - a decorated veteran; no Eisenhower, sure, but he stood up in the line of fire, saw conscripts die, and decided to come home and oppose the war.  Depending if you put a frame of honor or dishonor around that picture, you then perceive every action the man ever takes after that in an entirely different way.

Is there a way to be sure of escaping our frames of reference and making a remotely objective assessment of an issue?  Most people practice the dominent religion of their countries and follow their families’ political beliefs for generations (my 94-year-old grandmother thinks GWB is “a dim bulb” and will eviscerate any argument to the contrary.)

No, America did not become a theocracy yesterday but I firmly believe it took a big step in that direction.  I really do think Bush is a dangerous idiot but seeing as he seems to be holding all the cards right now, I’d like to be wrong.  The problem is I am simply unable to see the same Bush his supporters see. 

As for moving to Canada, I certainly would not but I can’t speak for my three draft-age sons.  They may feel differently.

And, what GM said.

deadscot United States Posted on 11/04/2004 at 06:05 PM

deadscot pic

I really do think Bush is a dangerous idiot but seeing as he seems to be holding all the cards right now, I’d like to be wrong.  The problem is I am simply unable to see the same Bush his supporters see.

This is exactly what I’m struggling with at the moment.  It seems that most of us here are capable of taking on just about any topic and debating it from any number of perspectives.

For some reason I just can’t seem to get a Bush presidency to add up to anything good in my mind.  I don’t see Kerry supporters running en masse over a cliff.  I think this is a temporary shock and work will begin anew in coming months.  I agree with DOF’s assessment that the country took one huge step toward a theocracy and would encourage those who didn’t follow Les’ earlier link to the ACLU to become members and get involved.

IMHO this is still the greatest nation and it’s not because of our government, but in spite of it.

Oh, and what Geekmom said, dammit!

Ragman United States Posted on 11/04/2004 at 06:09 PM

Ragman pic

[sarcasm]I’m sure ChristianExodus will be disappointed now that they won’t be martyred for the cause.[/sarcasm]

If the admin goes for some kind of forced military service, they’ll try to figure something that won’t formally be the draft, so they can say there’s no draft.  Probably start requiring military service in exchange for student aid, since you already have to be registered with Selective Service (the draft) to get financial aid.  Then Ashcroft can start hunting down those who didn’t register with Sel. Service while checking their computers for illegal mp3s and movies.

VernR United States Posted on 11/04/2004 at 06:40 PM

VernR pic

Then Ashcroft can start hunting down those who didn’t register with Sel. Service while checking their computers for illegal mp3s and movies.

From what I have been hearing this afternoon, Ashcroft may be stepping aside so that W can appoint Rudy Juliani.

Brock United States Posted on 11/04/2004 at 06:42 PM

Brock pic

Les, I don’t know what to say man! I don’t know how to adore you any more than I already do. Thanks for putting a positive, believable and rational spin to this development. Thanks for a very well written piece.

I’m not moving, and I live in the very state ChristianExodus plans to take over. If I left, how could I live with myself wherever I moved?

My submit word should be “grassroots”, but it isn’t. It’s actually “wall” and I’ll be damned if I put up with a wall being built around my ideals. So “grassroots” is my buzzword for the next four years. It starts small and locally and swells.

Get on the grass everybody!

.rob adams United States Posted on 11/04/2004 at 06:48 PM

.rob adams pic

Consider this:  2008 will happen.

And, before any of you decide to move to another country: my neo-conservative maoist zionist commune is (yes you heard right!) accepting applications.  Although we are located deep in the swamps of SouthEast Massachusetts, safely hidden from sattelite recon, life is good and free and there’s plenty of hydroponic veggies and other fun stuff to be had (we’ve modeled our culture on the various scenes of Yoda’s homeworld).  And there are still a few hollowed out tree stumps left for mid-size families.

Cats are welcomed.
--
Trust me, Truth and Justice shall rise again.
Have a little faith, people.
Things work out, in all things and measures.

ingolfson Germany Posted on 11/04/2004 at 06:52 PM

ingolfson pic

From what I have been hearing this afternoon, Ashcroft may be stepping aside so that W can appoint Rudy Juliani.

Isn’t he in Mexico City, teaching Mexicans not to jaywalk? wink

I’m a bit sceptical about him replacing Ashcroft. What for? Bush is loyal to those who do his work.

Neodromos United States Posted on 11/04/2004 at 07:01 PM

Neodromos pic

An air of relative calm would be nice, but I fear it won’t be forthcoming, nor lasting. So I’ve decided to renew my ACLU membership just in case.

Mick Australia Posted on 11/04/2004 at 07:48 PM

Mick pic

Having recently managed to survive my own country’s federal election (which was nothing less than a complete disaster, though a predictable one) I have to agree with everything you’ve said Les, keep up the good work.

GeekMom United States Posted on 11/04/2004 at 08:50 PM

GeekMom pic

Let’s address the option some folks are considering of moving out of the country.

Not being a US citizen and all I certainly want to keep my family’s options open.

VernR United States Posted on 11/04/2004 at 08:58 PM

VernR pic

I’m a bit sceptical about him replacing Ashcroft. What for? Bush is loyal to those who do his work.

Today the Post-Dispatch carried a story titled Ashcroft likely to leave post.

WASHINGTON (AP)—Attorney General John Ashcroft is likely to leave his post before the start of President Bush’s second term, senior aides said Thursday.

Ashcroft, 62, is described as exhausted from leading the Justice Department in fighting the domestic war on terrorism since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. Stress was a factor in Ashcroft’s health problems earlier this year that resulted in removal of his gall bladder.
. . .
Names that have been floated in recent weeks as a possible replacement include Ashcroft’s former deputy, Larry Thompson, who would become the first black attorney general. Others include Marc Racicot, who was Bush’s campaign manager, and White House general counsel Alberto Gonzales, who would give Bush a notable Hispanic appointment.

Also sometimes mentioned is former New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, but his spokeswoman said he’s not interested. “Rudy Giuliani is not taking John Ashcroft’s job,” Sunny Mindel said.

For the first time in many months, I didn’t finish the front section of the paper. The on air reports that I heard didn’t reflect the full article.

Spocko United States Posted on 11/04/2004 at 10:49 PM

Spocko pic

Thanks Les, you are wise beyond your years.

Les United States Posted on 11/04/2004 at 10:59 PM

Les pic

I’m glad this was well received. I had to leave for a family gathering immediately after posting it so I wasn’t sure how well it went over. My brother-in-law just joined the Reserves and is due to head-out for boot camp within days and may end up in Iraq shortly after finishing that.

Mind you I’m not saying there isn’t cause for concern, but being wary and keeping our eyes open is a lot different than panicking.

 Signature 

Gods dont kill people. People with Gods kill people. - David Viaene

***Dave United States Posted on 11/05/2004 at 12:01 AM

***Dave pic

[B]eing wary and keeping our eyes open is a lot different than panicking.

And is almost always a good idea, regardless of who’s in the White House.

Michelle United States Posted on 11/05/2004 at 01:08 AM

Michelle pic

Great post, Les.  In fact, one of the better ones I’ve seen the past few days.

I’m one of the Purples wink I voted for Kerry based on economic policies, jobs, deficit, and getting us out of Iraq.  However, I lean more toward the conservative side with my beliefs and social issues (with the exception of the ban on gay marriage and such: that is just ridiculous to turn that into a government issue).  But that’s another topic for another day. 

It bothers me that both candidates seemed far out on either side of the spectrum for my taste, yet, that was basically the choice at the buffet, so to speak. Nader was not an option to me.

I NEVER have once mentioned leaving the country.  I’d rather take a stronger stance in politics, and get involved in it locally.  That’ll give me something to do rather than moan and groan the next 4 years. 

Especially since the wonderful state of Kentucky reelected Bunning 51 to 49 percent.  Crazy fuckers.  THAT certainly needs to change.

I’m 23, and I’d like to see people my age ACTUALLY get out and vote, and have candidates pay attention to my demographic.

etherian United States Posted on 11/05/2004 at 02:10 AM

etherian pic

Thank you, Les, for being the voice of reason in the midst of the storm.

Greg United States Posted on 11/05/2004 at 03:13 AM

Greg pic

Some words of wisdom from an unlikely source - Duff McKagen of Velvet Revolver (and formerly of Guns n Roses):
We’ve only got 4 more years of Bush. It’s not like he can take office again.

..and the revolution will be televised.

IMPoe United States Posted on 11/05/2004 at 08:14 AM

IMPoe pic

Interview with an Extraterrestrial

Scene: In an artificial bubble on the surface of Ganymede (one of Jupiter’s moons), an alien explorer describes his visit to Earth.

Can you give us a general picture of Earth and its inhabitants?

The planet is rather pretty, with lots of natural resources. “Fertile” isn’t too strong a word, especially when compared with most places in the local system. There are lots of energy sources, easily accessed, and lots of chemical resources as well. And we think this fertility is why the Earth’s inhabitants—the “humans”—have such distorted ideas about reality.

You mean like the silica worms on Venus, who, because they can’t see through their atmosphere, have the idea that their planet is the entire universe?

No, the humans are much worse. They can see and study the entire universe, but they still think they are the center of everything, that their planet is the reason the universe exists.

(collective gasp from audience)

But only the young humans, the larvae, have these distorted ideas, right?

No, that would be true here, but on Earth even old humans have a larval view of reality. Some never mature beyond expecting a deity, or a government, or nature herself, to satisfy their craving for transformation.

What is this transformation? Don’t they understand what they are?

Not in the slightest. They believe they are super-beings, or are mystically connected to a super-being, so everything is simultaneously temporary and unsatisfactory, to be someday replaced by fame, justice, immortality, or something called “true love.”

Do any of them have our concept of nature as a connected whole, of which all are a part? How do their beliefs differ?

The earthlings have it exactly backward. They think nature exists for them, designed to meet their needs, not that they are part of nature, as we understand it --

(another gasp)

-- But it is much worse than that. They can’t understand why nature won’t meet their most trivial needs, and they are possessed by dissatisfaction. If they look at their planet’s moon, it is unsatisfactory because they can’t build a house on it. Everything is too hot or too cold, too big or too small. Reality is viewed solely in terms of a human’s immediate needs.

How did they stay so backward for so long?

Mostly by looking in the wrong places. You may not believe this, but many of them rely on each other for structure and meaning—they even form units, composed of a leader and followers. The leader pretends to need followers, and the followers pretend to need a leader. Naturally, the most dangerous leaders—and followers—are those who forget it’s a game. This game used to be called “religion,” now it is called “government.”

Are there any regions of more advanced behavior, a place where we could safely present ourselves?

Emphatically not. In fact, there is one area of Earth that is much worse than the others—it’s called “America.” The Americans have raised dissatisfaction to an art form. They rarely notice events and creatures of great beauty, and completely miss spectacular examples of nature’s generosity. For example, I once monitored the brain-waves of a human observing a sunset. After a moment, he thought “If only this sunset were 10% prettier, why then I would be happy.”

What causes this distorted view of reality?
Well, humans have only recently acquired intellectual skills, therefore those skills are in a dangerous, immature form. We have seen this in other places—the Earthlings have Godlike thinking powers grafted onto animal personalities. They have the ability to destroy themselves through badly formed ideas, but no ability to curb their passions.

Their most serious problem is that they still believe in authority --

(gasps and laughter)

-- yes, I know it is hard to believe. Many species throughout the universe have successfully made the transition from animal, instinctive mental processes to true intellect, and along the way they come to recognize authority for what it is: the last vestige of animal thought and behavior. But the transition away from authority can be difficult. The humans are about halfway through this learning process—they still believe in centralized control of individual behavior, and yet they have developed fusion weapons, as though they had any chance to control such weapons with their pack-animal political system.

Don’t they have some version of science and mathematics to help them transcend their animal passions?

Most don’t even know what science and mathematics are, and many of the rest think science can only be practiced by someone called a “scientist.” --

(pandemonium)

-- Yes, and that is the best evidence for their primitive state. They don’t recognize scientific thought as the principal way to evolve from the half-animal, half-civilized state in which they are now living. They don’t understand that science is the moral property of all thinking creatures.

Well, at least they realize they are in transition between the world of animals and intelligent beings?

No, actually they think they are intelligent beings, with no supporting evidence at all. Humans study the geological record of species that have been transformed to meet new requirements, but they don’t realize they are themselves in the midst of such a transformation.

Can we help them? Can we share any part of our knowledge base with them, ease them toward intelligent behavior?

No, I cannot recommend that. They would only use our tools to kill each other, and our ideas would either confuse or frighten them. I recommend that we stay out of their view, as the other advanced species have decided to do, and let them wake up by themselves, in their own good time.

Thank you for your report. Make it so. It is requested that none of our craft approach Earth, or become visible from there.

Send out this request: Stay away from Earth—they must show evidence of civilized behavior before we can allow them to join our community in the stars.

(applause)

source

GeekMom United States Posted on 11/05/2004 at 08:58 AM

GeekMom pic

IMPoe, that was amazing.  And amusing.

Les, on further reflection I do think that there’s one issue in particular for which it is appropriate to panic.  And that is the anti-gay legislation that passed in the 11 states.

You may suspect Bush will push the country in directions we don’t want to see, and that may or may not happen, but legalized restrictions on the civil rights of a good 10% of our population just happened.  This is not a matter of perspective; it is a fact.  THIS is something we need to fight right now.  THIS is a larger step backwards, in my opinion, than even the Patriot Act.

And it is very sad to say, but given the results of the election, I’m starting to agree with some in the gay community who did NOT want the lawsuit brought in Massachusetts that resulted in the court ruling allowing gay marriage.  It brought the subject into the limelight at exactly the wrong time, and it turned into a conflagration that according to many polls tipped the balance towards Bush in a serious way.  It ignited the culture war at its most flammable point.

Page 1 of 4 pages  1 2 3 >  Last »

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Smileys


Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:


<< Back to main